Re: Filesystem corruption

patch. That was not always the case in the recent past. No wonder people started to get their own hands dirty from time to time. Btw: It's also fun to read / mess with the code ... -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox fax: +49-(0)-12125-10226517 public key 86326EC9, http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact

Re: Filesystem corruption

... Thanks. -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox fax: +49-(0)-12125-10226517 public key 86326EC9, http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact

Re: Filesystem corruption

On 2007-06-03 03:10, Edward Shishkin wrote: Ingo Bormuth wrote: Hm, same here. I lost /bin/sleep several times. Would you please describe the problem in more details? What kernel version? What does I lost /bin/sleep mean? Does it mean that: 1. /bin/sleep was truncated to 0 bytes, i.e. ls -l

Re: Filesystem corruption

noatime). How could pure execution of a file cause corruption of the file itself? Any idea ? Apart from that single file, I never had any serious problems with reiser4 on three busy systems for years - fsck.reiser4 works like charme. -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox fax: +49-(0)-12125-10226517 public

Re: [patch] reiser4-for-2.6.20

reiser4 cryptocmpress? I'm running two system using my original 2.6.20-patch. There wasn't a single problem (even under heavy io). I just created an ext3 partition and filled it up with files from reiser4. What did you actually do to trigger the errors? Cryptocompress? Ingo -- Ingo Bormuth

Re: [patch] reiser4-for-2.6.20

Problem has gone away. Nevertheless I'm a bit confused. The 'spin_lock(inode_lock);' line is already there (it's part of the official code since reiser4-for-2.6.11). There might have been an other issue... Cheers Ingo -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox fax: +49-(0)-12125-10226517 public key 86326EC9

[patch] reiser4-for-2.6.20

/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fba2591bf4e418b6c3f9f8794c9dd8fe40ae7bd9 -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox fax: +49-(0)-12125-10226517 public key 86326EC9, http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact diff -Nru linux-2.6.20-reiser4/fs/reiser4/entd.c new-linux-2.6.20-reiser4/fs/reiser4/entd.c --- linux

Re: some testing questions

measurefs.reiser4 -S -T -D on a mounted fs ? -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49-12125-10226517 '(~o-o~)' public key 86326EC9, http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact --ooO--(.)--Ooo--

Re: 2.6.17 patch is in testing now

On 2006-07-18 13:43, Hans Reiser wrote: If testing goes well we will release it tomorrow. Hmm, so what would you say - should it be regarded as released ? -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49-12125-10226517 '(~o-o~)' public key 86326EC9, http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact --ooO

BUG: fs/reiser4/block_alloc.c:194 ctx-grabbed_blocks

for weeks without ever having seen any problem or any file corruption !!! Following the reboot the machine runs just as nice as before. Nothing found in logs. Cheers -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49-12125-10226517 '(~o-o~)' public key 86326EC9, http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact

Specify tmgr.atom_max_age per directory ?

Is it (or will it once) be possible to specify tmgr.atom_max_age on a per directory basis. To do something link: / : tmgr.atom_max_age=300 /data : tmgr.atom_max_age=30 /var : tmgr.atom_max_age=900 /tmp : tmgr.atom_max_age=INFINITE -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49

Re: Collect data?

are mounted -o noatime,nodiratime ;) Remounting with -o atime,diratime immediately makes the system creap as if it was an old snail. -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49-12125-10226517 '(~o-o~)' public key 86326EC9, http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact ---ooO--(.)--Ooo---

Re: More Slowdown

-for-2.6.14-1. It's a slow laptop with broken DMA so I should realize if there was something wrong. Afaik every poster complaining so far had mm-kernels, larger patchsets or additional stuff as swsusp2. So: Do jou see the slowdown/crashes in vanilla ? -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49

Re: More Slowdown

right) in one go, and making everything wait. -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49-12125-10226517 '(~o-o~)' public key 86326EC9, http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact ---ooO--(.)--Ooo---

Re: Slowdown is gone apt-get works with updated reiser4. So nevermind...

I synced the gentoo tree. After switching from 2-6-14-archck5 to reiser4-for-vanilla-2.6.14-2.patch applied to vanilla linux-2.6.14.2 everything seems to work just fine. BTW find ebuild at: http://public.efil.de/gentoo/sys-kernel/reiser4-sources/ -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49-12125

Re: My Dad suggests a redundant copies plugin

, oun could then easily add the proposed redundancy feature (implemented as the files version number zero). -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49-12125-10226517 '(~o-o~)' public key 86326EC9, http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact ---ooO--(.)--Ooo---

Re: Full of surprises - A reiser4 story from userland

of application also is up to the technically interested user. A quite stable and easy to use patchset including reiser4 is called ArchCK and can be found at: http://iphitus.loudas.com/archck.php I currently use 2.6.13-archck3.1 together with reiser4progs-1.0.5 and that works like charm. -- Ingo Bormuth

Re: why does reiserfs list get so much spam?

be applicable for the archive (which really is hard to read by now). -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49-12125-10226517'(~o o~)' GnuPG key 86326EC9 at http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact ooO--(.)--Ooo

Re: why does reiserfs list get so much spam?

configuration with a threshold of 7 plus razor, pyzor and dcc. It does a very good job. -- Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49-12125-10226517'(~o o~)' GnuPG key 86326EC9 at http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact ooO--(.)--Ooo

Re: reiser4 performance

load. I never, ever found any fs corruption !!! If only it had a resizer :( Yes, yes, yes. I hear it is a matter of money. So why don't you raise a fund? I pretty much like the concept at fundable.org. -- ++ | Ingo Bormuth

Re: reiser4 performance

. -- ++ | Ingo Bormuth, voicebox telefax: +49-12125-10226517 | | GnuPG key 86326EC9 at http://ibormuth.efil.de/contact | ++