On Thu 22 Jun 2006 17:08, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
http://iphitus.loudas.com/archck.php
I used to use this indeed, but there hadn't been any updates for a while.
So I decided to go back to the ck patches and add Reiser4 myself. :)
It's working fine:
09:00:09 up 15:50, 1 user, load
On Thu 22 Jun 2006 17:00, Alexey Polyakov wrote:
There should be one failed chunk (mm/readahead.c), just ignore it.
Really? It wouldn't compile, so I added to line 567 of mm/readahead.c the
following:
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_ra_miss);
I got this from a Reject file...
Note: I applied both
On Thu 23 Mar 2006 16:26, Robert Hulme wrote:
Are there any estimates of when the repacker and compression plugins
will be available / stable?
...mumbles something about a resizer or something...
Ray
On Fri 17 Mar 2006 12:25, Brian Uhrain wrote:
I just noticed that a Reiser4 patch for kernel 2.6.14.6 was posted on
ftp.namesys.com yesterday, and I was wondering what changes (if any)
there are to Reiser4 itself between that patch and the 2.6.15 patch that
was released two months ago?
Why
On Fri 20 Jan 2006 13:02, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
ReiserFS: dm-8: warning: vs-4080: reiserfs_free_block: free_block
(dm-8:46707368)[dev:blocknr]: bit already cleared
It would be interesting to check the filesystem after a week of regular
load to see whether new such corruptions
On Tue 24 Jan 2006 6:43, Jeffrey Mahoney wrote:
Hi Jeff,
ReiserFS: dm-8: warning: vs-4080: reiserfs_free_block: free_block
(dm-8:46707368)[dev:blocknr]: bit already cleared
What kernel version are you using for this node? I've been developing
the on-demand bitmap patches and have been
On Thu 19 Jan 2006 3:09, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
ReiserFS: dm-8: warning: vs-4080: reiserfs_free_block: free_block
(dm-8:46707368)[dev:blocknr]: bit already cleared
It would be interesting to check the filesystem after a week of regular
load to see whether new such corruptions
On Tue 17 Jan 2006 23:32, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
ReiserFS: dm-8: warning: vs-4080: reiserfs_free_block: free_block
(dm-8:46707368)[dev:blocknr]: bit already cleared
This indicated a corruption in disk space allocation bitmap: used block
was marked as free.
I see..
Am
Hello,
This morning I found the following warning on my Debian server holding a 253
GB Debian archive mirror:
ReiserFS: dm-8: warning: vs-4080: reiserfs_free_block: free_block
(dm-8:46707368)[dev:blocknr]: bit already cleared
If fixed it with --fix-fixable, but what was it and what does it
On Thu 15 Dec 2005 14:09, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
I just tried to mount my reiserfs (which i fixed) as loopback (it worked
before ..)
but this time i got this error (and a segfault):
[snip]
Whooaah mate, this looks serious...
Are you sure your hardware is okay? Have you run MemTest86+
On Wed 9 Nov 2005 2:21, rvalles wrote:
If you are refering to 2.6.14-arckck3, I tried it and it doesn't fix a
thing. Even more, it triggers it more often, probably related to it's
agressivity against cache (swap prefetch, less tendency to swap, etc.).
I'm using 2.6.14-archck3.
Could one of
On Friday 14 October 2005 12:40, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
[...]
Now my reiserfsck tests if volume label exists, and in such case
displays it like:
SPARE: Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x307 of format 3.6 with
standard journal
[..]
What is your opinion then, reiserfs people?
I
On Friday 14 October 2005 13:09, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
I can't speak for the Namesys people, but personally I think it's a
brilliant idea!
And now that I think about it...can the same thing be done for Reiser4?
And is it possible to change/create a Reiser4 Label AFTER the Filesystem
has
On Friday 14 October 2005 15:07, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
[...]
ok, I will add it.
Vitaly, is it possible to add labels to Reiser4 filesystems AFTER mkfs,
or only during mkfs?
Thanks,
Ray
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 12:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to reproduce it : Install the latest Nvidia driver.
Interesting...I also have problems with Reiser4, 2.6.13 (I use archck8
however) and NVIDIA...
X just locks up unexpectedly. Don't know if it's related but who
knows...
I
On Thursday 22 September 2005 13:19, Pysiak Satriani wrote:
I might be wrong here, but bad blocks are a condition that the kernel
should handle without barfing oops traces, so there indeed may be
not enough sanity checks somewhere.
Perhaps...
I can do some more testing, but there are more
On Friday 23 September 2005 11:35, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
Ray, you might want to try to mount reiser4 with -o
onerror=remount-ro This may help to avoid some of oopses
I'll try this.
You need new hard drive.
I already have one (an old 80GB) but the broken one is 200GB and
Hello,
I experienced a Reiser4 lock-up this morning when I stopped an rdiff-backup
process.
My guess is that my hard disk has developed bad sectors. Am I correct?
To make sure I'm running badblocks now.
The kernel is 2.6.13-archck5 and here's the relevant syslog bit:
Sep 22 07:36:30
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
it into the stable 2.6 kernel?
If only it had a resizer :(
That's one of the main reasons I stopped
On Tuesday 7 June 2005 15:10, Adrian Ulrich wrote:
Ok, but i think it's still strange:
This message only re-appears if i do a:
mount -o ro /dev/md1 /somewhere
mount -o remount,rw /dev/md1 /somewhere --- !!!
umount /dev/md1
fsck.reiser4 /dev/md1 -- fsck will complain..
What happens
On Sat 28 May 2005 22:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm glad Reiserfs worked for him, but somehow I don't see Hans
listing this one on the Reiserfs success stories page. ;)
from 2 inches to nearly 6 inches.
He must have used Reiser4(inches) then :)
Ray
Hiya,
I just converted all the Reiser4 partitions on my desktop back to
ReiserFS after spending most of the morning on fixing my /usr once
again...
Nearly every time my machine crashed the past year or so (which doesn't
happen often) it left my Reiser4 partitions (/usr in particular)
riddled
On Thu 3 March 2005 17:33, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Nearly every time my machine crashed the past year or so (which
doesn't happen often) it left my Reiser4 partitions (/usr in
particular) riddled with file system errors.
What kind of load did your desktop do when it crashed?
Not too
Hello,
Yesterday afternoon kmail crashed unexpectedly:
Sep 22 14:12:14 rmeijer-noc kernel: reiser4[kmail(4826)]: extent2tail
(fs/reiser4/plugin/file/tail_conversion.c:654)[nikita-2282]:
Sep 22 14:12:14 rmeijer-noc kernel: WARNING: Partial conversion of 280274: 0 of 1: -28
Sep 22 14:12:14
On Thu 15 July 2004 15:21, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
Hi,
would you try the latest reiser4progs from
www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/
I'm trying to compile it too, after applying the
reiser4progs-0.5.6-libaux-gauge.c.diff patch, but it doesn't compile:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
On Thu 15 July 2004 16:27, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
there is a new version of libaal package that needs to be installed first.
Is that this one:
1805803b582a8799871bf11f2bc2ef77 libaal-0.5.3.tar.gz
from http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.07.13-internal.testing/ ?
That's the one I used...
On Thu 15 July 2004 16:39, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
there is a new version of libaal package that needs to be installed
first.
That's the one I used...
probably you have occasionally not uninstalled libaal.h file somewhere ?
have you run ldconfig after installing the libaal ?
There was
On Thu 3 June 2004 18:22, Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
Any ideas as to what happened?! :)
Seems we made a disk format change accidentally.
details later. or a fix may be.
please try this patch:
[forward.h patch]
Okay, patch applied and recompiling...
Thanks,
Ray
On Fri 4 June 2004 10:29, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
please try this patch:
[forward.h patch]
Okay, patch applied and recompiling...
So far so good. fsck.reiser4 found no errors, and everything mounted properly.
Thanks a lot!
Ray (from 2.6.6-mm2 :)
Hi,
Can someone point me to a WORKING Reiser4 patch for kernel 2.6.6 or 2.6.6-mm2?
I have tried the reiser4-2004.05.31-19.36-linux-2.6.6-mm2.diff.gz patch from
http://www.namesys.com/auto-snapshots/ and it compiles and boots cleanly, but
it won't mount my Reiser4 partitions :(
Does anybody
On Mon 3 May 2004 15:42, John Wilkes wrote:
Here's where it gets weird: I booted the Rescue system on the
installation CD, and from there I ran reiserfsck, which reported no
inconsistecies. I can mount /dev/hda3 and look around; everything
seems to be there. But when I try to boot a system
On Tue 20 April 2004 21:54, Sander Sweers wrote:
Error: Node (1444613), item (2): StatData of the file [2a:0:] has the
wrong bytes (0), Should be (188). Plugin (stat40).
Time interval: Tue Apr 20 17:03:20 2004 - Tue Apr 20 17:07:02 2004
* fsck.reiser4 finished at Tue Apr 20
On Wed 21 April 2004 11:55, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
Hi Vitaly,
Thanks for your reply!
would you try this patch, it should fix the problem,
email me about the result please.
I got several rejects:
patching file librepair/repair.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
On Wed 21 April 2004 11:55, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
would you try this patch, it should fix the problem,
email me about the result please.
No luck... :(
fsck.reiser4 --fix /dev/sys/backup:
==
On Wed 21 April 2004 14:51, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
No luck... :(
ok, that patch avoids such problems if you have not fsck'ed yet.
Aha! :)
I have put another internal reiser4progs snapshot with some more
fixes into the www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.04.21-internal.testing/
I have no
35 matches
Mail list logo
