Sergey Ivanov wrote on 03/28/06 13:52:
> Joe Feise wrote:
>> The machine is using ECC memory. Geez, I know what I need for a server...
>> From the Dell invoice:
>> 512MB DDR2, 400MHz,2X256MB ECC 1R DIMMs for PowerEdge SC420
>> Recreating the partition solved the problem. So to me it sure looks lik
Gregory Maxwell wrote on 03/28/06 13:22:
> On 3/28/06, Jonathan Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> But for a production machine that is "producing" something of value, the
>> extra cost should not be an issue. RAM errors are so subtle and so hard
>> to find that ECC is of far more value than
Joe Feise wrote:
>
> The machine is using ECC memory. Geez, I know what I need for a server...
> From the Dell invoice:
> 512MB DDR2, 400MHz,2X256MB ECC 1R DIMMs for PowerEdge SC420
> Recreating the partition solved the problem. So to me it sure looks like
> fs corruption.
> I have sent the dmesg
On 3/28/06, Jonathan Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But for a production machine that is "producing" something of value, the
> extra cost should not be an issue. RAM errors are so subtle and so hard
> to find that ECC is of far more value than RAID. It is obvious when
> your disk fails.
>
>
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 12:08 -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Jonathan Briggs wrote:
[...]
> >And if it's a production machine, it is using ECC RAM, I would hope. If
> >it is, memory problems (unreported ones, anyway) are very, very
> >unlikely.
> >
> >
> Jonathan, be merciful, ECC ram last I checked
Joe Feise wrote:
> Jonathan Briggs writes:
>
>> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:34 -0800, Joachim Feise wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> This is a production machine that I can't take offline for too long.
>>> But yes, I have compiled the kernel on another reiser4 partition
>>> over night,
>>> without problems.
>>
Hans Reiser writes:
Jonathan Briggs wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:34 -0800, Joachim Feise wrote:
[...]
This is a production machine that I can't take offline for too long.
But yes, I have compiled the kernel on another reiser4 partition over night,
without problems.
If this was a memory
Jonathan Briggs writes:
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:34 -0800, Joachim Feise wrote:
[...]
This is a production machine that I can't take offline for too long.
But yes, I have compiled the kernel on another reiser4 partition over night,
without problems.
If this was a memory problem, it would indeed
Jonathan Briggs wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:34 -0800, Joachim Feise wrote:
>[...]
>
>
>>This is a production machine that I can't take offline for too long.
>>But yes, I have compiled the kernel on another reiser4 partition over night,
>>without problems.
>>If this was a memory problem, it
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:34 -0800, Joachim Feise wrote:
[...]
> This is a production machine that I can't take offline for too long.
> But yes, I have compiled the kernel on another reiser4 partition over night,
> without problems.
> If this was a memory problem, it would indeed manifest itself in
On 28-Mar-06, at 10:34 AM, Joachim Feise wrote:
Toby Thain wrote on 03/27/06 22:34:
On 27-Mar-06, at 11:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:32:14 PST, Joe Feise said:
Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't run a memtest, but I don't
really think
that the memory is bad. Th
Toby Thain wrote on 03/27/06 22:34:
> On 27-Mar-06, at 11:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:32:14 PST, Joe Feise said:
>>
>>> Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't run a memtest, but I don't
>>> really think
>>> that the memory is bad. The machine most likely would have
On 27-Mar-06, at 11:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:32:14 PST, Joe Feise said:
Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't run a memtest, but I don't
really think
that the memory is bad. The machine most likely would have had
other issues
if that was the case.
You'd be *
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:32:14 PST, Joe Feise said:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't run a memtest, but I don't really think
> that the memory is bad. The machine most likely would have had other issues
> if that was the case.
You'd be *amazed*. Intermittently weak memory (especially if it
Joe Feise wrote on 03/27/06 13:41:
> Hi,
>
> I had an interesting crash on my 2.6.16-mm1 machine earlier today.
> I usually mount /usr/local readonly:
> /dev/sda6 on /usr/local type reiser4 (ro)
> However, since I wanted to update a sw package, I remounted it r/w.
> The installation of the sw pa
Toby Thain writes:
On 27-Mar-06, at 4:41 PM, Joe Feise wrote:
Hi,
I had an interesting crash on my 2.6.16-mm1 machine earlier today.
I usually mount /usr/local readonly:
/dev/sda6 on /usr/local type reiser4 (ro)
However, since I wanted to update a sw package, I remounted it r/w.
The installat
On 27-Mar-06, at 4:41 PM, Joe Feise wrote:
Hi,
I had an interesting crash on my 2.6.16-mm1 machine earlier today.
I usually mount /usr/local readonly:
/dev/sda6 on /usr/local type reiser4 (ro)
However, since I wanted to update a sw package, I remounted it r/w.
The installation of the sw package
Hi,
I had an interesting crash on my 2.6.16-mm1 machine earlier today.
I usually mount /usr/local readonly:
/dev/sda6 on /usr/local type reiser4 (ro)
However, since I wanted to update a sw package, I remounted it r/w.
The installation of the sw package failed with reiser4 errors. Sorry, I
don't
18 matches
Mail list logo
