Hello
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 03:26, marco wrote:
E.Gryaznova wrote:
Hello.
reiserfsck can check reiserfs filesystem mounted read-only.
Running 'fsck.reiserfs --check -y /dev/part' will do the trick. The
equivalent for ext3 and other filesystems is
'fsck -n /dev/part', the ext3
btinsley wrote:
What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
devices, can run periodic background consistency checks on filesystems
with almost zero impact on performance. Some devices are reportedly
Hello,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:20 -0500
btinsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
| mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
| devices, can run periodic background consistency checks on filesystems
Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:20 -0500
btinsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
| mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
| devices, can run periodic background consistency
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Then Hans should setup a paypal account for donations. I'd gladly give
what I can spare, and I think so would a lot of people here.
http://namesys.com/support.html
I've donated that way and it's worked every time.
Maybe some
good features, and they are all something I would rather
donate money towards than an online fsck.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQIVAwUBQpekPHgHNmZLgCUhAQK5pxAAkmVS/NzA2xDMuiNH2LCBSaUpGl/nbMzP
I'd rather donate for a reiser4 online repacker. By the time
something's fsck'd, so to speak, I'd rather take it offline and possibly
pull in backups. But a repacker (even an offine one) and a resizer
(even an offline one) are two things that we even have in the Linux
ntfs-tools, and it's
Hello.
reiserfsck can check reiserfs filesystem mounted read-only.
Thanks,
Lena
btinsley wrote:
Is there or was there a plan to support running reiserfsck on a
mounted v3 filesystem (just a check, not a fix or rebuild)? I seem to
remember this being mentioned here at some point in time, but I
E.Gryaznova wrote:
Hello.
reiserfsck can check reiserfs filesystem mounted read-only.
Running 'fsck.reiserfs --check -y /dev/part' will do the trick. The
equivalent for ext3 and other filesystems is
'fsck -n /dev/part', the ext3 version detects that it is mounted rw,
and does a readonly
What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
devices, can run periodic background consistency checks on filesystems
with almost zero impact on performance. Some devices are reportedly
running these checks
Is there or was there a plan to support running reiserfsck on a
mounted v3 filesystem (just a check, not a fix or rebuild)? I seem to
remember this being mentioned here at some point in time, but I was
unable to find it in the mailing list archive.
Thanks!
On Thursday 22 April 2004 12:45, Nikita Danilov wrote:
Chris Dukes writes:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 04:24:02PM +0200, Jure Pe??ar wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:34:14 -0400
Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Online check is easy, just use lvm or evms to make a snapshot and
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 07:45:08PM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
Chris Dukes writes:
It is worth mentioning that FreeBSD supposedly has an online in the
background fsck for UFS2.
Wait a second. Assuming that kernel code has no bugs, the only
corruption that may happen when
Jure Pear wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:24:09 +0100
Chris Dukes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is worth mentioning that FreeBSD supposedly has an online in the
background fsck for UFS2.
Yes ... such online fsck is the only major feature i miss on Linux.
(my boss is pushing Veritas on me
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 09:00, Jure Pear wrote:
Hi all,
Is it theoretically posible?
Like, does it need a drastic redesing of reiserfs or just sufficient $$
directed to the team to be implemented?
Because i think that reiserfsck --check in 12h + --rebuild-tree in 18h is
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 13:51, Hans Reiser wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 09:00, Jure Pear wrote:
Hi all,
Is it theoretically posible?
Like, does it need a drastic redesing of reiserfs or just sufficient $$
directed to the team to be implemented?
Because i
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 13:51, Hans Reiser wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 09:00, Jure Pear wrote:
Hi all,
Is it theoretically posible?
Like, does it need a drastic redesing of reiserfs or just sufficient $$
directed to the team to be
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:51:12AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
Online check is easy, just use lvm or evms to make a snapshot and then
check the snapshot.
Requires that users use lvm before discovering the need for fsck, but,
yes. What would be ideal would be some
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Jure Pe??ar wrote:
Is it theoretically posible?
It is actually implemented in the BSD kernels, for UFS. Look for
softdep or softupdates.
As for other file systems, when crashing while the write cache is
enabled (unfortunately, it is in FreeBSD for instance), it can royally
19 matches
Mail list logo
