On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 02:59:29PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 03:24:39PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
This VFS interface is an integral part of ??very filesystem, and it
VFS never was an integral part of ANY filesystem. my dog knows it.
its just unified INTERFACE
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 02:59:29PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
P.S. I imagine, how much flamed it would be if reiser4 made any intensive
changes in linux VFS code...
Surely it would be flamefest galore, but thanks to Reiser4 there may be
some VFS changes to that direction, maybe completely
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 03:18:07PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
Yes, I think it would be nice to have this infrastructure in VFS. Technically.
But its not possible, cause of committee clusterfuck. Socially. Stupidly.
Please explain your problems. I've not seen a single actually working
Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 01:22:55PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 03:18:07PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
Yes, I think it would be nice to have this infrastructure in VFS. Technically.
But its not possible, cause of committee clusterfuck. Socially. Stupidly.
Please
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 03:46:28PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
Not true. If true - send bugreports.
Its work for me couple of months. there were few hiccups, but they got fixed
quickly by [EMAIL PROTECTED] only ext2 partition is /boot cause of BIOS
limitations. Yes, i use it with LVM2 and
Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 01:12:33PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 02:59:29PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 03:24:39PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
This VFS interface is an integral part of ??very filesystem, and it
VFS never was an integral
Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 01:51:04PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 03:46:28PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
Its work for me couple of months. there were few hiccups, but they got fixed
quickly by [EMAIL PROTECTED] only ext2 partition is /boot cause of BIOS
limitations.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 04:05:02PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote:
But one could even say VFS is integral part of a linux filesystem as
it does most of the work a filesystem driver does in other operating
systems.
theres no linux filesystem. there are linux filesystems.
thanks god.
a
Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2004, 17:37 +0200 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
compression or encryption must sit below the pagecache to work nicely,
and this hint things that usually sit at the pagecache level. But let's
assume you have a valid use for different file_operations, why don't you
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 05:48:54PM +0200, Christophe Saout wrote:
I don't know, ask Hans. How could the VFS know it a filesystem wants to
do something specific with a file that is completely transparent to the
VFS?
The VFS shouldn't, that the whole point. That's why it allows the
Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2004, 18:06 +0200 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
Again, your confusing upper and lower plugins. For things happening
below the pagecache you could register different address_space
operations which sometimes makes sense. But you want e.g. different
inode_operations for
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 06:14:19PM +0200, Christophe Saout wrote:
Ok, I see your point. aops. Sorry.
Looking at the code this could be done. The wrappers that dispatch the
operations are really small and call the plugin that is registered with
the inode of the mapping. Instead it could have
12 matches
Mail list logo
