Is this supported, or will it be supported by ReiserFS?
I use this feature quite quite much.. Maybe this is something to
add to ReiserFS?
There is very brief info at Microsoft's website:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/en-us/core/fncc_fil_khzt.asp
My policy is that user hassle should be minimal, and we should try to
select at least one default key management set of utilities to integrate
well with and test with.
Are you sure we should not get keys from the environment? Is there too
much performance cost?
It would be best if people
I have an ide raid server with a 610GB /home directory with errors. Running
reiserfsck --check says it has found 6 errors which can be fixed with
--fix-fixable. But when I run it with --fix-fixable, the option is ignored and
and a check is simply run again. Any advice? The filesystem errors
Anders, here is what I have and it works on thousands of duplicate
servers:
Tyan S2420 with 1.0GHz PIII
512MB RAM
Promise PDC20269 in PCI1
Using PDC20268
Intel Dual 10/100 NIC in PCI2
Four Maxtor 250GB IDE drives off of the Promise controller
lk 2.4.19 on RH7.3
hdparm -a64 -K1
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, at 11:11am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Get yourself a 3Ware controller.
I'll second the 3Ware recommendation. We've used them and they are rock
solid. Active, open source support from the OEM. Web-based management
tool. Email alerts on problems. Very nice.
I am
Do you have apic enabled or disabled in both the kernel and the BIOS?
Do you have acpi enabled or disabled in both the kernel and the BIOS?
Yes, right now both are. Will be trying without. If it works it means
there is a nasty bug in the kernel/or Promise drivers?
Have now tried without
Why are these posted to the list?
Start SpamAssassin results
# time reiserfsck -a /dev/sdb1
Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x811 of format 3.6 with standard journal
Blocks (total/free): 143109020/59148009 by 4096 bytes
Filesystem is cleanly umounted
Replaying journal..
0 transactions replayed
Checking internal tree..finished
real
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Anders Widman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The others want to make Linux a viable option for normal users and
want Linux to be able to replace Windows or Mac OS. The only way I see
that happen is if Linux starts to get more userfriendly and safe.
Last time I
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:26, Anders Widman wrote:
Unplanned downtime do cause lot of harm to any business.
It's better to stop when there's a serious error than to blindly continue
and make things worse.
I (and I think no one else) never said continue blindly. Most
users
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 02:17, Anders Widman wrote:
I've used ReiserFS in the past, but have also used ext3 on my
user's important
data (/home) after a good chunk of one drive was converted to
sparse/null files due to a screwup stemming from no 'badblocks' support
in reiserfs
Every resource we have is going to go into getting V4 done and stable so
that we can sell it in the summer. Hopefully we will make it.
Just a question. (I know lots of people will shout at me for asking,
but please don't :) Will V3/4 be ported to Windows, or are we doomed
to use the new
On Mit, 12 Feb 2003, Anders Widman wrote:
Just a question. (I know lots of people will shout at me for asking,
but please don't :) Will V3/4 be ported to Windows, or are we doomed
to use the new MS database with integrated Palladium software?
very unlikely. porting a filesystem
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:40:04PM +0100, Anders Widman wrote:
Every resource we have is going to go into getting V4 done and stable so
that we can sell it in the summer. Hopefully we will make it.
Just a question. (I know lots of people will shout at me for asking,
but please
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:20:26PM -0500, James Thompson wrote:
I am a visual artist and musician.
Check out the document at
http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/ALSA_JACK_ARDOUR.html. There a
section that benchmarks various filesystems for their latency. The
short story is that Reiserfs
Can someone point me to the right reiserfsprogs?
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs-3.6.4.tar.gz
TIA,
Raj
//Anders
Are you sure it is a ReiserFS and not a kernel thing?
I would think it is probably not. I have seen this also when running
things like badblocks /dev/hdb and the kswapd eats up all CPU
recourses. Then again I am always using ReiserFS so I do not know if
the ReiserFS is the cause or
Most messages on this forum have focused on optimizing performance,
however I'm looking for suggestions in an effort to reduce power
consumption on the 1.2TB RAID servers we run.
The boxes are mostly used for archiving huge amounts of data and only
see usage for a third of the day at most.
names.
register.com is only responsible, as a middle hand, to arrange
payments for registrants to internic. Once you have payed, it is your
domain to do whatever you like with. InterNic, on the other hand,
would perhaps have the ability, or right to suspend a domain name.
//Anders Widman
down the
SPAM, or is this just a pipe dream?
Um, Why not block messages from senders that are not registered with
this list? Also, if someone outside this list tries to send a message
here, he would recieve a note that he must register before posting, or
something like that.
- Anders Widman
Hi,
So you ran reiserfsck --rebuild-tree which finished properly, then mounted fs,
got kernel oops, and then reiserfsck --fix-fixable aborted. Right?
Could you provide us metadata of your partition extracted with:
debugreiserfs -p /dev/xxx | bzip2 -c xxx.bz2
and put it somewhere on
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 08:08:21AM -0800, Matthew Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 03 April 2002 00:21, Joe Cooper wrote:
Don't
Well I don't, but when newbies who are used to computing on win32 systems
hear that they may not just accept the word don't. Actually its hard to find
the
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 11:16:51AM +0200, Anders Widman wrote:
I do not agree. I run a fileserver with a 814GB filesystem using
ReiserFS (I have run NTFS and ext2/3 also). Modern filesystems might
be smarter in storing new files by not packing them tightly.
In my case that workes fine up
Don't
;-)
ReiserFS (and ext2|3) do fragment somewhat, but the impact is not worth
fighting over on most systems (certain environments are impacted more
than others--mail servers and web caches being two examples that are hit
pretty hard by fragmentation performance degradation).
Hey everyone.
I had to do a --rebuild-tree to fix my filesystem. The problem is
that it is very slow. It starts out by reading about 25MB/s for the
first hours. Then it slowly degrades and comes to a crawl the last
part.
The filesystem is 814GB, and reiserfsck reports about 213 million
blocks
Has anyone any clea about MS way of implementing security/encryption
with NTFS under Windows XP? That could perhaps be a good source for ideas.
//Anders
Sam Vilain wrote:
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If
someone says to me that they've already implemented most of what I need
for
On Saturday, March 02, 2002 06:55:24 PM +0300 Oleg Drokin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 07:16:08PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
I have some observation here that I cannot explain to myself.
It seems as though ReiserFS impaired my throughput on 650 MB files,
Hello!
Hi! =)
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:22:38PM +0100, Jens Benecke wrote:
Blocks in wrong order *is* serious!
Oops.
(have you tried 2.5.3/2.5.4-pre1 kernels there?)
No. I haven't tried 2.5.x. kernels yet and I'm not about to.
Just making sure. Error that can cause these items in
28 matches
Mail list logo
