Hello
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 01:44, alftheo potgieter wrote:
Hi
I'm using the latest reiserfsck (3.6.19),,
My filesystem got corrupted by an unexpected power loss. Initially, I
could mount the filesystem read-only with minor problems. As I had
nowhere to back it up, I ran reiserfsck
Hello,
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 21:07, Sergey Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry to report problems I had this night at my e-mail server.
Grepped reiser4 messages from /var/log/messages are at
http://parkheights.dyndns.org/r4log.bz2
I have 2 processor system (athlon) with raid5 software array with
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 18:51, Alain Knaff wrote:
We have a corrupted reiserfs filesystem here which can't even be repaired
with
--rebuid-tree.
The error messages happens at pass 3a:
Pass 3a (looking for lost dir/files):
### Pass 3a (lost+found pass) #
Looking for lost
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 21:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(sorry for multiple posts)
After a crash my reiserfs partition behaved strangely (space usage 100%,
root wasn't allowed to see some files or write into some directories,
and some error messages when accessing files).
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:35, Alain Knaff wrote:
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
Hi Alain,
the fixed reiserfsprogs version is attched, it contains
some bugfixes, please run it and report about the result.
Thank you.
Actually, the problem happened with reiserfs-3.6.18-5 (as shipped
On Sunday 05 March 2006 22:07, Harald Weigl wrote:
Hello!
Hello
I ended up in quite a mess. What has happened was:
- The file system ran full while copying CF-Card with pictures I took and
started to give a lot of error messages, some of them telling me that
fixing can only be done
On Sunday 05 March 2006 00:32, zotyalpb wrote:
Hi
I have an amd64 box with debian/sarge.
it has two reiserfs, one for the root (sda1 - 36G), and one for home (md0 -
500G / raid10).
Since a week it randomly crashes. I got reiserfs panic in the syslog, and
the md0 is not responding, but
On Friday 03 February 2006 14:37, luc wrote:
Hi,
i have a big trouble with the grub with reiser4 patch. Look here:
./install.sh:
grub root (hd0,0)
═Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
grub setup (hd0)
═Checking if /boot/grub/stage1 exists... yes
═Checking if
On Monday 30 January 2006 18:57, Bryant, Phillip -AES wrote:
RedHat ES Workstation, 2.6.9-11smp
Dell Precision 530 workstation
Dell Powervault RAID with 500Gb RAID partition
reiserfs 3.6.19
The virtual RAID disk was inadvertantly broken when the Dell powervault was
split into two
On Thursday 19 January 2006 22:53, Bruce Guenter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 09:34:49PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
thank you for the report, the attached patch should fix
the broken mount options. please try it.
It does indeed fix the problem. What other mount options would have
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 21:58, Hans Reiser wrote:
The result is not expected, Vitaly please look into it.
Hans
Bruce Guenter wrote:
Hi.
I've been running a few tests with reiserfs and tails, and have been
unable to create a setup where the use (or lack) of tails results in a
On Saturday 07 January 2006 06:46, Eric P wrote:
So I'm doing an 'mplayer -dumpfile', and before I know it I've
completely filled the last 10GB of my hard drive (total 80GB). It
wasn't were the OS resided; just a HD used for a file holding space.
Anyway, after reaching 100%, the folder I
On Saturday 03 December 2005 20:26, Charles Johnston wrote:
I've been keeping quite up-to-date with new kernels, so I compiled
2.6.15-rc4 plus the reiser4 patches from 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 plus the
reiser4-fix-fsync.patch.
I'm using grub 0.97 with the 20050808 reiser4 patch.
Put the new kernel
On Monday 05 December 2005 01:27, Marcus Fleige wrote:
Hi list,
i got a problem i need to get solved really badly. Maybe you can help?
It is extremly important to me to get that data back.
For the situation:
I got a linux server here with a data disk and a backup disk, both
encrypted
On Monday 21 November 2005 10:09, Hans Reiser wrote:
Philippe GramoullИ wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:07:23 +0100
rvalles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| When I run make install on something and haven't specified a prefix on
| configure, I expect /usr/local to be used. If I
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 20:27, iv wrote:
i'm following an advice to send a bug report about failed reiserfsck
--rebuild-tree found at http://www.namesys.com/faq.html#rebuild-tree.
i tried to compile the newest reiserfsprogs-3.6.15-pre1 but it fails
use reiserfsprogs-3.6.19.tar.gz from
Hi,
try the attached patch please.
On Friday 21 October 2005 12:44, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hello
Konstantin Mьnning wrote:
Hi!
Just tried to add some badblocks like this:
reiserfstune -b /tmp/badblocklist /dev/hda5
and I get the error:
block allocator is not
On Saturday 15 October 2005 16:19, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Friday 14 October 2005 16:07, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Friday 14 October 2005 15:07, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
[...]
ok, I will add it.
Vitaly, is it possible to add labels
On Friday 14 October 2005 13:40, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
Recently I've changed a filesystem on one of my patitions from ext3 to
reiserfs 3.6.
All of my partitions have labels (hint: mke2fs -L) so at boot I can easily
see
which partitions are fsck-ed. So while reformatting my last
On Friday 14 October 2005 16:07, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Friday 14 October 2005 15:07, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
[...]
ok, I will add it.
Vitaly, is it possible to add labels to Reiser4 filesystems AFTER mkfs,
or only during mkfs?
only on mkfs time for now.
--
Vitaly
Hello Thomas!
On Friday 14 October 2005 19:21, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
Hi,
I had to run reiserfsck on my usb hdd because there were some problems.
It told me to rebuild the tree (because I couldn't mount it I coudlnt'
backup things and I didn't have enough space (50GB) spare for a disk
Hello
On Saturday 08 October 2005 04:21, Harry Edmon wrote:
Today 04:21:37
A disk I am trying to fix fails a reiserfsck --rebuild-tree with the
message out of space. I have enclosed the log, and the output to the
terminal. The system is running Debian sarge with all released
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 01:46, Lance Reed wrote:
Thanks for the info!
I have tried this. I made the new 3.6.19 code.
Ran a --rebuild-sb, seemed better. When I try to run a --check,
it still says that it can not read the bitmap.
So, is this problem
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 01:15, Dan Pritts wrote:
Hi,
Hello!
I just downloaded built reiserfsprogs-3.6.19 on Red Hat EL 4.
This has a newer version of RPM than you've designed your SPEC
file for, and suffers from problems described in these two URLs:
1)
'/dev/VG01/lvol0' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions
replayed
reiserfs_open_ondisk_bitmap: wrong either bitmaps number,
count of blocks or blocksize, run with --rebuild-sb to fix it
reiserfsck: Could not open bitmap
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 22:27, Lance Reed
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 22:27, Lance Reed wrote:
I seem to be stuck in a catch 22 and can not seem to rebuild a bitmap.
reiserfsck --check says the bitmap is bad.
reiserfsck --rebuild-sb says it is ok.
I do seem some errors but can not seem to repair them..
Fs state field: 0x1:
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 17:40, Fionn Behrens wrote:
Hello all,
Hello
I just wanted to tell along a bit about my recent experiences with
reiserfs. I have been using reiser3.[56] without any glitch for more
than five years and when I got a new notebook last year, I decided to
give
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 19:28, Fionn Behrens wrote:
On Mi, 2005-09-28 at 18:25 +0400, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
2.6.11 refused to boot the
root partition, claiming that there were an inconsistency in the FS.
the disk format got new parameters and old kernels cannot understand
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 21:57, Fionn Behrens wrote:
On Mi, 2005-09-28 at 20:40 +0400, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
remember that reiser4progs-1.0.4 supports both formats, in other words
having the format updated to the new one, you are able to use new
kernelonly. If you want to move back
visit:
www.namesys.com/support.html
Thanks for Your help
Markus Hiereth
Braunschweig, Germany
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
enough that the fsck had to try to
rebuild the b-tree, I take it?
loop device XOR encryption for your images is the simple solution
for reiserfs V3.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
with each other, send us an
email asking us to all try to work together, and then ask for proposals
on what we should all conform to. Distill the proposals, and then
suggest a common solution. With luck, we will all just say yes.:)
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
be happy to add any
information requested.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
to (16528)
are_file_items_correct: All bytes we look for must be first items byte
(position 0).
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(***snip***)
Hmm... Ugly ;-).
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
if some file item offsets are corrupted, fsck can work
to lose data.
Can this be suspended (ctrl ^Z)?
yes, no problem.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
)
and rebuild the journal header if needed.
I've
been running this filesystem for two years with that block size, and
am not ready to give up the data on it just yet :-).
Thanks for any help with this problem, and also for the wonderul file
system :-).
Alphanos
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
was skipped
left 32022, 500 /sec
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
/ldconfig.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
?
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
On Monday 15 August 2005 18:11, Vanuxem Grégory wrote:
Le lundi 15 aoШt 2005 Ю 17:48 +0400, Vitaly Fertman a Иcrit :
where have you installed libaal into? /usr/local?
does you /etc/ld.so.conf have the path you instatlled libaal into?
if not, add it and run /sbin/ldconfig
yet.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
that would be OK.
Keep doing the great job!
Konstantin
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
, this system is mine to play
with
until the end of the month.
Paul Slootman
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
obtained from
ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs/reiser4progs-1.0.4-1.tar.gz
contain the fix to handle the extended plugin table correctly.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 01:07, David Masover wrote:
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2005 23:46, Hans Reiser wrote:
David Masover wrote:
I was able to recover from bad blocks, though of course no Reiser that I
know of has had bad block relocation built
stable,
written by someone who asks for review by benchmark.
Michael
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
-handling.html describes
how reiserfs handles bad blocks.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
fedora.
Vitaly?
yes, I will investigate the problem.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
is being tested.
Update the tools, do something light and off we go or will we
need to mkfs?
Spatsibo!
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
it? :-)
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
/boardel/reiserfsck_rebuild_log_3.txt
http://www.euphorik.ch/boardel/reiserfsck_screendump_3.txt
looks like a hardware problem, problably memory.
I think, maybe I'll format my partition, I'm a bit desperate :/
bye !
Greg Burri
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
/support.html terms.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
is not
relevant here.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 15:01, Adrian Ulrich wrote:
Hi Vitaly,
there was a format change to work with encryption plugin in
-5 reiser4 patch. progs do not have its support yet. grub works
through the progs code so its the same problem, mkisofs is not
relevant here.
I don't think
provide the output to namesys if they need it
(9.3 MiB)
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
badblocks run, so you cannot
be sure you know the full bad block list.
and the second, if your hardware is dying you need to fix it before
running fsck on it.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
to the change.
if you need our assistance please use our www.namesys.com/support.html
service.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
?
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2005/03/21 13:15:23+03:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# use BLKBLKGETSIZE BLKGETSIZE6464 defines
#
# file.c:
# do not limit file size by 2^41 bytes
#
# configure.in:
# check for large files
and mounting it .
What should I do before I pay you to work out a solution.
thanx.
kind regardes,
Matthias.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
Package: reiserfsprogs
Version: 1:3.6.19-1
Severity: minor
The manpage describes reiserfstune as a tunning tool.
Thanks, fixed.
-- Vitaly Fertman
but no similar incident has been reported.
Thank in advance
M. A. Herrero.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
!
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
...
I already try reiserfsck but without success :'( I don't know what can I
do to repair that.
Please help me,
Thx
Greg Burri
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
with the applied reiser4 patch, it points to
ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs/grub/grub-0.96-reiser4-20040130.tar.gz
I'm stumped.
Thanks,
Chris W.
On April 28, 2005 05:06 am, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Thursday 28 April 2005 09:26, Chris Wakefield wrote:
Greetings all.
I'm attempting to setup
of such state I rebooted it with
Alt+SysRq b
as nothing else would stop it.
Then I tried touch t1 on the filesystem, with the same result.
Alt+SysRq b again.
reboot won't work, as the partition would not unmount.
only 4k blocksize seems to work now. fix is being prepared.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly
and
who knows what else .. it's just this source only.
Do I require a different source or do I have to compile reiser4 grub in a 32
bit chroot environment?
what does the plain grub-0.96 without reiser4 patch say?
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
On Saturday 19 March 2005 21:03, Jindrich Makovicka wrote:
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Friday 18 March 2005 21:59, Jindrich Makovicka wrote:
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
so 1.0.3 1.0.4 bail out. Using fsck.reiser4 --build-sb from
reiser4progs 1.0.3 rendered the filesystem created under 1.0.0
On Friday 18 March 2005 21:59, Jindrich Makovicka wrote:
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
so 1.0.3 1.0.4 bail out. Using fsck.reiser4 --build-sb from
reiser4progs 1.0.3 rendered the filesystem created under 1.0.0 unusable,
fsck.reiser4 --build-sb is supposed to fix evth. what goes wrong?
sorry
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
Hello,
what your configure tells about _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
_LARGE_FILES? if it cannot detect the right value, probably
the attached patches for configure.in would help.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:13, Naveen Nathan wrote:
Hey Reiser team fellow Reiser users.
iI
)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7da8000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f47000)
please update your libaal reiser4progs to the latest version.
(ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs/)
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
' in declaration of `__tmp'
format40.c:255: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer
without a cast
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
On Monday 21 February 2005 16:10, Ookhoi wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 01:44:41PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
The new reiser4progs package is available on our ftp
site (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs/).
Thank you for this release. It doesn't crash anymore :-)
But it does tell me
fixes in 1.0.4 regarding this?
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs/grub
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
please reply to the list. Thanks in advance.
With kind regards, Sander
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
On Friday 18 February 2005 17:08, Ookhoi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 04:19:59PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Friday 18 February 2005 11:31, Ookhoi wrote:
Are new reiser4progs available? I can only find 1.0.3 as newest,
but that version is august 2004.
I have been about
into -mm kernels. I am attaching them to this
e-mail.
and at least these 2 patches needs to applied also.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
diff -rup libaal-1.0.3/include/aal/Makefile.am libaal-1.0.3-1/include/aal/Makefile.am
--- libaal-1.0.3/include/aal/Makefile.am 2004-01-08 15:49:40.0 +0100
On Monday 14 February 2005 14:24, Rikard Johnels wrote:
On Friday 11 February 2005 08.57, Rikard Johnels wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2005 22.03, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
reiserfsck 3.6.13
I used -S to scan the whole partition, as per man page
A bug heh.. :(
So
: free_block (hda6:32998)[dev:blocknr]: bit already
cleared
---
Is there anything I can do to look for my other missing data?
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
On Monday 14 February 2005 17:40, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
Hello,
Cituojant Vitaly Fertman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reboot is required between repartitioning a drive and starting to use
moved/created partitions. without that the kernel may continue to
use
old partition table. so it would
On Monday 14 February 2005 19:38, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
Cituojant Vitaly Fertman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mkfs -t reiserfs /dev/hda6
did you shrink ntfs under win and reboot?
NTFS was shrinked several reboots ago under Linux with
ntfsresize/fdisk.
what happened
On Thursday 10 February 2005 22.03, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
reiserfsck 3.6.13
I used -S to scan the whole partition, as per man page
A bug heh.. :(
So is there any fix for it?
Please try latest reiserfsck.
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub
?
the kernel found an ext2 magic somewhere in the first 64K,
reiserfs keeps the super block on 64K offset, so ext2 one was
not overwritten by rebuild-sb. this is why it was mounted as ext2.
but why the kernel refused to mount as reiserfs when was explicitely
specified -- this is a bug.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly
On Thursday 10 February 2005 00:19, Peter Klotz wrote:
I attached a patch that fixes a few typos in reiser4progs 1.0.3.
Thanks a lot, applying it.
Vitaly Fertman
=16
can you mount it now? (rebuild-tree should already complete by the mount time).
do you have anything related in the syslog about the mount time?
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
--rebuild-tree
# debugreiserfs -p /dev/loop/0 | bzip2 -c meta.bz2
# reiserfsck -y /dev/loop/0 --rebuild-tree -S
# debugreiserfs -p /dev/loop/0 | bzip2 -c meta-S.bz2
Use ftp://80.133.138.104:12121
sorry, but I get 'no route to host' every time.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
look_for_lost: The entry 'lost+found' could not be found in the root
directory Aborted
This is getting more than frustrating...
would you pack the metadata with
debugreiserfs -p device | bzip2 -c device-meta.bz2
and provide them for downloading?
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
with:
debugreiserfs -p device | bzip2 -c device-meta.bz2
they probably will be not so large for downloading.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
On Saturday 05 February 2005 19:31, Michael Styer wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Vitaly Fertman said:
so what I do not understand is why reiserfsck does not report any
problem to you. Which reiserfsprogs do you have? have you 'umount
mount ro' or 'remount,ro', btw? reiser4 does not do 'remount
On Monday 07 February 2005 18:58, Michael Styer wrote:
On Monday, 07 February, 2005 10:38 AM Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Saturday 05 February 2005 19:31, Michael Styer wrote:
OK. So I killed everything that was keeping /usr busy and unmounted it.
I ran debugfs.reiser4 on /dev/hdb1 unmounted
3.3.4
compilation flags:
-fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers -O2
trying to reproduce it.
what packages for mipsel cross compiling have you installed?
probably some cross headers are needed also...
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
,
and the inode number (well, and the date and time, obviously).
Does that help?
would you pack the metadata with
debugfs.reiser4 -P device | bzip2 -c device.bz2
and let us to download them?
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 19:25, Michael Styer wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 19:10:15 +0300, Vitaly Fertman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
would you pack the metadata with debugfs.reiser4 -P device |
bzip2 -c device.bz2 and let us to download them?
Is it possible to do this when the device
be great to hear the whole story.
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
###
(none):~ #
Also, further testing on a 2nd mirror copied disk shows the same exact
errors even after I run it twice in a row.
Best Regards,
Rob
--
Robert Harnaga
www.GriffinRUN.com
Game server hosting for serious players
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
---BeginMessage
minutes later.
Quoting Vitaly Fertman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 23:33, Simon Raffeiner wrote:
Hi,
yesterday my workstation refused to boot Linux using a Reiser4
formatted / partition. It mocks about an error with an already cached
block and about skipping
in reiser4_root_create (fs=0xc5e18) at
mkfs.c:99
#12 0x0001339c in main (argc=3, argv=0xe5c4) at mkfs.c:467
(gdb)
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
.bz2
using 1.0.3 progs and provide it for downloading?
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
not flush the made changes on disk. And as nothing gets changed
the same attempt of fixing these nodes repeats again on the next rebuild.
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 20:25, hanasaki wrote:
Version of reiserfsk
==
== From debian sarge
/sbin/reiserfsck -V
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
