Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-30 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Diumenge, 29 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:05:20, David Faure va escriure: On Saturday 28 December 2013 17:34:35 Albert Astals Cid wrote: I guess yes, was waiting for Torgny/other people opinion on them, since they

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-30 Thread David Faure
On Sunday 29 December 2013 21:09:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote: I think you should create a kf5.0 branch in the repo, that way you can kill the pack_l10n.sh and put the correct branches in the modules.git file, etc. Well there's no l10n in TP1, but I assume there will be in the final KF 5.0

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-30 Thread David Faure
On Monday 30 December 2013 21:22:38 you wrote: Which repository do you need commit access to? sysadmin/release-tools I presume? Yes. A full copy of the XZ compressed tarballs, excluding Oxygen is 800mb for an entire SC release. Any ideas on what Zip compressed archives would take up in

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-30 Thread David Faure
On Saturday 28 December 2013 17:34:35 Albert Astals Cid wrote: In any case - yes, these scripts make a lot of sense, we should work on automating the tagging, and I can help with that. This is the silly script i have, it needs some work to integrate it better with the exisitng stuff, but

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 30 de desembre de 2013, a les 11:26:37, David Faure va escriure: On Sunday 29 December 2013 21:09:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote: I think you should create a kf5.0 branch in the repo, that way you can kill the pack_l10n.sh and put the correct branches in the modules.git file, etc.

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 30 de desembre de 2013, a les 12:40:33, David Faure va escriure: On Saturday 28 December 2013 17:34:35 Albert Astals Cid wrote: In any case - yes, these scripts make a lot of sense, we should work on automating the tagging, and I can help with that. This is the silly script

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-29 Thread David Faure
On Saturday 28 December 2013 17:34:35 Albert Astals Cid wrote: I guess yes, was waiting for Torgny/other people opinion on them, since they are not what we used to use (i.e. master and 4.11 are the old ones). If you can have a look at the old ones and agree the 4.12 ones are simpler, it'd be a

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-29 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 29 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:05:20, David Faure va escriure: On Saturday 28 December 2013 17:34:35 Albert Astals Cid wrote: I guess yes, was waiting for Torgny/other people opinion on them, since they are not what we used to use (i.e. master and 4.11 are the old ones). If

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 28 de desembre de 2013, a les 16:36:24, David Faure va escriure: On Saturday 21 December 2013 12:38:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Can I suggest removing the tr() calls in ThreadWeaver? As far as I can see they are only in setObjectName and in tests, not very useful really, so

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-22 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday 21 December 2013, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: 2013/12/21 Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org: On Saturday 21 December 2013 12:38:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Now, the hard part, how's versioning going to go now and in the future? I see you want to do a 5.0 of two frameworks and unstable of the

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-22 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Sunday 22 December 2013 11:17:51 Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Saturday 21 December 2013, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: 2013/12/21 Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org: On Saturday 21 December 2013 12:38:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Now, the hard part, how's versioning going to go now and in the future?

Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-21 Thread David Faure
So, we have these new repos that together make up the KDE Frameworks. We'd like to release them (as a technical preview for most, as a 5.0 release for KArchive and ThreadWeaver) this month. How should we proceed about this? Any checklist we should follow? Any packaging script (for making the

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 21 de desembre de 2013, a les 10:32:33, David Faure va escriure: So, we have these new repos that together make up the KDE Frameworks. We'd like to release them (as a technical preview for most, as a 5.0 release for KArchive and ThreadWeaver) this month. KArchive doesn't seem to

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-21 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Saturday 21 December 2013 12:38:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: How should we proceed about this? Easy pasrt: tarball + repo tag. Then you need to find a place to set it up in the download server. I think we should put the stable ones in http://download.kde.org/stable/ and the

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 21 de desembre de 2013, a les 13:11:25, Kevin Ottens va escriure: Hello, On Saturday 21 December 2013 12:38:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: How should we proceed about this? Easy pasrt: tarball + repo tag. Then you need to find a place to set it up in the download server.

Re: Packaging scripts for frameworks

2013-12-21 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
2013/12/21 Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org: On Saturday 21 December 2013 12:38:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Now, the hard part, how's versioning going to go now and in the future? I see you want to do a 5.0 of two frameworks and unstable of the others, so let's say 5.0.0 for karchive/threadweaver