We discussed KF5 and Plasma 5 schedules briefly, seems they are working fine,
nothing to change atm.
Applications 14.12 will be basically on the same schedule as 4.12 + 1 year
You can see it in
https://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/Applications/14.12_Release_Schedule
It was said that kdepim
Le dimanche 15 juillet 2012 16:39:54 Michael Jansen a écrit :
Let us postpone this until i have the script ready. I think the discussion
is needed but currently a bit difficult because it is all really theoritcal
now.
It is all very theoritical because people took a simple and pragmatic
Am 2012-07-16 10:14, schrieb Aurélien Gâteau:
Le dimanche 15 juillet 2012 16:39:54 Michael Jansen a écrit :
Let us postpone this until i have the script ready. I think the
discussion
is needed but currently a bit difficult because it is all really
theoritcal
now.
It is all very theoritical
El Dilluns, 16 de juliol de 2012, a les 11:47:40, i...@michael-jansen.biz va
escriure:
Am 2012-07-16 10:14, schrieb Aurélien Gâteau:
Le dimanche 15 juillet 2012 16:39:54 Michael Jansen a écrit :
Let us postpone this until i have the script ready. I think the
discussion
is needed but
I do not like maskerading pre releases as stable version. Version
numbers have a
clear semantic meaning. And KDE currently breaks that.
We break what? Our numbers have a clear sematic meaning, i can look at a
version number and tell you what it is. Agreed it's not trivial, but saying
El Dilluns, 16 de juliol de 2012, a les 22:37:24, Michael Jansen va escriure:
I do not like maskerading pre releases as stable version. Version
numbers have a
clear semantic meaning. And KDE currently breaks that.
We break what? Our numbers have a clear sematic meaning, i can look at
On Monday, July 16, 2012 10:42:11 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dilluns, 16 de juliol de 2012, a les 22:37:24, Michael Jansen va
escriure:
I do not like maskerading pre releases as stable version. Version
numbers have a
clear semantic meaning. And KDE currently breaks that.
El Dilluns, 16 de juliol de 2012, a les 23:37:12, Michael Jansen va escriure:
On Monday, July 16, 2012 10:42:11 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dilluns, 16 de juliol de 2012, a les 22:37:24, Michael Jansen va
escriure:
I do not like maskerading pre releases as stable version. Version
On 07/16/2012 03:37 PM, Michael Jansen wrote:
4.5.70 is a stable release for anyone with experience in release numbers
imo, that's a false assumption. anyone making that mistake deserves
what they get.
-- rex
___
release-team mailing list
On 07/16/2012 05:41 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
On 07/16/2012 03:37 PM, Michael Jansen wrote:
4.5.70 is a stable release for anyone with experience in release numbers
imo, that's a false assumption. anyone making that mistake deserves
what they get.
Hit enter too fast... I'm speaking mostly in
On Monday, July 16, 2012 22:37:24 Michael Jansen wrote:
I do not like maskerading pre releases as stable version. Version
numbers have a
clear semantic meaning. And KDE currently breaks that.
We break what? Our numbers have a clear sematic meaning, i can look at a
version number
On Sunday 15 July 2012 01:00:28 Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Samstag 14 Juli 2012, 23:47:29 schrieb David Faure:
On Saturday 14 July 2012 12:29:57 Michael Jansen wrote:
Why not marking an alpha, beta and rc as what it is and every other
project
out there already does? Why masking is as a
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 01:00:28 AM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Samstag 14 Juli 2012, 23:47:29 schrieb David Faure:
On Saturday 14 July 2012 12:29:57 Michael Jansen wrote:
Why not marking an alpha, beta and rc as what it is and every other
project
out there already does? Why masking is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-07-2012 11:57, Michael Jansen wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 01:00:28 AM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Samstag 14 Juli 2012, 23:47:29 schrieb David Faure:
On Saturday 14 July 2012 12:29:57 Michael Jansen wrote:
Why not marking an alpha, beta and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-07-2012 14:06, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On 15-07-2012 11:57, Michael Jansen wrote:
I provided specific numbers before to make sure we were all
talking about the same - from the above I see we are not.
When you start working on
El Diumenge, 15 de juliol de 2012, a les 14:06:32, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
va escriure:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-07-2012 11:57, Michael Jansen wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 01:00:28 AM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Samstag 14 Juli 2012, 23:47:29 schrieb David
El Diumenge, 15 de juliol de 2012, a les 16:25:23, Albert Astals Cid va
escriure:
El Diumenge, 15 de juliol de 2012, a les 14:06:32, Jorge Manuel B. S.
Vicetto
va escriure:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-07-2012 11:57, Michael Jansen wrote:
On Sunday, July 15,
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 02:10:52 PM Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-07-2012 14:06, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On 15-07-2012 11:57, Michael Jansen wrote:
I provided specific numbers before to make sure we were all
talking
On 2012-07-15, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, can you please use - and not ~. The - character has a
special meaning on versions for us. The ~ character can cause issues
for us, as we use it when specifying dependencies on other packages as
a fuzzy version
On Sunday 15 July 2012 14:56:17 Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2012-07-15, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, can you please use - and not ~. The - character has a
special meaning on versions for us. The ~ character can cause issues
for us, as we use it when specifying
On Friday 13 July 2012 14:31:35 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
To address this we proposed the following numbering scheme:
4.N.7{1,2,3} = N+1 alpha 1, 2, 3
4.N.8{1,2,3} = N+1 beta 1, 2, 3
4.N.9{1,2,3} = N+1 rc 1, 2, 3
With this scheme, 4.10 alpha 1 would be 4.9.71, 4.10 beta 2 would be 4.9.82
I
On Friday, July 13, 2012 02:31:35 PM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
So here comes the summary of the Release Team BoF, the attached picture is
all we wrote during the BoF itself so all written here is me trying to
remember what we said,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-07-2012 10:29, Michael Jansen wrote:
On Friday, July 13, 2012 02:31:35 PM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
So here comes the summary of the Release Team BoF, the attached
picture is all we
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 12:07:31 PM Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-07-2012 10:29, Michael Jansen wrote:
On Friday, July 13, 2012 02:31:35 PM Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
So
On Friday 13 July 2012 12:37:19 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On 13.07.2012 08:14, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2012 23:23:39 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dijous, 12 de juliol de 2012, a les 17:06:12, Allen Winter va
escriure:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 08:43:12 PM Albert Astals Cid
On Friday, July 13, 2012 07:44:38 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 13 de juliol de 2012, a les 14:31:35, Aurélien Gâteau va
escriure:
Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
So here comes the summary of the Release Team BoF, the attached picture
is
all
On Friday 13 July 2012 13:54:23 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, July 13, 2012 07:44:38 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 13 de juliol de 2012, a les 14:31:35, Aurélien Gâteau va
escriure:
Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
So here comes the
On Friday 13 July 2012 19.44.38 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Divendres, 13 de juliol de 2012, a les 14:31:35, Aurélien Gâteau va
escriure:
Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
So here comes the summary of the Release Team BoF, the attached picture is
all we wrote
One area this is missing is my own role as the release team list
moderator. Dirk can also do this, but I stepped in when he was finding
it hard to have the time and I doubt that has changed. At the moment I
think I'm generally keeping things flowing, but at high intensity
times like releases the
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Richard Moore wrote:
One area this is missing is my own role as the release team list
moderator. Dirk can also do this, but I stepped in when he was finding
it hard to have the time and I doubt that has changed. At the moment I
think I'm generally keeping things flowing,
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 08:43:12 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
== Note 2 ==
There is a suggestion that every feature commit should have an associated
bug number so it can be better tracked. Someone suggests trying with
frameworks when its more ready
I wonder if we could make special Big
El Dijous, 12 de juliol de 2012, a les 17:06:12, Allen Winter va escriure:
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 08:43:12 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
== Note 2 ==
There is a suggestion that every feature commit should have an associated
bug number so it can be better tracked. Someone suggests trying
I've now had 3 volunteers. Thanks to Sune, Boud and Albert we now have
this one sorted. :-)
Cheers
Rich.
On 12 July 2012 22:01, Richard Moore r...@kde.org wrote:
One area this is missing is my own role as the release team list
moderator. Dirk can also do this, but I stepped in when he was
33 matches
Mail list logo
