[Thanks Tom, for bringing this up.]
On Monday 05 March 2007 21:01:59 Cyrille Berger wrote:
That's actually fine. We can delay KDevelop release till KDE 4.1.
can't kdevelop 4.0 be released after 4.0 and before 4.1 ? I mean that what
will happen for koffice, and maybe other modules (ie kdepim)
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 10:02:24 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Dienstag 06 März 2007 schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
What do you think?
What I think? Good you asked. Because if you continue discussing on this
level we won't have another KDE release before 2012.
I like Tom's approach: Define a roadmap
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 14:59:59 Tom Albers wrote:
At Wednesday 07 March 2007 12:59, you wrote:
Coolo, can you tell us if the impact on the translations is big?
kdelibs has hardly enough messages to justify an extra kdelibs message
freeze if you as me.
thanks for the info.
I'll
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 18:11:41 Tom Albers wrote:
At Wednesday 07 March 2007 15:05, you wrote:
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 14:59:59 Tom Albers wrote:
At Wednesday 07 March 2007 12:59, you wrote:
Coolo, can you tell us if the impact on the translations is big?
kdelibs has
Hi,
I'm having trouble finding out what needs to be done to announce the 4.0
alpha1 release.
Things that are already done:
- source packages are up
- release notes, check
http://www.kde.org/announcements/visualguide-4.0-alpha1.php
- The first part is the official announcement text (the
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 19:15:20 Tom Albers wrote:
Other point, it was said that the agressive 4.0 release schedule was also
to allow devs to developp and port applications for 4.x. What is the
purpose without kdevelop and win/osx port?
I would love a win/osx port and the people working on
On Friday 25 May 2007 00:26:44 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 1:04:26 pm Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Thursday 24 May 2007 schrieb Allen Winter:
Is the 3.5 branch open for new i18n strings yet?
I personally would leave the 3.5 branch frozen for the next couple of
years.
A
On Friday 01 June 2007 16:49:10 Urs Wolfer wrote:
I'm right now not sure what to do with the kdenetwork module... Not all
apps are working very well atm. Matt Rogers (mattr) thinks that Kopete will
not be ready for 4.0. KRDC is also not ready so far. Probably I will get it
done for 4.0. I
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 22:56:13 Allen Winter wrote:
2. Change
From this date forward, a Beta Release will be published
every month until most grave bugs are resolved.
to
From this date forward, a Beta version will be tagged
every month until most grave bugs are resolved.
The actual
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 22:56:13 Allen Winter wrote:
Howdy,
Note that the Monday June 25 Beta1 Release Milestone
is fast approaching. I'd like to make the following
clarifications and date changes to the schedule:
1. First, I'd like to change the date to 26 June so that
we may have 1
On Thursday 14 June 2007 15:04:41 Allen Winter wrote:
Dirk can do the tagging either Monday 25 June or Wednesday 27 June.
If we go with the 27th, then we can squeeze in one more BIC Monday.
But that is really cutting it close.
Basically, we have the following options:
a) tagging on monday,
On Saturday 23 June 2007 16:53:35 Allen Winter wrote:
The Release Team officially announces the following changes
to the KDE4.0 Release Roadmap [1]:
* 27 June: Alpha2 Tagging
* 24 July: Core Libs API Freeze (includes kdesupport, kdelibs, kdepimlibs)
* 25 July: Beta1 Tagging
Basically, we
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 11:56:23 Dirk Mueller wrote:
I've enabled syncing of KDE4 alpha2 to the outside. Anyone want to help
with the announcement stuff? sebas volunteered but I don't know if he needs
any further help. if you want to step up, please ping me or sebas on irc.
Jos wanted to do
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 13:02:23 Cyrille Berger wrote:
- KOffice 2 alpha now part of it (Inge, any input?
no, KOffice 2 alpha will be announced seperately.
That's especially interesting to kde-promo folks, so CC:ing :-)
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID:
On Monday 09 July 2007 14:15:13 Tom Albers wrote:
At Monday 09 July 2007 13:55, you wrote:
Gamma is a real release, but not targeted at new end users (so it
really *is* 4.0, and *not* a release candidate. That thing has to be very
clear.
Now I'm confused. This is the text from Troy:
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 16:26:54 Thomas Zander wrote:
Bottom line; if fixing this problem requires certain rewrites and breaking
of stability and possibly the breaking of the API, that to me is a module
that is alpha quality.
Is someone working on this particular problem? We can happily state
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 15:44:54 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
We'll be tagging Beta1 (most probably it'll be called that) this Thursday.
That gives us roughly one week to write some sensible release notes. A few
screenshots would also be nice.
I'll not be available starting on Thursday, so we
I've seen no reaction to this email, but I think the current schedule (release
20 dec) is broken (Dirk is on vacation, it's too close to christmas for PR).
Can I at least get a shut up, you're irrelevant answer, maybe something more
promising?
On Saturday 01 September 2007 15:57:57 Sebastian
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 00:51:40 Allen Winter wrote:
On Monday 03 September 2007 10:51:37 am Sebastian Kügler wrote:
I've seen no reaction to this email, but I think the current schedule
(release 20 dec) is broken (Dirk is on vacation, it's too close to
christmas for PR).
Can I
Here's a proposal for a revised release schedule, taking into account comment
by various people over the last week. Especially Dirk being on vacation and
the release date being to close to Christmas are major flaws in the current
schedule.
I've removed beta4 since otherwise it all gets too
On Thursday 06 September 2007 15:35:17 Allen Winter wrote:
KDE Development Platform?
KDE Software Development Platform?
KDE Application Development Platform?
Or just Devkit? Less formal, more hackerish (that's our targetgroup, right?)
I'll prepare a revised revised schedule now. We can fill
On Thursday 06 September 2007 00:00:44 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
7 November (Wed): Tagging RC2
13 November (Tue): Release RC2
5 December (Wed): Tagging RC-final
11 December (Tue): Release KDE 4.0 Desktop
Planning for more than one RC is strange. The RC should be a releasable
state.
Next try (I'll start giving up on Friday night :P) ...
As Cornelius pointed out, some days were not Wednesdays. Fair enough,
everything has shifted slightly forward, also having shorter rc period (which
is what Allen suggested). That means more bugs should be fixed by the later
RCs, which is
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 12:33:27 Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
Ps. In some days, maybe we will have a good KDE pr about users and how KDE
in doing well in Africa introducing computing as a totally new directions
in this place !!
Would be nice to have a dot story about this!
--
sebas
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 15:05:19 Tom Albers wrote:
At Wednesday 19 September 2007 14:00, you wrote:
The Beta Cycle will continue until these critical products are determined
to be functional (ie. the minimum requirements):
-The workspace
Plasma (aseigo)
color configuration
On Thursday 20 September 2007 19:11:57 Allen Winter wrote:
Do you plan to take care of this?
If so, I think it makes sense to give more details about those things, that
probably makes it easier to publish the list and encourage people to work on
that, the more detailed, the better in that
Hi Tom,
On Monday 24 September 2007 13:12:46 Tom Albers wrote:
Thanks Matthias, I've added your list to the Goals on techbase, can you
check if the information is accurate?
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Release_Beta_Goals
Oh please wait with that.
Ok.
Sebas, I've sent
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 15:55:30 Dirk Mueller wrote:
7 modules are failing at the moment.
situation is a lot better now, thanks to everyone who helped. Still the
kickoff stuff hasn't been integrated yet (partly this is what I wanted to
do this week, but haven't gotten around doing it
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 15:53:21 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday, 3. October 2007, Eike Hein wrote:
http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=10004
That may not be good enough to consider this
blocker done for, but maybe his code can be
adapted for 3.5.8.
Indeed, this was
On Monday 08 October 2007 23:55:29 David Faure wrote:
Can I suggest that KDE-3.94 should wait for the main KConfig regressions to
be fixed? Not much point in releasing something completely broken :/
(I guess kmail isn't the only app affected by this)
This one is nailed. Are there other big
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 08:51:31 Stephan Kulow wrote:
I tagged, packaged and uploaded KDE 3.5.8 to be
grabbed by packagers. I would like to know if there
is some spare time left to adapt the 3.5.7 release
announcement :)
I'll take care of the announcement. When do you want to release,
On Thursday 11 October 2007 00:31:05 Allen Winter wrote:
I'm not sure if there will be more releases in the 3.5.x series... but I do
know that KDAB is on the hook for supporting the 3.5.x KDEPIM stuff
for many years to come.
Does it make sense/Is it plausible to effectively eliminate
the
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 16:27:05 Dirk Mueller wrote:
So, my current plans are:
a) fix the build
b) sort out the version number mess.
c) do a release candidate build tomorrow morning.
d) decide on the feedback (which hopefully comes :) )
Let's make it a release candidate (really meaning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 07 November 2007 09:51:50 Tom Albers wrote:
It's news to me too.
I don't think this should be done this way. kdesupport follows kdelibs
release path.
So they should not use trunk kdesupport to work on the next version. In
case they
On Thursday 08 November 2007 10:48:15 Tom Albers wrote:
Is there any need for anything in kdesupport at the moment or can we
eliminate the folder completely?
We need at least some place to develop strigi, soprano, qimageblitz (to a
lesser extent). Only having released version doesn't make
On Monday 12 November 2007 18:36:44 Matt Rogers wrote:
I'd love to see a release being tagged right before christmas. But I'd
hate to receive a release from Santa where you get the feel that the QA
Santa dwarves were on Christmas holidays already concerning the most
basic
On Monday 12 November 2007 20:49:08 Torsten Rahn wrote:
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
I would also see a release rather sooner than later.
That's certainly what we all would like to see. Still we need to check
whether it's possible to do that without releasing seriously broken stuff.
Yes. I read
Torsten,
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 23:05:24 Torsten Rahn wrote:
I'd say this is quite off base
No. It's not. Sebastian has advocated that the only way to push a project
forward means _skewing_ technical terms for release states and
_disregarding_ matter-of-fact criteria for a release.
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 21:21:47 Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 09:28:52 Dirk Mueller wrote:
I`ve tagged the current state of things as KDE 3.96. Tarballs should be
ready in a few hours.
For the desktop, I`m unsure what to do. I`m fine with naming it RC1 or
On Thursday 15 November 2007 12:46:01 Stephan Kulow wrote:
So executive summary: If you plan for only one RC, you can just as well
plan KDE 4.0.1 right away.
Good points there.
What we do with an -rc is
- raise expectations
- get more people to try it
- communicate that we're more confident
The Release Team would like to see all KDE developers get into Release Mode.
This means:
- only bugfixes
- focus on the most visible components
- do polishing changes of the user interface now
One very important point of this is that we need to stop thinking in terms of
the pieces we usually
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 11:30:49 Torsten Rahn wrote:
- QToolBox (Can someone show me what's wrong? I fail to find the issue
here)
Well,last time I checked the whole QToolBox-Widget didn't get painted at
all in Oxygen.
This means that e.g. Marble (which uses QToolBox) can't be used as
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 14:30:29 Rex Dieter wrote:
Regardless, I'd argue they should be in the loop here in any discussions
that involve any further delays in the release schedule. (CC'ing
kde-promo?)
I consider myself the contact point for them, so that's fine. Thanks for the
[CC:ing ev-marketing anyway.]
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 15:08:50 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 28.11.07 07:30:29, Rex Dieter wrote:
Andras Mantia wrote:
On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Rex Dieter wrote:
If this is absolutely the last slip, sure. Otherwise, the release
party scheduled
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 14:10:36 Matt Rogers wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 05:08:09 Tom Albers wrote:
Op Tuesday 11 December 2007 03:14 schreef u:
If Kevin wants to take over maintenance, that's fine, but making
Kompare ready for KDE 4.0 seems like a goal not reachable
On Monday 07 January 2008 13:51:27 Dirk Mueller wrote:
anyone want to start the lead on 4.1 planning? I would like to align with
the timebased schedule, which means a release around September. I think
something around April would be rather short, but I'm open to suggestions.
It is unclear to
On Monday 07 January 2008 22:22:56 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
What about doing a new minor release each 3 weeks, setting this as fixed
time? At least for the first period.
3 weeks is really much too often. We'd be tag-frozen half the time and spent a
couple of days a week rolling tarballs and
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 02:14:02 Matt Rogers wrote:
Why exactly do the distros matter when planning our releases? (I know
I've asked this and it's been explained before, but I still don't get
it. Perhaps I never will.)
Distros are the ones that get our software to the user. KDE is a 'raw'
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 11:34:39 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Matt Rogers wrote:
Not perfect, but it's a start. Comments?
I miss the following information:
a) Why was July chosen? Was it because it is 4.0 + 6months? So if it is
old release + 6months, then we go back
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 12:41:05 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Montag 07 Januar 2008 schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
Not sure about the root cause here, but Fedora, openSUSE and Ubuntu have
6 months schedules. For them, it's an advantage to have a new desktop
version
Sorry to step in, but openSUSE
On Monday 07 January 2008 15:26:21 Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
On Tue 08 Jan 2008 07:25:53 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 11:34:39 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Matt Rogers wrote:
Not perfect, but it's a start. Comments?
I miss
On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:50:14 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 13:42:50 Urs Wolfer wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 19:29:39 Stephan Binner wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 15:37:33 Allen Winter wrote:
The kwallet seems like a critical app that should always be
It's done. :-)
Congratulations everyone, and a huge thanks, especially to those behind the
screens (you know who you are!).
The release went without hitches and relatively stress-free (not counting the
tension in the air, of course). The press has the news, www.kde.org is
updated, Dot and
On Friday 11 January 2008 16:06:23 Dirk Mueller wrote:
January 30th for tagging 4.0.1?
+1
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
On Monday 18 February 2008 15:59:31 Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Freitag 15 Februar 2008 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Hi,
.. is on ktown for the packagers to grab since tuesday.
So it looks like we can start rollout :)
Is everything in place? I'd put the binary.inc and source.inc
in place
On Friday 28 March 2008 22:45:31 Tom Albers wrote:
Just uploaded them. Changes:
- kmdonkey is readded, compiles for me on hardy now
- kio_gopher is ported from KDE3 and will be shipped from now on.
Does anyone have a list with applications shipped with the extragear tarball?
I need to finish
On Saturday 29 March 2008 14:22:04 Tom Albers wrote:
Op Saturday 29 March 2008 14:18 schreef u:
On Friday 28 March 2008 22:45:31 Tom Albers wrote:
Just uploaded them. Changes:
- kmdonkey is readded, compiles for me on hardy now
- kio_gopher is ported from KDE3 and will be shipped from
On Monday 31 March 2008 15:27:31 Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 17:59:52 Dominik Haumann wrote:
Hi everyone,
according to [1] the KDE 4.1 feature plan is open until 31 March 2008.
Will spotted that the date in the release schedule is 7th April, he fixed it
in the Feature
On Monday 31 March 2008 16:08:19 Allen Winter wrote:
FWIW, we're having a plasma sprint during the same weekend (10th - 15th),
I take it we might get away with the occasional feature addition as well?
Other than that, I'm about to add Plasma features to the Feature Plan
after kicking
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 13:45:32 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Thanks for the trust
Thanks for stepping up, Friedrich.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 27 March 2008 21:36:25 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
IIRC for KDE 3.5 there was an xml file to accumulate the various
changes (specially features) that were done. Does something like that
exist for KDE 4.1 too? I mean besides the feature planning page on
techbase. Where do I find it if
20 April is the new soft freeze deadline. From the Release Schedule [R], we
learn that features you want to work on after that deadline (and that should
get into 4.1) need to be in the Feature Plan. [F]
The release team has been asked for a bit more time, there are at least two
sprints
Hi,
I'll be on vacation next week so I don't expect to have a reliable Internet
connection (nor the guts to tell my girlfriend that I have to work) to do the
release announcement for beta1 and website updating dance next Tuesday.
If anyone else can step up, please do so. I can explain and help
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 12:28:27 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hi,
I'll be on vacation next week so I don't expect to have a reliable Internet
connection (nor the guts to tell my girlfriend that I have to work) to do
the release announcement for beta1 and website updating dance next Tuesday
I've updated the Feature Plan with what seems to have made it into the Beta
release. Boy is this an impressive list.
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.1_Release_Goals
I chickened out at KDE-PIM (scary, scary long list of things) and the new
platforms (as I'm not sure about their
On Friday 27 June 2008 14:18:22 Stephan Kulow wrote:
I asked the packagers the last days and there seems to be still high
interest in the KDE 3.5 branch.
4 months have passed by now since 3.5.9 release and I would give it
after KDE 4.1 and then release 3.5.10 mid of august. What do you think?
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 19:17:38 Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 06:36:44 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Hi,
so the time of RC1 tagging has come (tonight/tomorrow). I would like to
hear comments/list of todo items from each module maintainer that would
block RC1.
(Yes,
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 13:53:56 Cyrille Berger wrote:
Is RC1 still planned for today ? I need to know to set the date of KOffice
Alpha9 and avoid doing it the same day as KDE RC1.
Yup, it'll be out later this afternoon, I guess in ~2hours.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org |
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 17:20:40 Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 10:33:45 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 15:12:07 Allen Winter wrote:
I think we should keep the same schedule from 4.1,
except time-shifted forward 6months, like so:
Sun 19 Oct: Soft
On Monday 21 July 2008 15:58:17 Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle lunedì 21 luglio 2008, Helio Chissini de Castro ha scritto:
On Monday 21 July 2008 10:32:16 Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle lunedì 21 luglio 2008, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
Dirk Mueller wrote:
Anyone around who has more eyes and ears
On Monday 21 July 2008 17:06:55 Rex Dieter wrote:
Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle lunedì 21 luglio 2008, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
One of the critical/annoying kind:
* okular: print pdf produces no output, also print to file broken :
http://bugs.kde.org/161759
Blame Trolltech, not Okular.
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 12:48:46 Dirk Mueller wrote:
There have been 20803 commits that made it into KDE 4.1 branch, 15432
translation checkins. almost 35000 commits have been done in work branches,
some of them also being merged into /trunk, so those were not even counted.
Great work
Just a reminder for those at Akademy right now, the Development Model BoF
following up Dirk's and my talk during the conference part will be held today,
between 11.00 - 12.00 in BoF room 1.
I hope to find the time next week to publish the slides along with some
explanation.
Hope to see you
On Sunday 17 August 2008 17:19:06 Matt Rogers wrote
I'm afraid I don't follow anything in the first paragraph after the
first 20 words or so. Perhaps you could clarify a bit more?
Next year's Akademy is one month earlier than this year's. This year, it
worked rather nicely, being able to
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 18:52:39 Benoit Minisini wrote:
On mardi 19 août 2008, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Dienstag 19 August 2008 schrieb Benoit Minisini:
On mardi 19 août 2008, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Montag 18 August 2008 schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 12:53
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 00:36:06 Benoit Minisini wrote:
I am currently committing patches to kicker for KDE 3.5.10.
Those won't make it int 3.5.10, but if we gather enough changes, that would
warrant a 3.5.11 in a couple of months. (I see Tobias also did a size limit
for the trash.)
Some
On Thursday 21 August 2008 14:24:13 Allen Winter wrote:
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 11:45:33 Stephan Kulow wrote:
To state it more explicit: 3.5.10 is the last KDE 3.5 release. I had to
fix two modules to even compile before I could tag it and I have _heavy_
doubts about the testing that
On Monday 25 August 2008 12:45:39 Dirk Mueller wrote:
KDE 4.1.1 tagging planned for Thursday morning (this week). I'd like to
announce the usual wednesday 23:59 UTC rule and in light of the new
bugzilla, I would like to use the kde-4.1.1-blocker keyword for tagging
bugs that have to be fixed
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 17:39:48 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2008 12:45:39 Dirk Mueller wrote:
KDE 4.1.1 tagging planned for Thursday morning (this week). I'd like to
announce the usual wednesday 23:59 UTC rule and in light of the new
bugzilla, I would like to use
On Friday 05 September 2008 15:01:48 Allen Winter wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2008 05:59:27 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
I expect KDAB will continue doing the best they can for kdepim
enterprise. But the rest of the kdepim team will be moving onto
On Sunday 14 September 2008 17:50:15 Allen Winter wrote:
I want to let everyone know that I am now employed by KDAB.
I am not currently assigned any specific KDE development tasks,
but that could change in the future.
This new job will definitely impact the amount of time I have for KDE.
I
On Thursday 30 October 2008 18:52:03 Allen Winter wrote:
On Thursday 30 October 2008 7:35:25 am Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday 29 October 2008, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Today we are supposed to get the tagging of 4.1.3 and techbase says
there are no more planned 4.1.x releases, should i
On Sunday 02 November 2008 13:29:23 Allen Winter wrote:
Here are the Release Goals for 4.2.
Please send me an update on them: keep; remove; move to 4.3 Goals
Also, please send me any 4.3 Goals that you have.
Release Goals as in unclear items?
I'm planning, as part of my prep 4.2 release to
On Monday 03 November 2008 00:43:32 Allen Winter wrote:
On Sunday 02 November 2008 4:12:29 pm Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Sunday 02 November 2008 13:29:23 Allen Winter wrote:
Here are the Release Goals for 4.2.
Please send me an update on them: keep; remove; move to 4.3 Goals
Also
Howdy, (Allen style)
Now we're in feature-freeze, I'm trying to work out what went into KDE 4.2 and
what didn't make it. First impression: It's HUGE. Really. We're looking at a
very solid and vastly improved KDE 4.2. From my personal experience, it's
already pretty stable even. With two months
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 09:22:46 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
Maybe to complement the feature list for 4.2 modules maintainers or apps
maintainers can also drop you a mail with some explanations.
For example in KDE-Edu we have KBruch which was unmaintained and has been
picked by Brazilian
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 02:08:16 Guillaume Pothier wrote:
Question: are API changes allowed after feature freeze? I'd like to
work a bit on the Solid bluetooth stuff and that will probably require
slight API changes.
Fwd to release-team ...
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org |
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 15:19:20 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Let me try to shine some light on some of the questions raised in the
should krusader move into KDE's SVN? discussion. Please reply to both
lists, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and release-team@kde.org
Which won't work because apparently you
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 23:31:23 Jonas Bähr wrote:
Since 2.0.0 would be our first KDE-4 release, it would be an
acceptable point to beginn with a blank history. Sebastian, you
mentioned possibly losing history as a disadvantage. Does this mean
there is a chance to keep our history? Under
On Friday 28 November 2008 00:21:54 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Thursday 27 November 2008 14:19:01 Allen Winter wrote:
We are nearing the KDE 4.2 Beta2 tagging in less than 2 weeks (9 Dec).
If Opensync 0.40 is not available a few days before that time, then we'll
have no choice but to
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 17:27:45 Rafael Fernández López wrote:
Why would you want to backport patches to a tag? It's either branch/
(4.1.x) or trunk (next release of that is beta2). Tags are not supposed
to change after a release, which for 4.1.80 a.k.a beta1 has happened :).
Because I
On Friday 05 December 2008 12:48:59 Tom Albers wrote:
Communicate that bugfixing is still a top priority until 4.2.0 is
released.
You said it yourself: bug fixing is top priority, why make it more
difficult? I am against prematurely thawing trunk as quite a few
developers will shift
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 23:37:43 Dirk Mueller wrote:
Beta2 tarballs tagged and uploaded. Please report any issues you might
find.
Note that kdevplatform and kdevelop does not build with those tarballs
anymore, we need a new release. I was under the impression that there is a
new
Hi Jure,
On Saturday 27 December 2008 20:57:32 Jure Repinc wrote:
I hope I'm writing to the right mailing list about this and I hope it is
not too early to answer this answer at this time.
Linux Users Group of Slovenia is planning a little KDE 4.2 release party.
We would need to reserve the
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 18:55:54 Dirk Mueller wrote:
on our road towards KDE 4.2 RC1 tagging (tonight), I've just branched KDE
4.2 into /branches/KDE/4.2 from trunk/KDE svn revision 906698 (yes, I
couldn't wait for 906700).
Any commit after 906698 that is intended to be part of KDE 4.2 has
On Monday 19 January 2009 14:27:17 Allen Winter wrote:
I guess we are still on track for 4.2.0 tagging in the next couple days?
There is the report of 1 possible show-stopper in KMail -- I will
investigate what's happening with that.
Dirk, can you send a kde-cvs-announce message reminding
On Monday 16 February 2009 21:53:26 Richard Moore wrote:
Proposed mail http://pastebin.ca/1339313
Looks fine, thanks.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Tom Albers tomalb...@kde.nl wrote:
At Monday 16 February 2009 21:33, you wrote:
We appear to have totally dropped the ball regarding
On Thursday 05 March 2009 10:42:49 you wrote:
5 марта 2009 Sebastian Kügler написал:
KDE Community Improves Desktop with KDE 4.2.1 Codenamed Cream
Hi, Sebastian. Why there are no .xdelta files for KDE 4.2.1 sources? On FTP
I see only tarballs. :(
Forwarding to the release-team list, as I
On Friday 27 March 2009 10:05:11 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
On Thursday 26 March 2009 16:00:22 Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Cyrille Berger wrote:
I talked with Casper (over irc) on what would be needed for releasing
oxygen icons. Unless I missed something, it's tag,
On Saturday 28 March 2009 01:27:58 Nuno Pinheiro wrote:
Well my issue is another as nothing to do with the issues so far.
its about control, we are creating a new kde3.x mess couse aplications are
creating their hown versions of the same icons, and not teling any one they
do so, couse well
1 - 100 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
