Re: 3.35/3.36 schedule vs moving Tarballs Due to Fridays

2019-09-06 Thread mcatanzaro
In the end, we agreed to use Saturday for the tarball deadlines. There are other changes to the schedule: * No more overall release date, except for the stable .0 release. We'll have only tarball deadlines on the schedule and the overall release will come when it arrives. * New translator

Re: 3.35/3.36 schedule vs moving Tarballs Due to Fridays

2019-09-06 Thread mcatanzaro
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 7:02 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: * 12 months of stable releases; this means the schedule will be 18 months total rather than 6 BTW this was the one remaining topic I wanted to discuss before proposing a new schedule. We agreed at GUADEC on 12 months of stable

Third Epiphany freeze break request

2019-09-06 Thread mcatanzaro
Hi, Adrian found an integer underflow that breaks the adblocker in incognito mode: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/merge_requests/423/diffs Would be great to have another freeze exception to fix this. Michael ___ release-team@gnome.org

Doc team notifications of freeze breaks

2019-09-06 Thread mcatanzaro
Hi, Historically, our rules for freezes have required notifying gnome-doc-list@ of any freeze breaks. This rule has not always been followed (I'm a flagrant violator myself). Since nowadays documentation operates on a longer cadence (generally years rather than months), I think it really

Re: 3.35/3.36 schedule vs moving Tarballs Due to Fridays

2019-09-06 Thread mcatanzaro
I've been experimenting here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/releng/commit/b8cc54884dfd28d5f18637e2f801e3055a8641ec And here: https://wiki.gnome.org/MichaelCatanzaro/ScheduleTest Changes: * One fewer week between newstable .0 and the .1, to help Fedora and potentially Ubuntu take the .1

GNOME 3.33.92 (GNOME 3.34rc2) RELEASED

2019-09-06 Thread Javier Jardón
Hi, The second release candidate for 3.34 is here! Remember this is the end of this development cycle; enjoy it as fast as you can, the final release is scheduled next Wednesday! Also, the 3.34beta flatpak runtime has been pushed to flathub if you want to give it a try. We will try to make it

Re: Second Epiphany freeze break request

2019-09-06 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On , mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:14 PM, Javier Jardón wrote: One approval for you Any seconds? I thought I sent mine, but it seems I left it in the drafts. 2/2 approval. Ciao, Emmanuele. ___ release-team@gnome.org

Re: Third Epiphany freeze break request

2019-09-06 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On , Andre Klapper wrote: On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 08:41 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: Adrian found an integer underflow that breaks the adblocker in incognito mode: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/merge_requests/423/diffs Would be great to have another freeze exception to fix this.

Re: Second Epiphany freeze break request

2019-09-06 Thread mcatanzaro
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:14 PM, Javier Jardón wrote: One approval for you Any seconds? ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Third Epiphany freeze break request

2019-09-06 Thread Andre Klapper
On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 08:41 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > Adrian found an integer underflow that breaks the adblocker in > incognito mode: > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/merge_requests/423/diffs > > Would be great to have another freeze exception to fix this. r-t approval 1 of