Lupu
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 05:14
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: No religious advertisements on municipal buses
Perhaps Lehman is not such good law anymore -- only a plurality opinion, and
it says the buses are not a public forum (more like a commercial
I saw a newspaper story a few days ago (I'm sorry, but I don't recall all the
details) reporting that a city prohibited all religious advertising on buses
because people were annoyed with advertisements expressing a message by
Atheists suggesting that there is no G-d. Wouldn't that regulation
Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses
I saw a newspaper story a few days ago (I'm sorry, but I don't recall all the
details) reporting that a city prohibited all religious advertising on buses
because people were annoyed with advertisements expressing a message by
Atheists
I assume Fort Worth was relying on Lehman v. Shaker Heights (1974), which held
that a bus system can accept commercial advertising and exclude all political
advertising.
Lehman assumed that a commercial/political line did not involve viewpoint
discrimination. Alan is of course right that
...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein,
Alan
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 1:35 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses
I saw a newspaper story a few days ago (I'm sorry, but I don't
recall all the details) reporting
] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 1:35 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses
I saw a newspaper story a few days ago (I'm sorry, but I don't recall all
the details) reporting that a city prohibited all
: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 12:13 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses
The problematic case is Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights
...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein,
Alan
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 1:35 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses
I saw a newspaper story a few days ago (I'm sorry
...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 12:13 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses
The problematic case is Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights; if a city can
ban political ads from a bus, presumably
-Original Message-
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 12:13 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses
The problematic case
10 matches
Mail list logo