Dear Marty,
As we've discussed a few times during the all this (and I have nothing to
do, to be clear, with Notre Dame's litigation), I don't regard the opt-out
arrangement (or, for that matter, Ms. Davis's role as a clerk) as involving
culpable cooperation with wrongdoing. (That I don't regard
I agree with Rick that Judge Posner did not comport himself well (or
usefully) at oral argument. I also agree that Notre Dame has not said--not
clearly, anyway--that it would object if the *government* provided its
students and employees with coverage in a way that did not involve Notre
Dame's
Rick: Thank you. Yes, you have previously confirmed that you do not share
ND's surprising view of Catholic doctrine of cooperation with evil; and I
thank you for being so forthright about that.
But do you think that *Notre Dame's decision-makers *truly believe what its
lawyers are representing,
lawp...@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Conlawprof list multiple delayed posts -- Re: Notre Dame diversion
This morning the conlawprof listserv system notified me that six posts had been
held up. The reason is that there were too many addressees. The list software
is designed to screen out email bl
