All I have found is her dissent in Hankins v Lyght. Not much for
Sekulow to hang his hat on there. I would think he would be glad for
her clear embrace of the ministerial exception, even if she doesn't
sound thrilled about the scope of RFRA as the majority framed it.
Hardly supports his cla
The unanimous 10 commandments case Sekulow refers to is obviously
Summum--and that case by its very terms decided no Establishment Clause
issue. Nothing like honest reporting. As to her opinions,is he possibly
referring the Bronx Household of Prayer case (in either the Court of
Appeals or the Distr
I just don't understand this. Does Jay not understand that he just made the
case for Sotomayer stronger? With Specter (who is not hostile to the Est Cl)
now among the Democrats and a 60th vote to avoid a filibuster, complaining she
is strong on sep of church and state is playing to her strengt
