Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: bigotry and sincere religious belief
Let me try to respond to Chip's post. He asks two basic questions. (1) Why
should we be any more willing to accommodate religious objectors to same-sex
marriage than we are willing to accommodate religious
Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* RE: bigotry and sincere religious belief
Let me try to respond to Chip's post. He asks two basic questions. (1) Why
should we be any more willing to accommodate religious objectors to
same-sex marriage than we are willing to accommodate religious
Academics
Subject: Re: bigotry and sincere religious belief
Greg Sisk's post re: how to think about the wedding photographer is just the
compelled speech argument one more time. In the case of a photographer, a
First A claim of compelled speech is plausible, though not entirely persuasive
I think that the politics of the moment, and the conversations we have been
having (including the reference to Jim Oleske's provocative article about
religious objections to inter-racial marriage compared to religious
objections to same sex marriage, *Interracial and Same-Sex Marriages:
Similar
I'm not sure how easily it could be done, but we ought to try on some level
to protect the sincere religious beliefs
Because attempts to enforce by legal sanctions, acts obnoxious to go great
a proportion of Citizens, tend to enervate the laws in general, and to
slacken the bands of Society. If
vs.
sincere religious belief problem before writing any more. This is a
delicate question, but it seems to me that it lies at the heart of
discussions we have been having.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, tznkai tzn...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how easily it could be done, but we ought
) to the bigotry vs. sincere
religious belief problem before writing any more. This is a delicate question,
but it seems to me that it lies at the heart of discussions we have been having.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, tznkai
tzn...@gmail.commailto:tzn...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Ira Lupu
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 12:15 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: bigotry and sincere religious belief
I'm very pleased that my former
I also do not have any answers - especially on the underlying issue. But let me
make two points about the bigotry vs. sincere religious belief question.
1) Does it change the argument any if one operates from the assumption
that racism, despite our best efforts, continues to be tolerated
(m)
From: tznkai tzn...@gmail.com
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: bigotry and sincere religious belief
I'm not sure how easily it could be done, but we ought
University
1 East Campus Drive
Baton Rouge, LA 70803-0106225-578-0894225-578-0894 (of)518-605-0296518-605-0296 (m)From: tznkai tzn...@gmail.com To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:39 AM Subject: Re: bigotry and sincere
I get that religious people do not want to be discriminated against. Indeed,
they have lots of protections in the laws already protecting them from
discrimination in employment, public accomodations, and so on. And they have
lots of special treatment in the form of exemptions from laws that
, 2014 5:11 PM
To: Law Religion Law List
Subject: Re: bigotry and sincere religious belief
Importance: Low
I get that religious people do not want to be discriminated against. Indeed,
they have lots of protections in the laws already protecting them from
discrimination in employment, public
entirely sincere,
religious tenets.
sandy
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Kahn, Robert A.
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:30 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: bigotry and sincere religious belief
I
, 2014 5:11 PM
*To:* Law Religion Law List
*Subject:* Re: bigotry and sincere religious belief
*Importance:* Low
I get that religious people do not want to be discriminated against.
Indeed, they have lots of protections in the laws already protecting them
from discrimination in employment
-boun...@lists.ucla.edumailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edumailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 5:11 PM
To: Law Religion Law List
Subject: Re: bigotry and sincere religious belief
As Chip notes, there are profound difficulties in trying to use law as a
instrument to sort the sincere objectors from the bigots and phobes. And
until recently, our consistent approach to antidiscrimination laws and
religious accommodations implicitly recognized what Chip ultimately
concludes
...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Steven Jamar
*Sent:* Thursday, February 27, 2014 5:11 PM
*To:* Law Religion Law List
*Subject:* Re: bigotry and sincere religious belief
*Importance:* Low
I get that religious people do not want to be discriminated against
Lupu [icl...@law.gwu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 6:45 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: bigotry and sincere religious belief
I think that the politics of the moment, and the conversations we have been
having (including the reference to Jim Oleske's provocative article
19 matches
Mail list logo
