I located the roadmaps for the 45 and 100 watt PA sections.
I will give them to Mike for duplication and posting on RB.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any word on locating the road maps yet ?
The PSC1422 PS is repaired now. See previous post.
I
I'd bet the bigger hurdle would be convincing the users to
adapt all those individual radio to add tone encoders. There's
a lot of ancient hardware in use on 10m.
If there's known local activity in the area... people will try to
find and use equipment that makes the machine. It's hard
kb1we6r wrote:
Why oh why did they pick 100KHz??? The 10m band is HUGE with no
activity (even when the band is open, there should be plenty of room
for a better repeater plan).
Keith, WE6R in Monterey CA
Nope-FM is only allowed above 29.500, so we only have 29.5-29.7 for ANY
FM
Ken Arck wrote:
Ooops, dropped a 2 from the Ebay item number. Here's the correct one
280185868722
Ken
Guy also has an old Aerotron handheld he's trying to sell as an
AEROTRON FM VHF BASE STATION RADIO.
|cP
Jim,
I'd be interested to know where in part 97 you find any restriction on FM below
29.5. (Without debating it, of course.) ARRL bandplan, yes, but FCC rules?
Keith, we're also stuck with band-planning on other bands which didn't
anticipate the popularity of FM repeaters. 2m is even more
And that handheld looks a lot like the Repco unit I went to school on. It
was either their 10-8 or 10-2 series. Repco sold these under a lot of
different names. They could not sell them under their own name due to
contract with the buyers.
These sold under the RCA, Aerotron, Wabco and about
The Grinch emailed me direct to say say he has the
following plans for you in 2008:
[The Unofficial list]
A simplex repeater parrot on your previously dead quiet
input frequency.
A new high-power co-channel repeater in the next county
operating in carrier squelch on your frequency. Just to
Actually, FM is allowed anywhere on HF. You just have the keep the
modulation index less than or equal to 1.
It's REPEATERS that are only allowed above 29.500 MHz.
Joe M.
wd8chl wrote:
kb1we6r wrote:
Why oh why did they pick 100KHz??? The 10m band is HUGE with no
activity (even when
Originally, repeaters were only legal on 146 MHz, I think.
I know techs didn't have access to the ones on 147 MHz at first.
Joe M.
Paul Plack wrote:
Jim,
I'd be interested to know where in part 97 you find any restriction on
FM below 29.5. (Without debating it, of course.) ARRL bandplan,
...Your club elected a tech-challenged board, and they don't see any reason to
pay more than the cost of the great new Casio nickel-coated-PVC duplexers!
Merry Christmas!
73,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: skipp025
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday,
Just in time for Christmas too, What a present. Thanks and looking forward to
seeing the post on the RB site.
--
Doug
N3DAB/WPRX486/WPJL709
sgreact47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=
I located the roadmaps for the 45 and 100 watt PA sections.
I will give them to Mike for
At 12:10 PM 12/25/07, you wrote:
The Grinch emailed me direct to say say he has the
following plans for you in 2008:
[The Unofficial list]
(big chomp cut out)
The co-located Broadcast Station increases power.
And the new engineer doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground.
ATT becomes
I like the idea of a local drunk trouble-making ham who has
a tape recorder on your repeater input frequency and has
figured out most of your repeater controller commands.
And I thought, when I was a repeater trustee, that I had all of the troubles
in the world . . . . .
Don, KD9PT
-
Read the posts here already and wish to clarify a few things. First I
am in the process of converting a Q202G from the 160mhz range down
into the 2m band, specifically 144.7500/145.3500Mhz. I have found
that I will need to replace the harness to do this as it will not tune
down that far.
1. I
Now the ATC part is Not Funny!
Merry Christmas,
Jim
---
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
At 12/23/2007 23:52, you wrote:
Bob, those 1/12 wave lenths are prety short, I figuerd (in my head)
about 6 for 2 meter ham band. That may be hard to make, and to test.
Did Puff give any dimentions?
No, but it's easy to figure out: if 1/4 wavelength in typical coax is ~13,
then 1/12 wavelength
wpp3 wrote:
Read the posts here already and wish to clarify a few things. First I
am in the process of converting a Q202G from the 160mhz range down
into the 2m band, specifically 144.7500/145.3500Mhz. I have found
that I will need to replace the harness to do this as it will not tune
down
Bill,
This topic has been addressed several times in recent years. There is no
formula for the harness; Sinclair makes two harnesses, one with 12
between tees, and another (for the 136-150 MHz split) with 14 between tees.
The coupling loops are identical between splits; the harness is the only
Hello All,
I am putting up a UHF repeater in Seattle and have a question
regarding feedline losses.The repeater site is on top of a
building and the distance from where the repeater/duplexer will be
located is less than 25 feet of coax distance away from the antenna
mount.
Of course I
Just go get some 1/2 suplerflex and call it good.
Willis M. Hagler wrote:
Hello All,
I am putting up a UHF repeater in Seattle and have a question
regarding feedline losses. The repeater site is on top of a
building and the distance from where the repeater/duplexer will be
located is
Jay is correct. A 25 foot length of LDF4 (1/2 Anrdew) would be good
and have about 0.4 db loss. It's also pretty good for felxability. I
just picked Andrew since I had that spec sheet handy. Other brands
would also be good.
Most adpaters will be in the 0.2 db loss area at 450 MHz. Obviously
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim - you meant to say Repeaters are allowed above 29.500, not FM. FM is
allowed above 29.000 MHz.
LJ
No, the only thing I should've added was 'wide-band' FM, ie, anything
that occupies more bandwidth then a normal AM signal.
Paul Plack wrote:
...Your club elected a tech-challenged board,
...and they all actually believe that the made-for-ham repeater
equipment is better then commercial grade Motorola or GE simply because
it's newer.
Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
I wish !!!
I've got Verizon now (formerly the Great Telephone Experiment)
Generally Trashy Electronics...
At 12/25/2007 21:19, you wrote:
Hello All,
I am putting up a UHF repeater in Seattle and have a question
regarding feedline losses. The repeater site is on top of a
building and the distance from where the repeater/duplexer will be
located is less than 25 feet of coax distance away from the
25 matches
Mail list logo
