RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread David Jordan
I recently opened up a Polyphaser unit we used on one of our remote sites. it covered both 2m and 70cm. We were experiencing poor receive at the site. Replaced the unit and receiver sensitivity is once again hot. Anyone want pics of the insides respond direct and I'll ship you the photos.not

[Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser EOL ?

2010-08-05 Thread David Jordan
Hi folks, We noticed reduced sensitivity at one of our remote receivers recently. Went out to check things. All looked good. SWR to the receive antenna was good. Check it with and w/o Polyphaser in line. Replaced Polyphaser and tested again. same SWR but sensitivity much improved. Is this

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Hygain in Starkville MS

2010-08-04 Thread David Jordan
MFJ bought both Cushcraft and Hy-GAIN.too bad the didn't grab Telrex before they went under ;-( _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tommy Dow Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 2:44 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Hygain in Starkville MS

2010-08-04 Thread David Jordan
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Hygain in Starkville MS Telrex didn't fall into the Mighty Fine Junk category! de Lee K4LJP 73 On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:21 PM, David Jordan wa3...@comcast. mailto:wa3...@comcast.net net wrote: MFJ bought both Cushcraft

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GMRS License Help

2010-07-28 Thread David Jordan
Sounds like bogus information. why not just surf the FCC web site and quantify the rumor! _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Fuggitaboutit Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 3:54 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject:

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Converting the Kenwood TKR-820 to use with D-STAR

2010-06-29 Thread David Jordan
HAHA D-STAR doesn't provide amateur radio price points either.D-STAR is off the shelf which makes it popular for appliance operator/trustees who want to tinker with digital as compared to digging into a P-25 mode and upgrade which takes significant technical skills when compared to appliance

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Converting the Kenwood TKR-820 to use with D-STAR

2010-06-29 Thread David Jordan
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 1:50 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Converting the Kenwood TKR-820 to use with D-STAR --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com , David

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Converting the Kenwood TKR-820 to use with D-STAR

2010-06-29 Thread David Jordan
No argument on more going on with D-STAR you can see it happening now.loads of used D-STAR equipment for sale on club swap and shop list, ebay, etc. _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 3:28

RE: [Repeater-Builder] D-Star Was: Molotora Gontor

2010-04-02 Thread David Jordan
D-STAR may not be adopted by the majority of VHF/UHF users until the end-user gear prices drop significantly. I think there will be too few users to justify the efforts of a trustee or club to migrate to D-STAR/digital. One D-STAR follower noted 12,000 units sold globally. That number of unit

[Repeater-Builder] FW: FCC Update - Amateur Radio Rules

2010-03-24 Thread David Jordan
Some good news from the FCC for Public Safety Oriented Trustees _ From: Robert Kenny [mailto:robert.ke...@fcc.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 1:55 PM To: David Jordan Subject: FCC Update - Amateur Radio Rules Dave, I just wanted to update on developments on the amateur radio

[Repeater-Builder] Commercial Antenna for 2m Repeater Question

2010-03-22 Thread David Jordan
Hi Folks, Our club has been given permission to use one of the Public Safety antennas for our 2m repeater. The antenna is a PD-220-3A 150.5-158.5MHz. Our repeater freq. is 146.745. The antenna is fed with some nice looking Cell Flex LCF-12-50 ju, hard-line. The PD-200 is one of those totally

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Commercial Antenna for 2m Repeater Question

2010-03-22 Thread David Jordan
Hi Chuck, We couldn't do a proper test this weekend. The hard-line had its connector cut-off and we didn't have a compatible connector for this type hard-line. Ordering a connector today. I'm guessing about 3:1 but won't know for sure till we get some RF into it. Best, dave _

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Commercial Antenna for 2m Repeater Question

2010-03-22 Thread David Jordan
but no longer needed. Kb0wlf From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Jordan Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 9:13 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Commercial Antenna for 2m Repeater Question Hi

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Copper pipe rather than 2/0 copper wire

2010-03-16 Thread David Jordan
Strap meaning solid copper, not copper or silver tinned braid. However, one might argue that the copper tubing has an equal amount of surface area and is more robust than the thin copper strap being sold.. if you fold 3” wide copper strap into a piece of tubing you get a ¾” OD tube. So, does the

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Copper pipe rather than 2/0 copper wire

2010-03-16 Thread David Jordan
Softdrawn copper tubing comes in spools of 25-50-100ft. _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric Lowell Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 12:10 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Copper pipe

[Repeater-Builder] Super Station MasterPD-220 -3A 150.5-158.5 mHz

2010-03-16 Thread David Jordan
Hi Folks, Recently I read a note from a member of this list regarding retuning dipole elements of a commercial exposed dipole antenna, for 2m. Has anyone attempted same for subject type antenna? 73, Dave Wa3gin

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band

2010-03-05 Thread David Jordan
, but for the precedent that it creates. This is the equivalent of special legislation that benefits a single corporate entity. WalterH --- In Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com, David Jordan wa3...@... wrote: Joe, I'd put them in the Licensed

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band

2010-03-04 Thread David Jordan
I just read the FCC order.I don't see a significant threat to amateur radio UHF communications from this device. - the price is very high for what you get - few will be purchased - the technology implementation is lam - the incidents where the device would be used are few

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band

2010-03-04 Thread David Jordan
. David Jordan wrote: I just read the FCC order.I don't see a significant threat to amateur radio UHF communications from this device. - the price is very high for what you get - few will be purchased - the technology implementation is lam - the incidents where

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band

2010-03-04 Thread David Jordan
Richard, The FCC has always had that option to re-assign spectrum.you use the term our frequency which implies you think we have some implied rights to utilize the spectrum. We have no rights, just privileges. The FCC can change those privileges any time they want, as they have just done in

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band

2010-03-04 Thread David Jordan
] Re: Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band The premise is common sense, but, as you say, this is the government. Where would *you* put TV transmitters if not in the TV bands? Joe M. David Jordan wrote: I don't think there is any premise or as you say, ...fact that it should

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band

2010-03-04 Thread David Jordan
the Amateur 70cm Band On 3/4/2010 1:54 PM, David Jordan wrote: I just read the FCC order.I don't see a significant threat to amateur radio UHF communications from this device. It's operating on a ham band at more than flea power-maybe as much as several watts. How can it NOT interfere

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band

2010-03-03 Thread David Jordan
Ah George, Don't worry! The first time the device fails to deliver the goods to the Public Safety guys, they'll stop using it. Good luck to them. They'll have fun running up against the 1,000watt erp of many 70cm repeaters. 73, Dave Wa3gin _ From:

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band

2010-03-03 Thread David Jordan
There are plenty of options.the FCC has set aside spectrum just for Public Safety and such devices, but they need input from us or all they hear is the vendor biased story.not sure why the FCC felt compelled to allow this request. Perhaps the vendor was concerned about building attenuation. I

RE: [Repeater-Builder] kendecom repeaters on 220

2009-10-22 Thread David Jordan
Why don't you call the factory! They are very helpful if you don't keep them on the phone too long. _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Custer Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:02 PM To:

RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread David Jordan
Here in Arlington County, VA OEM/RACES we have two Internet Remote Amateur Radio (IRAR) Stations build around the Kenwood TS2K w/ 80-6M and 2m-70cm antennas. Our RACES volunteers check-in to the weekly exercise nets using the IRAR stations when they are traveling for business or just for fun.

RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread David Jordan
Well, the operator knows that EL broadcast immediately after the IP connection is established. SO, in my view the operator should know better than to place the radio on top of a net freq. I'm speaking of 'control' operator, not the user at the remote end of the Internet connection. Best,

RE: [Repeater-Builder] HF Remote Bases - Illegal?

2009-09-04 Thread David Jordan
: EL is just another control link method - in his case land line. That said, EL should be smart enough to not transmit on active frequencies. That's a shortcoming of EL or the interfacing, not necessarily the operator. Joe M. David Jordan wrote: Here in Arlington County, VA OEM/RACES

RE: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: EOC Frequencies Available?

2009-08-31 Thread David Jordan
I think the requirement over here is Technician class. _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of dmur...@verizon.net Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 9:20 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Cc: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: EOC Frequencies Available?

2009-08-31 Thread David Jordan
That was a good recommendation whoever made it. I heard NAVY MARS has been shut-down. Please go direct on further discussion about MARS.doesn't have much to do with repeaters. dave _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Mastr II Repeater Controller Recommendation

2009-08-25 Thread David Jordan
I have four of the ARCOM controllers and have had excellent performance. Ken is responsive when asked reasonable questions even though the answers are in the manual, haha. Best, Dave Wa3gin _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On