[Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor squelch chip vs other options (detection time)

2005-06-07 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Bob, > > I was hoping to find a clean control with <3mS, > which means the Micor Chip will probably work. > > Someone posted a blurb about working with the S-Com 7k > and it's relatively slow audio gating

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Dayton check list

2005-05-19 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Dave VanHorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 11:58 AM 5/18/2005, Ken Arck wrote: > > >At 12:56 PM 5/18/2005 -0400, you wrote: > > >Anyone taking bets on how high the gas prices will mysteriously raise > > >for the weekend? I'm betting $2.37. Not that it's g

[Repeater-Builder] Re: CWID

2005-05-13 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Larry, > You might want to check out the ID-O-MATIC that is sold by N0AXS. > This little Kit will run you about $20 bucks and works like a champ! > Nice. Like the K1EL K-ID PIC but with the activity timer. Wish I had

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Desense

2005-05-13 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Kevin Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Lemmon wrote: > > >The most recent instance was with a Cushcraft ARX-270 2m/440 antenna. > > > > I tried one of these antennas first as a low profile repeater antenna, > then as a remote base antenna. I was

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Speaking of Dayton...

2005-05-12 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would be remiss if I didn't issue an invitation to my fellow > repeater-heads who are making the pilgrimage to the Mecca of > RF-Related-Stuff in Southwest Ohio next week to be sure to look for me. > > I'll be the middle

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Xtal sources West Xtal

2005-04-29 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Kevin Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bob Dengler wrote: > > >I believe ICM & Bomar only change these mid-range capacitors. > > > > I have purposely marked the TC caps in several MASTR II ICOM's and MICOR > channel elements before sending them to BOMA

[Repeater-Builder] Re: repeater coax duplexer leads

2005-03-12 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Coy Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, Run what ever it takes to get from the radio to the duplexer. > If the amp doesn't match the duplexer then build what some call a Z > matcher it is a Pi network and consists of 2 veriable caps and 1 > in

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Hamtronics, Inc.

2005-03-12 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Neil McKie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > skipp025 wrote: > > ... snip ... > > > The Mitrek version of this bare bones radio was sold > > as a Motrek... same pc board, less parts. "Great taste, > > less filling". > > Then there i

[Repeater-Builder] Re: 220 Repeater

2005-01-21 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mike Morris WA6ILQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >A properly converted commercial radio might be better in > >the end, but is a lot more work. > > Also true - but try and find a 13-509 these days. Back in the > '80s there were many sources. These days t

[Repeater-Builder] Re: 220 Repeater

2005-01-21 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mike Morris WA6ILQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > They were built as cheap as CBs of the era, and > on the same production lines. But we hams built > repeaters out of them because that's all there was. > This may be all true, but the proven track recor

[Repeater-Builder] Re: 220 Repeater

2005-01-19 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, DCFluX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am intrested in the conversion procedure for the squelch, I am not > happy with the audio quality of the midland as well. I was working on > a new squelch board my self but too busy to sit down and build it then > wri

[Repeater-Builder] Re: EPLRS System gone/moved

2005-01-15 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The EPLRS System at Travis AFB (Northern California) > has moved (gone) from the Repeater Portion of the > 420-450 band. > > skipp > skipp025 at yahoo.com Skipp: Do you know exactly when this happened? We h

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Mobile Duplexers

2005-01-14 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > I really don't want to argue with you, but it can > be done and I've done it numerous times. It all > comes down to a number game (the specs) and a > reasonable approach. I'd like to see the specs

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Mobile Duplexers

2005-01-14 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some of the newer flat pack duplexers will do it. they will go down to 400 > kHz but you are limited to 50 watts and you only get 60 to 70 DB but if you > are using a couple of HT's it will work OK around a Hamfest. > 73

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Mobile Repeaters?

2004-12-31 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Dakota Summerhawk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Portables are great but I need the 35W (UHF) and the 50W (VHF) out to assure > that the coverage is adequate. > Thanks for the suggestion. > Dakota The G.E. MVPs will do 30 watts on 2 meters & 25 on 440. I

[Repeater-Builder] Re: UHF Distance with 20 watts to Mobile, How Far

2004-12-25 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well your antenna has less then unity (DBD) in the real world so on the Of course, this is an incorrect statement. To answer Mathew's question: the coverage would depend greatly on your terrian & foliage density (lots

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Help with circulator specs

2004-11-25 Thread no6b1
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Joe Ciarcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bob it may be the same one. It measures 9 X 9 1/4 inches and is fairly heavy. > The output to input port loss is 20 dB at the ends of it's coverage and 40 dB > at the tuned frequency. The 3 dB bandwidth is about 3 M