Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So Cal :-)

2007-02-26 Thread Jim B.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You laugh, but with the use of Time Division Multiplex it may be possible to transmit and receive on the same frequency in different time slots. It may not be that far fetched. 73, Joe, k1ike Technically, it's not full duplex when you do that. You transmit a

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So Cal :-)

2007-02-24 Thread Mike Morris
At 10:20 PM 02/23/07, you wrote: PL is no cure for interference or desence, it just hides it until someone actually tries to use the repeater. Yep. All the more reason to require PL'd inputs and make sure that systems don't have compatible PL tones with the one on the reverse... I never

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So Cal :-)

2007-02-24 Thread Dick
Now, where did I put those plans for a single-frequency rptr? LOL 73, Dick W1NMZ - Original Message - From: Mike Morris WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: 23 February, 2007 16:03 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So Cal :-)

2007-02-24 Thread k1ike_mail
those plans for a single-frequency rptr? LOL 73, Dick W1NMZ - Original Message - From: Mike Morris WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: 23 February, 2007 16:03 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So Cal :-) At 03:27 PM 02

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So Cal :-)

2007-02-24 Thread Dick
Yup...it's already being done on some of the military stuff I work with...TDMA CDMA 73, Dick - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: 24 February, 2007 15:07 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So Cal

[Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So Cal :-)

2007-02-23 Thread skipp025
Hi Mike, Even more fun is the frequent band openings. One repeater in the SF Bay Area will lock up its reverse co-channel So Cal machine. Both have no practical time-out timers. Happens more than a few times a month... sometimes a few times in one week. I can't help it if you guys are

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So Cal :-)

2007-02-23 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 03:27 PM 02/23/07, you wrote: Hi Mike, Even more fun is the frequent band openings. One repeater in the SF Bay Area will lock up its reverse co-channel So Cal machine. Both have no practical time-out timers. Happens more than a few times a month... sometimes a few times in one week. Yep.

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440-450 band plan (The normal North vs So Cal :-)

2007-02-23 Thread DCFluX
PL is no cure for interference or desence, it just hides it until someone actually tries to use the repeater. Yep. All the more reason to require PL'd inputs and make sure that systems don't have compatible PL tones with the one on the reverse...