[Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS highpass filter paper

2008-09-19 Thread skipp025
could easily be built up on a small circuit board to give a 2175 notch, with a very sharp response. Could probably build one up for $20 or so. > > Joe > > --- On Thu, 9/18/08, ka1jfy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: ka1jfy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Repeater-

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS highpass filter paper

2008-09-18 Thread Joe Montierth
]> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS highpass filter paper To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, September 18, 2008, 9:40 PM Hi All,   Please note some items that should be considered when making a "commercial version" 2175 notch filter.   N

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS highpass filter paper

2008-09-18 Thread scomind
ter, that same chip could easily be built up on a small circuit board to give a 2175 notch, with a very sharp response. Could probably build one up for $20 or so. Joe --- On Thu, 9/18/08, ka1jfy wrote: From: ka1jfy Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS highpass filter paper To: [EMAI

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS highpass filter paper

2008-09-18 Thread Joe Montierth
-Builder] Re: CTCSS highpass filter paper To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, September 18, 2008, 3:17 PM Not real interested in a PL filter, but my agency [hello Joe M] would be REAL interested in a commercial version of the notch filter. We currently

[Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS highpass filter paper

2008-09-18 Thread ka1jfy
Not real interested in a PL filter, but my agency [hello Joe M] would be REAL interested in a commercial version of the notch filter. We currently put either a Vega passive [$150] or Midian active [$60] 2175 notch in every repeater we build up. Walter KD7BJJ Phoenix, AZ --- In Repeater-Builde

[Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS highpass filter paper

2008-09-14 Thread sgreact47
Thank you for the pointer to Virgil's well done article. This should help others to understand the CTCSS tone feedthru that plagues a lot of repeaters. And thank you Virgil...excellent work. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip > There was a discussion on Repeater-Builder a while ago about the > advan