--- Glenn Little WB4UIV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With the finger printing software out now, yes, by
looking at the display
or printed data, the individual radio can be
identified. I do not mean that
they can tell the difference between a MICOR and a
MASTR. That is easy.
They can
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MASTR II mobile conversion question
Mathew Quaife wrote:
I generally don't get involved in online dicussions such as this, but I
will
have to concur on what Russ said, as I personally called
-
From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MASTR II mobile conversion question
Mathew Quaife wrote:
I generally don't get involved in online dicussions such as this, but I
At 12/17/2004 01:30 AM, you wrote:
How ever! If you break the rules on GMRS long enough you WELL get to talk to
a field engineer. It is not as loose as Ham radio.
Can anyone really tell, via only over-the-air observations, the difference
between a Part 95 radio a Part 90 radio that's
I guess it may happen when the FCC person does a site inspection:
Santiago Peak - 30+ years ago ...
As the story goes ... The FCC guy put his wattmeter between the
exciter and the final ... then later wanted to write the ham operator
for having more than +/- 5 kHz deviation ...
With the finger printing software out now, yes, by looking at the display
or printed data, the individual radio can be identified. I do not mean that
they can tell the difference between a MICOR and a MASTR. That is easy.
They can identify the specific radio that transmitted. It appears that
: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MASTR II mobile conversion question
At 12/17/2004 01:30 AM, you wrote:
How ever! If you break the rules on GMRS long enough you WELL get to talk
to
a field engineer. It is not as loose as Ham radio.
Can anyone really tell, via only over-the-air observations
, 2004 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MASTR II mobile conversion question
I generally don't get involved in online dicussions such as this, but I
will
have to concur on what Russ said, as I personally called the FCC field
office about this matter about five months ago, and what I
.
- Original Message -
From: Wade Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MASTR II mobile conversion question
One exception might be the Maxtrac radios. Motorola churned out hundreds
of
those
that it was type accepted for GMRS use as well.
Wade - KR7K
- Original Message -
From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MASTR II mobile conversion question
I generally don't get
Let's just hope so. They were quite stern about the equipment issue.
Mathew
Mathew,
Thank you for the rubber stamp on what is going on with GMRS. Maybe some
one
will
stay out of trouble after reading your post.
Very best of 73,
Russ, W3CH
I generally don't get involved in online
Mathew Quaife wrote:
I generally don't get involved in online dicussions such as this, but I will
have to concur on what Russ said, as I personally called the FCC field
office about this matter about five months ago, and what I was told is that
there is no mobile that is acceptable to be
--- Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mathew Quaife wrote:
I generally don't get involved in online
dicussions such as this, but I will
have to concur on what Russ said, as I personally
called the FCC field
office about this matter about five months ago,
and what I was told is that
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Wade Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One exception might be the Maxtrac radios. Motorola churned out
hundreds of
those repeaters built from two Maxtrac radios and a RICK controller.
I am
pretty sure they were using those on
GMRS. also the Motorola
Joe Montierth wrote:
You probably can't get the same right answer from two
or more FCC people that you talk to on the phone. You
are just as likely to get the wrong answer, since you
probably know more about the rules than they do. Just
because it's the FCC on the phone doesn't make it
- Original Message -
From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MASTR II mobile conversion question
Mathew Quaife wrote:
I generally don't get involved in online dicussions
Russ,
It would be a great help to licensed GMRS users if you could post
that list somewhere such as here or Popular Communications GMRS
Forum. This is a hot topic over there too. Or could you email me a
copy of the list?
DougD
WPSI726
KC2KGY
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, russ
There is no list. You have to do a search on each model radio to see
find out which services it is type accepted for.
Johnny
Doug D. wrote:
Russ,
It would be a great help to licensed GMRS users if you could post
that list somewhere such as here or Popular Communications GMRS
Forum.
Johnny,
I am aware about FCC ID search for type acceptance, However Russ
said he had a list thats what I asked for.
Russ, I just noticed this list you have is 600 pages, Hopefully its
in a format such as pdf file copy as it is 600 pages
Thanks,
DougD
WPSI726
KC2KGY
--- In
, December 15, 2004 7:47 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MASTR II mobile conversion question
Johnny,
I am aware about FCC ID search for type acceptance, However Russ
said he had a list thats what I asked for.
Russ, I just noticed this list you have is 600 pages, Hopefully its
in a format
-
From: Doug D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:47 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MASTR II mobile conversion question
Johnny,
I am aware about FCC ID search for type acceptance, However Russ
said he had a list
,
- Original Message -
From: Doug D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:47 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MASTR II mobile conversion question
Johnny,
I am aware about FCC ID search for type acceptance
I generally don't get involved in online dicussions such as this, but I will
have to concur on what Russ said, as I personally called the FCC field
office about this matter about five months ago, and what I was told is that
there is no mobile that is acceptable to be converted as a base repeater.
23 matches
Mail list logo
