in there.
Mine was serial # 445 - Still have several of the left over parts
here. Dave -//- NØATH
- Original Message -
From: kf4vgx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 4:38 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Shorten Tail SQ. on older
of the left over parts
here. Dave -//- NØATH
- Original Message -
From: kf4vgx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 4:38 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Shorten Tail SQ. on older Repeaters
Thanks guys I was looking for an audio
- Original Message -
From: kf4vgx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 8:22 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Shorten Tail SQ. on older Repeaters
Send me those leftovers lol !
Yes I will have to look again i think the variable is set
: kf4vgx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 7:22 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Shorten Tail SQ. on older Repeaters
Send me those leftovers lol !
Yes I will have to look again i think the variable is set as low as
it will go look's like 3
-- OK ill email u in a couple days this one will do 35 watts on a
Byrd. and you right it seems to be a very solid machine and i gotta
say thanks to you and the group for your help .Its Hams like yourself
that brought me to Ham Radio 73 John kf4vgx
contact me at n0ath @ arrl . net about
I think most people that responded thought you actually meant a
squelch tail. Sounds to me like you meant HANG TIME ..something
that a lot of people mix up but are two very different things.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, kf4vgx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I will have to look again
Hang Time is correct and i am guilty :( I'm one of the mixed up
crowd . explain please im new at Repeaters and sure dont mind an
Education .
I think most people that responded thought you actually meant a
squelch tail. Sounds to me like you meant HANG TIME ..something
that a lot of
7 matches
Mail list logo
