Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-11-04 Thread Mark Holman
: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results On Monday 01 November 2004 01:07 pm, Bob Dengler wrote: Cushcraft 4-pole is far from a dummy load. It may be mechanically fragile, but it has about the same gain as any other comparable dipole array. I probably shouldn't have made

RE: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-11-01 Thread Tony lelieveld
Thanks Paul. Tony. * http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/wa6svt.html Paul N1BUG Yahoo! Groups Links --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.742 / Virus Database: 495 - Release Date:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-11-01 Thread Bob Dengler
At 10/30/2004 12:18 PM, you wrote: Unfortunately I don't have much to compare its performance to. The previous antenna was a Cushcraft 4-pole dummy load at the same height. The coaxial collinear provides MUCH better coverage (no surprise there BIG grin). Then your collinear must be very good,

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-11-01 Thread russ
-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:07 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results At 10/30/2004 12:18 PM, you wrote: Unfortunately I don't have much to compare its performance to. The previous antenna was a Cushcraft 4-pole dummy load at the same

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-11-01 Thread Bob Dengler
At 11/1/2004 11:46 AM, you wrote: Here we go with gain again! A reminder that Crunchcraft rates every thing in DBc a made up gain. Not Dbd this is over a EIA 1/2 wave dipole. That statement may be true in regards to some of their other antennas, but is incorrect w.r.t. their omni dipole

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-10-31 Thread Mike WA6ILQ
If Paul is amenable to it, I'll post his email as a web page indexed right under the original article. It will be a One person's results type of article (look at the 6m heliax duplexer article and it's One implementation of the above design) for an example of what I have in mind. And I agree -

RE: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-10-31 Thread Tony lelieveld
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results Hi Mike, Jeff, et al. You can use the email any way you like. I didn't take pictures during construction, but wish I had. I didn't anticipate the interest! I will be starting construction on another

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-10-31 Thread Paul Kelley
On Sunday 31 October 2004 10:59 am, Tony lelieveld wrote: This sounds like a very interesting project. As I somehow missed the start of this thread please let me/us know what the original project plan is and where it came from. http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/wa6svt.html Paul

Re: [Repeater-Builder] WA6SVT coaxial collinear results

2004-10-30 Thread Jeff Otterson
Hey Paul, How about posting some pictures somewhere so we can see your creation? Thanks, Jeff N1KDO At 04:18 PM 10/30/2004, you wrote: Recently when I said I was building one of these, some folks wanted my evaluation of it when it was completed. I've misplaced your emails (I