---Original Message---
From: Ian Wells
Date: 05/07/06 01:58:20
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] cp70-422n
The notch caps have been modified by the tech to suit the 2.5 meg split so I hope it is ok but I hope to be checking with rfs Australia on Monday but I
: 05/07/06 01:43:50
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] cp70-422n
Ian,
The RFS/Celwave CP70-422N duplexer is a good product, but you might contact Celwave regarding the 2.5 MHz split you're using. Some duplexer designs don't necessarily work better
Ian,
The RFS/Celwave CP70-422N
duplexer is a good product, but you might contact Celwave regarding the 2.5 MHz
split you're using. Some duplexer designs don't necessarily work better
with wider splits. The CP70 duplexer is specified for a 600 kHz split, and
its loop settings might not
http://www2.rfsworld.com/RFS_Edition3/pdfs/Duplexers_755-776.pdf
Thank You,
Ian Wells,
Kerinvale Comaudio,
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
---Original Message---
From: Ellen Engle
Date: 05/06/06 22:51:11
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] cp70-422n
Ian,
Interestingly the RF Solutions web site does not list the insertion loss for the CP 70 series duplexers. Looking further thru the pdf I find that the Cp145 series at 144-174 has a 2 dB insertion loss. Even assuming 3dB loss in
Ian,
Interestingly the RF Solutions web site does not
list the insertion loss for the CP 70 series duplexers. Looking further
thru the pdf I find that the Cp145 series at 144-174 has a 2 dB insertion
loss. Even assuming 3dB loss in the cavities you have what appears to be
excessive loss,
6 matches
Mail list logo
