Jed,
The receivers are probable AstroTac receivers. Same as the Quantar, just
packaged a little different.
The receiver is just what you think. A receiver on the same RX frequency.
The unit has a 2 wire and 4 wire output, but only uses the 2 wire for most
applications.
The unit puts out a tone
] On Behalf Of Charles Miller
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 1:12 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers
Jed,
The receivers are probable AstroTac receivers. Same as the Quantar, just
packaged a little different.
The receiver is just what you
Joe,
Did you mean offset when you said stability? I'd agree that 1/2, to a
few Hertz would be annoying. In testing here, and as shown in practice,
simple systems sound better if run at about 10 - 20 Hz offset. This
makes the beating more tolerable without being able to be reproduced
(very
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
transmitters
I have two such systems near me - both on UHF. Come to think of it,
there is one on 800, too. All analog voice simulcast (800 one trunked,
but only two sites). It is definitely annoying to hear the heterodynes
Well, offset results from instability, but yes, offset is a better
choice of wording. You could have perfect stability and still have an
offset.
Yes, the phase would have to be matched, too. 180 degrees off with
perfect stability would not be good. ;-
Joe M.
Kevin Custer wrote:
Joe,
Did
Daron-
Most all your 150 MHz or 900 MHz paging systems are going to be simulcast.
If there are any 150 MHz analog paging systems around, try listening to them.
-- Original Message --
Received: Tue, 03 May 2005 01:26:06 AM CDT
From: Daron Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I would consider one site in favor of a circularly polarized
antenna system. Where that site should be placed is another issue.
If you are thinking of your employeers located city, I know that
one a tiny bit.
Neil - WA6KLA
Daron Wilson wrote:
Hello Folks,
I'm looking over a
Daron,
At last report 152.24 MHz is still used by Arch paging but is
digital. You might contact Arch and ask if any analog paging is
still used in your area.
If you have trouble contacting them, please let me know.
Neil - WA6KLA
JOHN MACKEY wrote:
Daron-
Most all your
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil McKie
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:35 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
transmitters
I would consider one site
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil McKie
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
transmitters
Daron,
At last report
Ken,
Your email program is going wacky
I'd hope it isn't being a responder...
Kevin
Buley, Kenneth L (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote:
ONCE MORE INTO THE BREACH !!
IF YOU'RE READING THIS, YOU PROBABLY DON'T HAVE MUCH TO DO, COMPARED TO THOSE WHO ARE SO BUSY
some used equipment available.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of JOHN MACKEY
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 2:00 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
McKie
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:48 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
transmitters
Daron,
At last report 152.24 MHz is still used by Arch paging but is
digital. You might contact Arch and ask if any analog paging
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast transmitters
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil McKie
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder
]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast transmitters
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil McKie
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
. Then our discussion ends.
-- Original Message --
Received: Tue, 03 May 2005 03:59:50 PM CDT
From: Paul Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast transmitters
John,
What carrier is still letting you get
About once a year they call me tell me that they have a great new paging
service to transfer me to which will be exactly like what I have now only
better. I tell them GREAT, as long as it operates on 150 MHz and provides
voice paging service I'll be happy to change. Then they tell me yes, it
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Finch
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:07 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast transmitters
Daron,
I will tell you what I know about analog simulcast systems
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast transmitters
I guess I wasn't clear enough. I'm familiar with the simulcast paging,
this
is not paging. This is public safety police analog repeaters. The
proposal
is to put three in a row down the town, about 3-4 miles apart
]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast transmitters
I guess I wasn't clear enough. I'm familiar with the simulcast paging,
this
is not paging. This is public safety police analog
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Finch
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:07 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers
with simulcast transmitters
Daron,
I will tell you what I know about analog simulcast
systems
I prefer a big,powerful,high central transmitter with sattelite
receivers. Our city and county uses this type of system and it works
very well over some tough terrain. I was never happy with any simulcast
system,they all have areas of cancellation and fuzzyness. I'd use
trunking before even
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
transmitters
I think the name of the paging company is using this month is Page USA,
they
used to be called MetroCall, before that they were Telepage Northwest, a
Division of McCall Paging, before that they were MCI Airsignal
PROTECTED]
Daron
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Finch
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:07 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast transmitters
Daron,
I
signal. I think it is worth a shot.
tom n8ies
[Original Message]
From: Daron Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: 5/3/2005 8:47:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
transmitters
I guess I wasn't clear enough. I'm familiar
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
transmitters
You will need the three transmitters to have uhso (high stab oscilators) to
keep them within a few hz of each other, you will have to delay the audio
so all three transmitters transmit the audio at the same time. I do
to the voter
Jamey Wright
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Montierth
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:48 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
transmitters
The killer
Yes, you are right!! USA Mobility is the current name.
-- Original Message --
Received: Tue, 03 May 2005 09:11:34 PM CDT
From: Paul Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast transmitters
John, good
Read this article for some more insight, but remember
that it was written by the president of Simulcast
Solutions.
http://www.simulcastsolutions.com/PDF/Simulcast.pdf
Joe
Here is another article written by a ham that has a bit more practical
approach than others I have seen suggested:
ECTED] Behalf Of JOHN MACKEY Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 2:18
PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast transmitters I know that here in Portland 158.700 MHz is STILL occasionally used for Simulcast analog/digital paging. I know th
to.
Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daron
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Finch
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:07 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
/2005 8:47:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] voting receivers with simulcast
transmitters
I guess I wasn't clear enough. I'm familiar with the simulcast paging,
this
is not paging. This is public safety police analog repeaters. The
proposal
is to put three in a row down
32 matches
Mail list logo
