On 2/27/2010 7:54 PM, Fuggitaboutit wrote:
Why cant someone just come up with a 900 meg fm mobile for amateur
use? They would sell a zillion of them .
What would you pay for it?
Nate WY0X
- Original Message -
From: Nate Duehr n...@natetech.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 900 meg Spectra radio
On 2/27/2010 7:54 PM, Fuggitaboutit wrote:
Why cant someone just come up with a 900 meg fm mobile for amateur
use
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 900 meg Spectra radio
On 2/27/2010 7:54 PM, Fuggitaboutit wrote:
Why cant someone just come up with a 900 meg fm mobile for amateur
use? They would sell a zillion of them .
What would you
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Nate Duehr wrote:
That's the reason I asked. There's a major manufacturer making a
pretty decent 1.2 GHz radio (Icom ID-1) that costs $1000, and it's
obviously also (besides doing FM) a D-STAR rig, and that distinction
is making it sell to those with $1000 to burn on a
Yeah, same as 220.
There's not really a need for an amateur rig anyway. There are so many
commercial rigs that go there easily, and you would never be able to buy an
amateur rig with the performance of a Spectra!
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:35 PM, JOHN MACKEY jmac...@usa.net wrote:
Because
True, but where is the hack for the front panel programmable Spectra?
It's nice to not be limited to preprogrammed channels.
Joe M.
James Adkins wrote:
Yeah, same as 220.
There's not really a need for an amateur rig anyway. There are so many
commercial rigs that go there easily, and
I used to be like that, but now that I've gone commercial, I don't find
that's an issue. I would rather have the improved performance. Plus, you
can program in simplex channels, etc. If you can fill up 128 memory
channels on 900 MHz in your area, that's great. Around here, we have 4
repeaters
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 10:21 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject:Re: [Repeater-Builder] 900 meg Spectra radio
I used to be like that, but now that I've gone commercial, I don't find
that's an issue. I would rather have the improved
Not necessarily true, John.
There are pockets of HIGH activity on 900 MHz - especially on the coasts,
where PAVE PAWS has forced the reduction or elimination of 70cm repeaters.
Unfortunately, I'm not on either coast (I'm in the Chicago area) so your
observation is accurate -- for me anyway.
n9...@ameritech.net wrote:
From: Mark n9...@ameritech.net
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 900 meg Spectra radio
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010, 12:47 PM
Not necessarily true, John.
There are pockets of HIGH activity on 900 MHz - especially
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 900 meg Spectra radio
Not necessarily true, John.
There are pockets of HIGH activity on 900 MHz - especially on the coasts,
where PAVE PAWS has forced the reduction or elimination of 70cm repeaters.
Unfortunately, I'm not on either coast (I'm in the Chicago area
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, allan crites wrote:
What really needs to happen is for someone to design a transistor
or FET RF power doubler for all those 450 Mhz radios that will be
coming or now surplus on the commercial market. Then amateur 900 MHz
would boom. Don't ask me to do it, I don't have
: [Repeater-Builder] 900 meg Spectra radio
Not necessarily true, John.
There are pockets of HIGH activity on 900 MHz - especially on the coasts,
where PAVE PAWS has forced the reduction or elimination of 70cm repeaters.
Unfortunately, I'm not on either coast (I'm in the Chicago area) so
Because 900 Mhz is only available to amateurs in the US and not in Japan. The
900 Mhz amateur activity in the US is not very strong.
-- Original Message --
Received: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:02:17 PM PST
From: Fuggitaboutit mikew...@hotmail.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
SNIP
Why
14 matches
Mail list logo
