Thanks for the cursory review Skip. I actually sent via the website a list
of about 6 specific questions about the SCOM 7330 . Have NOT HEARD A THING
back from them which is most encouraging. Perhaps they are going to join
the list of manufacturers who are going to go out of business. They are
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the cursory review Skip. I actually sent via the website a list of
about 6 specific questions about the SCOM 7330 .? Have NOT HEARD A THING back
from them which is most encouraging.? Perhaps they are going to join the list
of manufacturers who are going to go out of
Hi All, I have inherited a 4031 but it doesn't have the mod B gen
option fitted. Has anyone got a spare module or a blown up 4031 with
the module in please?
I appreciate you can use the Ext Mod input but it's becoming a bit of a
pain in the grass!
Any help appreciated and any expences
I have a commercial application to monitor the battery status and charge
current at a solar site and asked for information on controllers that would
allow me to monitor these parameters by requesting a voice readback. I was
immediately answered by Ken Arch (sp?) and another RC-210 owner with
Hey
My first controller consisted of a transistor and resistor connected to
one of the terminals on the squelch
pot of a old crystal Regency radio for RX to TX PPT signal. I had a cap
between the audio out of the
RX radio to the mike input of the TX radio.
Hey, it worked...
It didn't have a
Hi Mike,
Myself a Kenwood Dealer and Electronics - Service/Repair Station
for all brands I can tell you it's really hard to be immediately
accessible 24/7. More than once I've been guilty of dropping the
ball about responding to all the things I need to do, which is
something I/we try hard
At 8/5/2008 23:01, you wrote:
Thanks for the cursory review Skip. I actually sent via the website a list
of about 6 specific questions about the SCOM 7330 . Have NOT HEARD A
THING back from them which is most encouraging. Perhaps they are going to
join the list of manufacturers who are going
Hi Jim,
I have a commercial application to monitor the battery status and charge
current at a solar site and asked for information on controllers that would
allow me to monitor these parameters by requesting a voice readback.? I was
immediately answered by Ken Arch (sp?) and another RC-210
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
My first controller consisted of a transistor and resistor
connected to one of the terminals on the squelch pot of a
old crystal Regency radio for RX to TX PPT signal. I had
a cap between the audio out of the RX radio to the mike input
of the TX
At 08:28 AM 8/6/2008, Jim Brown wrote:
I have a commercial application to monitor the battery status and
charge current at a solar site and asked for information on
controllers that would allow me to monitor these parameters by
requesting a voice readback. I was immediately answered by Ken
My first repeater back in 1996 or so was a Motorola Research Line all
tube 'coffin' eqquiped with a 'Sensicon G' receiver with ovened
crystals in both transmit and receive strips. Controlling that was a
CES Repeater Maker RM-10 with a custom built Voice IDer based on the
Radio Shack carried
I've had great success with the RC210 A/D. Of course I hate LM335s,
but that's not Arcom's fault. My experience with SCOM would tell me
that when their support is included, it will be bulletproof.
On Aug 6, 2008, at 11:29 AM, Ken Arck wrote:
At 08:28 AM 8/6/2008, Jim Brown wrote:
I have a
I have a TKR 830 UHF Kenwood Repeater Excellent shape.
This is the model before the TKR 840 factory says it has the same
same specifications as the TKR840 except does not do NRZ paging
and the inputs/outputs are fixed.
$750.00 shipped to your door (lower 48 only) elsewhere email for
I have some mobile diplexers 400mhz and 470mhz
also 20x Plessey MTR 8000 and manuals
I worked at Sydney Tower radio room for 16 years and have collected a
lot of equipment( a garage full, you all know what i mean)
Is there any where to post this and more equipment. I prefer it goes
to active
I have come across a set of combiner filters for 863mhz. These are
Sinclair C4337-1RWB units.
There are three bandpass and two notch cavities per set. In other
words, 5 cavities for tx and
five for receive. The cavities are 12X6.5 inches. they appear to be
3/4wave at 863mhz.(or so)
Not sure
Ken, my problem is that when a company sells me something that turns out to be
totally useless and then fails to offer any solution or compensation, it is
hard for me to have any confidence in their products.
I attempted to join the RC-110 Yahoo group twice and both times I was refused
entry
Let's take this offlist. Perhaps we can work something out that is
workable for us both (for example, might you be interested in us
taking the 110 back in partial trade?)
Ken
At 01:04 PM 8/6/2008, Jim Brown wrote:
Ken, my problem is that when a company sells me something that turns
out to
I'd be intrested in looking at the once open source code for the
RC-110 and earlier versions of the RC-210 before the decision was made
to close it.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's take this offlist. Perhaps we can work something out that is workable
for
Ken, my problem is that when a company sells me something that turns out to
be totally useless and then fails to offer any solution or compensation,
it is hard for me to have any confidence in their products.
Talk this way to Intel, Nvidia, AMD, ATI or any PC manufacturer? :o)
Greetz
Thanks for the reply. I know they are interchangable but I need the
2.5. for GMRS. Anyone have one kxn-1029? Thanks
Craig
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Captainlance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both elements are interchangeable, only the stability is different,
2.5 parts vs. 5 PPM
We are considering replacing a damaged antenna on a 440 machine. Anyone
have any comments on using a Hustler G6. The antenna will be exposed to
normal weather conditions for the northeast.( wind ice...etc..)
Jim
From the few reports I have heard, the G6 for the 440mhz band is a loser.
Joe
jimmyrtle wrote:
We are considering replacing a damaged antenna on a 440 machine. Anyone
have any comments on using a Hustler G6. The antenna will be exposed to
normal weather conditions for the northeast.( wind
Kick it up a notch, and move up to the Hustler Spirit. You'll be
glad you did.
Shorty, K6JSI
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the few reports I have heard, the G6 for the 440mhz band is
a loser.
Joe
jimmyrtle wrote:
We are considering
One of the groups I was with used a G6-270R for a few years. It seemed
to work about as well as a similar sized (but a LOT thicker)
commercial antenna that we'd also used. Feedline was the same and they
were both about the same height on top of a building. I know there
have been a lot of
Joe,
Have used the G440 on my Repeater iin Ohio. Works very well, except when
it ices up, then SWR range goes Down.
Wesley AB8KD
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Joe wrote:
From the few reports I have heard, the G6 for the 440mhz band is a
loser.
Joe
jimmyrtle wrote:
We are
One last comment Ken, and I won't pester you any more. If a partial trade
would be for an RC-210, I am afraid I am not interested. I got the RC-110 that
I have from a friend who was anxious to get a repeater on the air and rather
than mess with the RC-110, which was not working, he bought an
Ok Jim.
I have to say I find that hard to believe as every single 210 that is
purchased assembled tested is tested on all 3 Ports for proper
operations. If lands were missing, it would have never left here.
Unless your friend purchased a kit in which case we have no control
over its
I would like to find some info on this 7330 -
is there a web site with it or do you have a
direct email addy Ken?
NØATH
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Ken Arck
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]SCOM 7330
As a Ham Radio Antenna it's not bad... but you should know it
doesn't cover the entire 440 to 450 10 MHz. So if your box it
near the band edge the antenna match and return loss are not
great (actually can be pretty bad).
Other guys have mentioned the commercial line-up/models and they
are
Hi Dave,
The 7330 is an S-COM product. The website is www.scomcontrollers.com.
73,
Bob, WA9FBO
-Original Message-
From: N0ATH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 4:36 pm
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]SCOM 7330 Question
I would like to
Jim,
Not a lot of experience with the G-6 except for one site. It did work
OK, but we did replace it with a X-50NA this year, and it seemed to
gain a little more coverage. We have had excellent results here in the
NorthWest with the Diamond X-50NA antenna's. We have them on some
pretty rugged
Anyone know the correct part number and a source for the FET's that
Telelwave uses in their TWR series of multicouplers for 150 and 450?
Thanks,
Joe - WA7JAW
At 04:13 PM 8/6/2008, Joe Burkleo wrote:
Anyone know the correct part number and a source for the FET's that
Telelwave uses in their TWR series of multicouplers for 150 and 450?
---As a Telewave Dealer, I'll check for you tomorrow, Joe
Ken
Ken,
Thanks a lot.
I will give you a call when I get a chance.
Joe - WA7JAW
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:13 PM 8/6/2008, Joe Burkleo wrote:
Anyone know the correct part number and a source for the FET's that
Telelwave uses in their TWR
Jim,
About five years ago, I installed a Hustler G6-450-2 antenna at a commercial
site. This is identical to the G6-440 antenna in construction, but is for
the 456-464 MHz band. I had to replace it after only three years in service
because water had leaked into the base and caused significant
__ NOD32 (20080806) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
At 8/6/2008 15:02, you wrote:
Joe,
Have used the G440 on my Repeater iin Ohio. Works very well, except when
it ices up, then SWR range goes Down.
Wesley AB8KD
Same experience here. Not that much ice where my repeaters are, so that's
never been a major problem for me. Mine is probably 20
I have had probably 15 or 20 of them in service for many years, and
they work great. Go here... http://www.new-
tronics.com/main/html/base_spirit_model_430-450_mhz.html for more
info.
Like I said, try one, you'll be glad you did.
Shorty, K6JSI
Michael Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
I would be interested in that info also! I have a VHF unit down right now.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Burkleo
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 6:13 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
At 8/6/2008 15:40, you wrote:
As a Ham Radio Antenna it's not bad... but you should know it
doesn't cover the entire 440 to 450 10 MHz. So if your box it
near the band edge the antenna match and return loss are not
great (actually can be pretty bad).
I never had that problem with mine @ ~445.5
I'm also a Telewave Dealer...
The answer depends on the generation/age and specific
model of your Telewave Multi-coupler. Some have/had bipolar
transistors, some had special what I call quasi low noise
FET type devices and I believe some of the newer Telewave
Preamps should now be using
Skipp and Ken,
Thanks for the info.
The unit that is in need of a new device is a TWR8-150. Not sure of
the vintage. It is most likely at least 5 years old.
Thanks,
Joe
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also a Telewave Dealer...
The answer
Several months ago someone on this board contacted me
when I needed one of these changed to a different
frequency.
I've misplaced the email address and if that party sees
this, I'd appreciate contact so we can get in touch. I
have another one needing programming.
Thanks 73
I will be giving a talk at DEFCON 16 this weekend in Las Vegas at the
Rivera Hotel and Casino.
http://www.defcon.org/html/defcon-16/dc-16-speakers.html#Krick
There are also other Amateur Radio topics on the agenda, as well as a
Wireless Villiage.
44 matches
Mail list logo
