[Repeater-Builder] Silver plating of cavities advice please?

2010-07-11 Thread Dave
Hi All, I have rescently obtained a uhf pair of cavities that are not silver 
plated inside (bare copper) They both have an insertion loss of 3dBIf I 
were to get them silver plated what would the improvement be?

I have no idea how much it would cost but if the saving was only about 0.5dB I 
wouldn't bother.

Your thoughts please?

Cheers Dave UZN




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Silver plating of cavities advice please?

2010-07-11 Thread skipp025


 Dave dave_g7...@... wrote:
 Hi All, I have rescently obtained a uhf pair of cavities 
 that are not silver plated inside (bare copper) They both 
 have an insertion loss of 3dB 

In this example the 3dB insertion loss is not is not 
affected (to any significant value) by the lack of silver 
plating.  

 If I were to get them silver plated what would the 
 improvement be?

The person/business you pay to complete the plating has an 
improved income. 

 I have no idea how much it would cost but if the saving 
 was only about 0.5dB I wouldn't bother.

Don't bother... 

 Your thoughts please?

I try not to have any... 

 Cheers Dave UZN

Never watched the show and I believe it was on the UPN out here. 
:-) 

On a more serious note... you might look around for pictures 
and descriptions of the very famous Motorola T-1500 series of 
cavities often made into various combination of duplexer 
assemblies. They are not plated and they work very well. The 
insertion loss is set by the probe type and position. 

s. 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Silver plating of cavities advice please?

2010-07-11 Thread Doug Hutchison
Skipp,

Did you ever work with Rowan and Martin?!! Very good as usual.

Doug

On 11/07/2010 14:21:32, skipp025 (skipp...@yahoo.com) wrote:
   Dave dave_g7...@... wrote:
   Hi All, I have rescently obtained a uhf pair of cavities
   that are not silver plated inside (bare copper) They both
   have an insertion loss of 3dB
 
  In this example the 3dB insertion loss is not is not
  affected (to any significant value) by the lack of silver
  plating.
 
   If I were to get them silver plated what would the
   improvement be?
 
  The person/business you pay to complete the plating has an
  improved income.
 
   I have no idea how much it would cost but if the saving
   was only about 0.5dB I wouldn't bother.
 
  Don't bother...
 
   Your thoughts please?
 
  I try not to have any...
 
   Cheers Dave UZN
 
  Never watched the show and I believe it was on the UPN out here.
  :-)
 
  On a more serious note... you might look around for pictures
  and descriptions of the very famous Motorola T-1500 series of
  cavities often made into various combination of duplexer
  assemblies. They are not plated and they work very well. The
  insertion loss is set by the probe type and position.
 
  s.
 
 
 
 
   %0


[Repeater-Builder] Re: Silver plating of cavities advice please?

2010-07-11 Thread Dave
Thanks for that SkippI accept your opinions but in that case why do some 
manufactures silver plate the insides and some don't?

Cheers Dave UZN


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, skipp025 skipp...@... wrote:

 
 
  Dave dave_g7uzn@ wrote:
  Hi All, I have rescently obtained a uhf pair of cavities 
  that are not silver plated inside (bare copper) They both 
  have an insertion loss of 3dB 
 
 In this example the 3dB insertion loss is not is not 
 affected (to any significant value) by the lack of silver 
 plating.  
 
  If I were to get them silver plated what would the 
  improvement be?
 
 The person/business you pay to complete the plating has an 
 improved income. 
 
  I have no idea how much it would cost but if the saving 
  was only about 0.5dB I wouldn't bother.
 
 Don't bother... 
 
  Your thoughts please?
 
 I try not to have any... 
 
  Cheers Dave UZN
 
 Never watched the show and I believe it was on the UPN out here. 
 :-) 
 
 On a more serious note... you might look around for pictures 
 and descriptions of the very famous Motorola T-1500 series of 
 cavities often made into various combination of duplexer 
 assemblies. They are not plated and they work very well. The 
 insertion loss is set by the probe type and position. 
 
 s.





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Silver plating of cavities advice please?

2010-07-11 Thread kb9mwr
I can't speak for the manufactures, but I think silver plating them would cut 
down on the chance of the cavities oxidizing over time.

So that is why I would have them plated.



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Silver plating of cavities advice please?

2010-07-11 Thread Oz-in-DFW
Silver plating can have an impressive positive performance effect under
some circumstances.  It's also at advantage because it's corrosion
result is conductive, so performance is not effected by tarnishing.

-- 
mailto:o...@ozindfw.net
Oz
POB 93167 
Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport) 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Silver plating of cavities advice please?

2010-07-11 Thread Oz-in-DFW


On 7/11/2010 11:46 AM, Oz-in-DFW wrote:
  

 Silver plating can have an impressive positive performance effect under
 some circumstances. It's also at advantage because it's corrosion
 result is conductive, so performance is not effected by tarnishing.

 -- 
 mailto:o...@ozindfw.net mailto:oz%40ozindfw.net
 Oz
 POB 93167
 Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport)

 _
Hit the *(^$% send button too fast.

If the manufacturer didn't bother to plate them, I wouldn't either.

-- 
mailto:o...@ozindfw.net
Oz
POB 93167 
Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport) 






[Repeater-Builder] UHF Isolater needed

2010-07-11 Thread K5IN
Good morning,


Like the header says, UHF isolator needed for 440.500 any suggestions?


Thanks


Brian, k5in


[Repeater-Builder] Re: Silver plating of cavities advice please?

2010-07-11 Thread skipp025


 Dave dave_g7...@... wrote:
 Thanks for that SkippI accept your opinions but 
 in that case why do some manufactures silver plate the 
 insides and some don't?
 Cheers Dave UZN

Hi Dave, 
Please don't accept my opinions as gospel, always try to 
obtain information from multiple sources following up on 
the stated facts for accuracy. 

There are two major reasons considered by many people for 
silver plating coil and cavity surfaces. Q and Oxidation 
Let's talk about both in reverse order... 

   [pasted text from another reply post]
 I can't speak for the manufactures, but I think silver 
 plating them would cut down on the chance of the cavities 
 oxidizing over time.

Silver does oxidize, just less/slower than bare copper. The 
environment becomes the relative pivot point in your choice 
to plate or nay. I have 1970's vintage bare copper cavities 
in clean, cool, dry locations that still look shinny/new. Many 
of the internally not silver plated Motorola T-1500 Duplexers 
are real-world examples still in active service.

Q is everything if you really need it... but in this example 
you only need enough Q to get the job done. And in the cavities 
we're talking about here you should be able to obtain enough 
Q for the job. 

One of the rare examples I've really seen the obvious benefits 
of Silver Plating is in the field of NMR Probe Design  
Construction. A way off topic application for this group... but 
proof to me there is real merit to silver plating if you need 
it. In many examples for UHF/VHF Amateur Duplexer applications 
I'd say silver plating is not an in-stone requirement. Just 
beneficial if you do... 

cheers, 
s.

   Dave dave_g7uzn@ wrote:
   Hi All, I have rescently obtained a uhf pair of cavities 
   that are not silver plated inside (bare copper) They both 
   have an insertion loss of 3dB 
  
  In this example the 3dB insertion loss is not is not 
  affected (to any significant value) by the lack of silver 
  plating.  
  
   If I were to get them silver plated what would the 
   improvement be?
  
  The person/business you pay to complete the plating has an 
  improved income. 
  
   I have no idea how much it would cost but if the saving 
   was only about 0.5dB I wouldn't bother.
  
  Don't bother... 
  
   Your thoughts please?
  
  I try not to have any... 
  
   Cheers Dave UZN
  
  Never watched the show and I believe it was on the UPN out here. 
  :-) 
  
  On a more serious note... you might look around for pictures 
  and descriptions of the very famous Motorola T-1500 series of 
  cavities often made into various combination of duplexer 
  assemblies. They are not plated and they work very well. The 
  insertion loss is set by the probe type and position. 
  
  s.
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Silver plating of cavities advice please?

2010-07-11 Thread skipp025



 Skipp,
 Did you ever work with Rowan and Martin?!! 
 Doug

Hi Doug, 

One must always keep a real sense of humor to keep from 
otherwise screaming at the lunatics I/we have to deal with 
on a daily basis. 

The key is to avoid giving the real lunatics your 
home or cell phone number. 

:-) 

s. 

PS: I do enjoy listening to Ernestine the Telephone Operator 
skits on the XM Satellite Radio Comedy Channels. Though just 
a coincidence...  I think. 




[Repeater-Builder] UHF Repeater Amps For Sale

2010-07-11 Thread wb2bxl
I have two UHF repeater Amps for sale  1. TPL PA6-1BE 8 - 20 watts in 70 - 100 
watts out, continuous duty.  $ 275 includes shipping.
2. GE MASTR II PL19D424895G32 1/2 watt in 110 watts out $ 250, not sure, but I 
think this is cont. duty, has a real big heatsink. includes shipping. Both work 
in ham band.  Bob W2XL 845-417-1894 or e-mail



Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Repeater Amps For Sale

2010-07-11 Thread Eddie Cope
Could you shoot me a photo of the  TPL PA6-1BE ?


 _
Eddie Cope wb5hhz





 

--- On Sun, 7/11/10, wb2bxl w...@hvc.rr.com wrote:


From: wb2bxl w...@hvc.rr.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Repeater Amps For Sale
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, July 11, 2010, 2:34 PM


  



I have two UHF repeater Amps for sale 1. TPL PA6-1BE 8 - 20 watts in 70 - 100 
watts out, continuous duty. $ 275 includes shipping.
2. GE MASTR II PL19D424895G32 1/2 watt in 110 watts out $ 250, not sure, but I 
think this is cont. duty, has a real big heatsink. includes shipping. Both work 
in ham band. Bob W2XL 845-417-1894 or e-mail








Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Repeater Amps For Sale

2010-07-11 Thread Bon Hal
I'd also be interested in a photo.  Thanks.

Hal Brueseke
KA9MXW
  - Original Message - 
  From: Eddie Cope 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 5:42 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Repeater Amps For Sale



Could you shoot me a photo of the  TPL PA6-1BE ?


 _
Eddie Cope wb5hhz





--- On Sun, 7/11/10, wb2bxl w...@hvc.rr.com wrote:


  From: wb2bxl w...@hvc.rr.com
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Repeater Amps For Sale
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Sunday, July 11, 2010, 2:34 PM



  I have two UHF repeater Amps for sale 1. TPL PA6-1BE 8 - 20 watts in 
70 - 100 watts out, continuous duty. $ 275 includes shipping.
  2. GE MASTR II PL19D424895G32 1/2 watt in 110 watts out $ 250, not 
sure, but I think this is cont. duty, has a real big heatsink. includes 
shipping. Both work in ham band. Bob W2XL 845-417-1894 or e-mail

   


  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Phoenix S model

2010-07-11 Thread n5sxq.0
I have 1 GE Phoenix psx200 that I would part with. I would like to trade for 1 
Motorola RADIUS (NOT MAXTRAC) UHF  2 ch 25 watt radio. 
Jeff n5sxq
n5sx...@charter.net
 dwmcg...@bellsouth.net dwmcg...@bellsouth.net wrote: 
 Anybody have any VHF or UHF Phoesnix  S models they are willing to get rid 
 of---sell or swap. Wanting the narrowband version and the 2 channel will be 
 okay.
 
 Reply to dwmcg...@bellsouth.net
 
 Thanks, Dale K0JXI
 



[Repeater-Builder] Re-tuning MSR-2000 Channel Elements.

2010-07-11 Thread Path_Finder.Geo
Hi everyone, I am going to post this message here because batlabs didn't 
approve my post.  Apparently it's too harsh to tell people, PLEASE DO NOT TELL 
ME TO HAVE SOMEONE ELSE DO IT.

I am looking for information on how exactly to re-tune a channel element for a 
MSR repeater.  I've seen instructions as far as what to adjust on the element 
itself, but what I really need to know is; what equipment is required, how to 
hook that equipment up to the channel element, and what to look for while 
adjusting the channel element.

Now I realize that I need a new crystal as well, and I realize it can all be 
done professionally with temperature compensation.  But what I want to know is 
how I can do it myself just to get started and make sure everything is going to 
work the way I want before I pay out big bucks to have it all done the right 
way.  I have an extra set of channel elements, so playing around with one set 
isn't going to affect having the other set done professionally if I mess 
something up.

Thanks for any help you can give me,
Jeff - KB1SPH / WQEX694



[Repeater-Builder] Recrystal MSR-2000 Channel Elements (and a guacamole recipe)

2010-07-11 Thread skipp025


Recrystal MSR-2000 Channel Elements 

 Path_Finder.Geo kb1...@... wrote:
 Hi everyone, I am going to post this message here because 
 batlabs didn't approve my post. Apparently it's too harsh 
 to tell people, PLEASE DO NOT TELL ME TO HAVE SOMEONE 
 ELSE DO IT.

Hi Jeff, 
Apparently you do not play the BatLabs Game very well? I'm 
sure you'll survive with the ever so perky bunch over here. 

 I am looking for information on how exactly to re-tune 
 a channel element for a MSR repeater.  I've seen 
 instructions as far as what to adjust on the element 
 itself, but what I really need to know is; what equipment 
 is required, how to hook that equipment up to the channel 
 element, and what to look for while adjusting the channel 
 element.

The transmit channel element is best adjusted for frequency 
center by using a Communications Service Monitor setup to 
sample (off the on-air signal) read the main carrier 
channel/frequency.  The simple way to set the IDC Control/Pot 
is to set the Transmit CTCSS (PL) Tone deviation to about 750Hz. 
In a stock MSR-2000 the repeat audio level is then set using 
the level pot on the Squelch Gate Module. 

If you don't have access to a Service Monitor, a decent Frequency 
Counter will at least let you net (adjust) the frequency to 
F-center (on the desired frequency). 

If you move the transmitter more than say... 500 kHz from its 
last alignment location, you should repeat the Service Manual 
Alignment steps on or near the new frequency. 

The Receiver is a different animal. Take the Receiver frequency 
and add and/or subtract the receiver IF frequency (most often 
10.7 or 10.8 MHz for the VHF Receiver).  The formula you use 
depends on your receivers IF Frequency and Injection Chain, 
which translates to which side of the IF the multiplied crystal 
frequency ends up on.  In your example it's probably F-frequency 
minus the IF Frequency equals the multiplied Channel Element 
injection frequency, which is what you want to set/align. 

Put a X1 Scope/Text Probe on your Service Monitor (or Frequency 
Counter) Antenna (Low Level RF) Input and place it down onto/near 
the receiver circuit board. You can also use a decent quality 
frequency counter if you're more careful. At some location on 
or near the board you will be able to monitor and measure the 
output of the RX Channel Element Frequency, then set it for the 
expected Injection Frequency. 

As an example: A receive frequency of 151.625 MHz minus a 10.7 
IF frequency equals 140.925 MHz. Sniff around the receiver 
board until you observe a signal in that area, then net 
(adjust) the channel element frequency to the expected 140.925 
F-center location. If you can't find the expected frequency 
you might run the numbers for a 10.8 IF Frequency and sniff 
around 140.825 for the channel element injection frequency. 

In both the above examples, a X1 (times-1) Scope Probe or something 
similar is handy to use. If you can't get/find a signal, make a 
short antenna probe by clipping a small length of insulated 
regular wire onto the end of the probe. The end of the wire held 
by the Scope Probe jaws should obviously be stripped bare. 
Try not to allow the sampling wire and/or probe to directly 
contact/short any of the exposed metal parts on the receiver 
board. 

 Now I realize that I need a new crystal as well, and I 
 realize it can all be done professionally with temperature 
 compensation. 

Yeah but in many cases professional is a lot more expensive 
than it really has to be. 

 But what I want to know is how I can do it myself just 
 to get started and make sure everything is going to work 
 the way I want before I pay out big bucks to have it all 
 done the right way.  I have an extra set of channel 
 elements, so playing around with one set isn't going to 
 affect having the other set done professionally if I 
 mess something up.

For me there are two regular places to order crystals. The 
first is International Crystal Manufacturing, always high 
quality but you will find the pricing a bit steep for any 
casual crystal/channel element work. 

The second location for me is Bomar, where I pretty much 
buy all my channel element crystals. Their quality, pricing 
and wait time is in my opinion more than fair. Their only 
down side (to me) is their $50 min order amount. So you might 
need to order a few extra crystals to make an order amount. 
Not a problem if you think ahead or pal-up with someone else 
to place an order. 

I call Bomar with a Visa Card in the other hand, tell them I 
want Crystals for Mitrek/MSR-2000 Channel Elements KXN-1086 
and KXN-1088 types. There are other MSR Channel Element numbers 
you can use, but the above model numbers are the most popular 
and should be interchangeable with anything you might have. 
At a price of about $15/$20 per crystal (last time I had some 
cut) I order at least 4 crystals to make the min order amount. 

Wait the normal time (they do have rush service for more $$) 

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Silver plating of cavities advice please?

2010-07-11 Thread Barry

Silver plate does help in the long run
if you travel miles twice a year to clean + polish then plating wil reduce/stop 
tarnish and might help Q , as for insertion lose improvements sometimes 
  
_
Browse profiles for FREE! Meet local singles online.
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/