I have a new Bell 4800 controller for sale - - - top
quality unit with all features - - - $100.
Ron, in LODI -
===
--- Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a DRC-186 Repeater Controller that is in need
> of some chips on
> the AD
JOE:I am toying around with the repeater-maker "SR4-D". I have this equipment now for more than 15 years. Is sleeps and can be awaken by certain command... csiJoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I guess my question would be: Why pick this means of control when there are so many other better w
On Dec 1, 2005, at 12:18 AM, Eric Lemmon wrote:
> I don't think you need to employ a simplex repeater in this case.
> They are
> great for allowing users to hear how they sound to others, but they
> quickly
> become annoying to use. In some emergency situations, I can see a
> simplex
> rep
Paul,
My comment applied generally to VHF duplexers, which can be detuned by rough
handing. At UHF, you can use a "mobile" duplexer, which is far more
rugged. I was not thinking about GMRS being your intended application.
I don't think you need to employ a simplex repeater in this case. They a
At 03:49 AM 12/1/2005 -, you wrote:
>I am looking for any of the older VHF Engineering boards or repeaters.
<---Why?
Ken
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an emai
I am looking for any of the older VHF Engineering boards or repeaters.
The company went out of buisness in the 70's I believe. I have a
TX-144 which I purchased new from them while they were still in buisness.
TNX Mark / WA4MN
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go
On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:08 PM, Eric Lemmon wrote:
> Bear in mind that when a duplexer leaves the factory with precisely-
> set
> tuning and insertion loss, it may suffer considerable vibration during
> shipment. That's why I always check duplexers and bandpass
> cavities on a
> network analyzer
Tim,
If your email account will let you accept pic attachments, I can send pics
that show the procedure I used.
I used a Pace vacuum de-soldering station to remove the eprom. I then
put in a low profile socket and removed the headers used to connect the module
to the main board. I p
Hello, Tim here W3PLC
I am looking for way to program the Syntech 1 units I have on for a fire
company to do also one to put on 6-meters for myself. All I need is the
eprom info.
I have all the state of art test equipment here in my shop so the tuning is
the easy part. I just don't ha
Great rigs.
They are Syntech 1 units, and I have had receive sensitivity of .3uV nearly
full quieting on injected signal on 52.525 MHz. They are simple to align
using a signal generator and a DC Voltmeter.
With the Syntech II equivalent, 0520CWB sensitivity of only 3uV after taking
the advice
Hi Mike,
>> The 6K and 7K have been discontinued, but the feature will be
kept in >> the new 7330 controller.>> It's been a while
since I looked, how's the timeframe coming for the > release of the 7330
Bob?
Our new slogan: Dayton or bust!
73,
Bob, WA9FBO
Mathew,
Actually, if the duplexer insertion loss is really 2.2 dB, you should get
120.5 watts out for 200 watts in. Once you consider the small additional
loss in jumpers, connectors, adapters, etc., you're not too far off the
mark. The tolerance and linearity of your power measuring instrument
I agree, but at this point, I am only getting 100 watts out of the duplexers instead of the 137 watts I would like to see. Now you mention something that I might now be aware of, and that is the interaction between the rx side and the tx side, could that have an effect on the power out, however
Mathew,
I think you will find that the RF at high power is probable correct. The
difference you see between low power and high is about 17dB. Unless you are
measuring the low power down to 0.01 watts it will be difficult to find the
real loss. Provided all is working correctly the RF power levels
Ok, running the TX-RX duplexer, with a 2.2 dB insertion loss, I tuned
the duplexers on the monitor. All three of them looked identical,
with rejection on the rx side of -80 dBm on each single cavity. Once
I tied them all together, the rx rejection was better then -10 dBm,
all went well there.
Hmmm, I still have my genuine Motorola tuning tool set, complete with
official geeky pocket protector! It even has the huge fiber tool for those
old GGV's!
Doesn't Batwing offer tools anymore or are they just too pricey for what
they are?
Ken
--
Steve,
The only place that comes to mind is Motorola Parts. The MICOR Universal
Tuning Tool, just like the one that came with the radio, is part number
6684387C01, and it currently costs $ 5.30
73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
Ronnie & Steve Rice wrote:
> Hi, Can someone tell me where the best place is
well here in Florida (Tampa
Bay area) all the stores in the malls don't sell parts anymore, only
stores with parts are the ones in strip centers. There thought is no one
comes to the mall for parts and I would bet it is also the cost of rents on the
malls. They need a faster turn over
I guess my question would be: Why pick this means of control when there are
so many other better ways?
>chris_inos wrote:
> >
> > can one remotely activate a repeater without tones?
> > Say: click PTT three times within 3 seconds and repeater is up.
> >click PTT four times within 3 sec
FYI
The Midland 70-050 70-052 70-055 70-056 Radios work great on 6
meters..
Just make sure you get the "C" split
80 channels of pure fun
73 Scott ka9sln
Fort Wayne In
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*>
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Paul Yonge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2005, at 3:28 PM, msdanehart wrote:
>
> > Does anybody have any information about the Midland vehicular
> > lowband/uhf crossband repeat trunk systems that were employed a
few
> > years back?
> >
> >
The option is 70-2959-x (where x is either a 1 for VHF (High Band) or 2 for
UHF).
This option was available in the 70-0500 series, which could include a
number of model numbers that indicate the mounting system, control head
feature level, output power, etc. All 0500 series are Lowband.
I hav
On Nov 30, 2005, at 3:28 PM, msdanehart wrote:
> Does anybody have any information about the Midland vehicular
> lowband/uhf crossband repeat trunk systems that were employed a few
> years back?
>
> I believe the model numbers were soemthing like 70-0500CWB **?
I inquired about a UHF repeat
"Bob M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:While I hate to utter these words, you might find aset at a well-equipped RadioShack store. I resent them words, please let my Radioshack die in peace, hi hi, just kidding. Actually Radioshack quit carrying the tuning tools quite some time ago, all the
Does anybody have any information about the Midland vehicular
lowband/uhf crossband repeat trunk systems that were employed a few
years back?
I believe the model numbers were soemthing like 70-0500CWB **?
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://g
I have no clue about these combination numbers... I have a
B3D100YAUDA. Supposed to be a LB repeater. Thanks
Will
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The 6K and 7K have been discontinued, but the feature will be kept in
> the new 7330 controller.
It's been a while since I looked, how's the timeframe coming for the
release of the 7330 Bob? Mike KA4MKG
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web,
I have a DRC-186 Repeater Controller that is in need of some chips on
the AD Technologies controller board. I have two programmed parts that
bit the dust and trying to find if someone can help or know someone to
repair this old technology? This is for a Club that I belong to in my
area. I was seein
well for crystals we use Bomar
tools Tesco has a set they sell that has about 4 to 6 in a setthey
always have worked for us.
- Original Message -
From: "Ronnie & Steve Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 8:26 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Tunin
While I hate to utter these words, you might find a
set at a well-equipped RadioShack store.
There are several common sizes of hex tuning tools.
One such official one has two hex sizes at one end and
a flat blade piece of metal at the other end that will
fit the slot in the power control pot.
0.0
Hi, Can someone tell me where the best place is to find tuning tools
for the Motorola Micors coils? I am not sure of the size of the hex in
the receiver except none of mine fit(too small) Wanted to order some
new ones but wanted to be sure to get the right size or sizes. Oh and
the gentleman th
Hello Group
Once again we are searching for these sub's
UHF Micor repeater:
75-100 W Continous duty PA - Need 2
IPA Assemblies - Need 3
Pls RSVP w/ price & condx
Ed Folta
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
To un
people from avionics are quick to come to the rescue for someone looking for help..and not spend times with "Unpallatable Dry Jokes" Chris Honolulu, HawaiiChris: Lucky you. :-)Joe M. Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a spare UHF repeater and duplexer for the project and he has
a 65
> foot tower on the property, so putting a repeater on the air would
not be
> difficult. His wife could then use an HT around the house to keep in
I have used this same model. it will do just
fine. I stuck a fan out of an old PC power supply on the heat sink and has been
fine for years.
Kevin King SCSA BSCIS
ARS KC6OVD
GMRS KAG0378
EIEIO 2722
Acworth Georgia
-Original Message-From:
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[m
35 matches
Mail list logo
