Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kenwood TKR-750 (VHF repeater)

2010-08-30 Thread Jeff Ackerman
IF you have a ver 2, you can do a mod detailed in the service manual by
switching the position of some cap's to make it work on one port without a
antenna relay.

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ken Arck ah...@ah6le.net wrote:



 At 01:47 PM 8/28/2010, Juan Tellez wrote:
 
 
 For simplex use, you have to have an external antenna relay.
 
 

 -Yup. You need an external relay. Checkout RF Parts as they have
 fairly reasonably priced ones

 Ken
 --
 President and CTO - Arcom Communications
 Makers of repeater controllers and accessories.
 http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
 Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
 we offer complete repeater packages!
 AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
 http://www.irlp.net
 We don't just make 'em. We use 'em!

  




-- 
Jeff Ackerman
Peninsula Communications
6 Rossi Circle, Suite C
Salinas, Ca 93907
j...@peninsulacom.com


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Erring on the Side of Caution....

2010-07-01 Thread Jeff Ackerman
That site has been around for along time, it used to be under another domain
*www.ham.dmz.ro*, which now points to that new domain.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:44 PM, La Rue Communications
laruec...@gmail.comwrote:



 Ran across this website

 http://www.hampedia.net/motorola/mt-1000.php

 Found out it has the RSS to the Motorola MT1000. And me being the cautious
 guy to never get into legal crap with the big boys as I know how Motorola's
 Software License Agreement is big and scary..

 Is this site legitimate or is this site just asking for trouble by posting
 RSS for the general public?

 Thoughts? Comments?

 Should I stay away from these people? Thanks!

 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn
  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Erring on the Side of Caution....

2010-07-01 Thread Jeff Ackerman
Yeah, thats what i assume since they have not been taken off, and they
mainly have all the old dos stuff.  But i am well aware of the motorola
software licience agreement policy as well, since i work for a motorola
dealer too.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:12 PM, La Rue Communications
laruec...@gmail.comwrote:



 So Motorola wont go ofter these people since they are based in another
 country? Glad to hear they have been around a while - just didnt want any
 legal crap with the Big Bat :-)

 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Jeff Ackerman kg6u...@gmail.com
 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:05 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Erring on the Side of Caution



 That site has been around for along time, it used to be under another
 domain *www.ham.dmz.ro*, which now points to that new domain.

 On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:44 PM, La Rue Communications laruec...@gmail.com
  wrote:



 Ran across this website

 http://www.hampedia.net/motorola/mt-1000.php

 Found out it has the RSS to the Motorola MT1000. And me being the cautious
 guy to never get into legal crap with the big boys as I know how Motorola's
 Software License Agreement is big and scary..

 Is this site legitimate or is this site just asking for trouble by posting
 RSS for the general public?

 Thoughts? Comments?

 Should I stay away from these people? Thanks!

 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn


   



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Erring on the Side of Caution....

2010-07-01 Thread Jeff Ackerman
Well, RSS is very easy to find, as you found that web site, there are a few
other websites that list RSS, although, those other sites are all in other
countries, Russia, china and so forth.  the newer windows versions, CPS, is
harder to come by on the internet, its out there but not as publicly
available, mainly distributed through private exchanges, and such.  I have
seen motorola take action on there windows software when it shows up on the
internet, if you happen to find a listing for some CPS software on ebay,
watch it for a few days and usually motorola finds it and tells ebay, then
ebay cancles the auction automatically, iv herd several accounts of that,
even if your a dealer and your listing new software it will be taken off
ebay withen a day or so of listing it.   I have seen aucitons of radios and
the person will include a copy of the programming software, but in all
accounts of those, they were older not supported radios, that used the RSS
(dos) programming software, and iv not seen motorola report that kind of
auction, i however havent looked for auctions for just RSS and see if it
gets reported.

From what i can make of it all, motorola seems to not be as strict with the
older RSS as they are with the newer CPS.





Jeff Ackerman - kg6uyz
Peninsula Communications
6 Rossi Circle, Suite C
Salinas, Ca 93907
j...@peninsulacom.com


On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:38 PM, La Rue Communications
laruec...@gmail.comwrote:



 Thanks Jeff! I am curious though - if the RSS is similar to Computer
 applications (I know the RSS *IS* software) but if its obsolete, a lot of
 software vendors don't mind if the obsolete software goes public / freeware.
 Even if it was made Open Source and people could configure it to work with
 any similar Motorola radio (If possible), would Motorola get upset about
 stuff like that happening with their licensed software?

 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn

 - Original Message -
  *From:* Jeff Ackerman kg6u...@gmail.com
 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  *Sent:* Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:30 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Erring on the Side of Caution



 Yeah, thats what i assume since they have not been taken off, and they
 mainly have all the old dos stuff.  But i am well aware of the motorola
 software licience agreement policy as well, since i work for a motorola
 dealer too.

 On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:12 PM, La Rue Communications laruec...@gmail.com
  wrote:



 So Motorola wont go ofter these people since they are based in another
 country? Glad to hear they have been around a while - just didnt want any
 legal crap with the Big Bat :-)

 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Jeff Ackerman kg6u...@gmail.com
 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:05 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Erring on the Side of Caution



 That site has been around for along time, it used to be under another
 domain *www.ham.dmz.ro*, which now points to that new domain.

 On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:44 PM, La Rue Communications 
 laruec...@gmail.com wrote:



 Ran across this website

 http://www.hampedia.net/motorola/mt-1000.php

 Found out it has the RSS to the Motorola MT1000. And me being the
 cautious guy to never get into legal crap with the big boys as I know how
 Motorola's Software License Agreement is big and scary..

 Is this site legitimate or is this site just asking for trouble by
 posting RSS for the general public?

 Thoughts? Comments?

 Should I stay away from these people? Thanks!

 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn



   



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Erring on the Side of Caution....

2010-07-01 Thread Jeff Ackerman
One other thing is hams already modify there RSS to suite there needs,
mainly speaking of the 900 mhz rss for GTX's, MTX9000's and so forth.  But
alot of these hams that have this modified software are very reluctant to
let it go wild out on the net for fear of the big M cracking the whip,
therefor its all kept in a tight group, but in some cases its not.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Kris Kirby k...@catonic.us wrote:



 On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, La Rue Communications wrote:
  Thanks Jeff! I am curious though - if the RSS is similar to Computer
  applications (I know the RSS *IS* software) but if its obsolete, a lot
  of software vendors don't mind if the obsolete software goes public /
  freeware. Even if it was made Open Source and people could configure
  it to work with any similar Motorola radio (If possible), would
  Motorola get upset about stuff like that happening with their licensed
  software?

 Motorola will sue you into bankruptcy if you cross them. However, they
 have larger problems. Remember that they are selling radios that cost
 $1500+ to every agency under the sun because of the narrow-banding that
 is coming up in a few years. The secondary markets of the existing
 wideband radios will be legal Part 90 users who do not want to pay for
 the new radios, and can afford the filter and frequency
 standard replacement as well as the tech's time on the bench to make
 sure the radio is within spec. On top of those factors, many of the
 radios weren't made to deal with the splinter frequencies which will be
 used in increasing numbers in the future.

 I suppose if one was bright and wanted to hedge a few bets, one could
 buy up a large number of Maxtracs, have them sent to China, install new
 timebases and filters, check them there cheaply, then send them back to
 the US and have them checked again, programmed, and sold to the other
 Part 90 users. Or one could have 900MHz Maxtracs turned into 450MHz
 Maxtracs, keep the 2.5KHz deviation, and use HearClear. That would be
 fundamentally changing the operation of the radio and might involve
 learning 68HC11 microprocessors and reverse engineering the radio. But
 those costs are cheaper in China, where the choice is do I want to eat
 today? versus Do I want to eat next week? or I still have four
 months before they foreclose.

 Of course, the growing dependence on CODECs to achieve bandwidth savings
 in digital radio sets an artificial obsolescence point in the lifetime of
 the radio. As long as the FCC and industry keeps thinking they can
 squeeze blood from a turnip, two-way radio will see smaller allocations
 and the Big Five telecom players will enjoy allocations in the
 multi-megahertz.

 But Motorola plays in that market too.

 --
 Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
 Disinformation Analyst
  




-- 
Jeff Ackerman
Peninsula Communications
6 Rossi Circle, Suite C
Salinas, Ca 93907
j...@peninsulacom.com


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fwd: DB4379UHF combiner

2010-05-27 Thread Jeff Ackerman
If you wanted to go with 2 2ch combiners instead of 1, you can put 451.525
and 453.525 on one and 451.550 and 453.550 on another if your worried about
desence and such.  But you would want to get a hybrid coupler, 2 inputs, 1
output and 1 port for dummyload.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Ted Leonard n2...@verizon.net wrote:



 To the group,
 I received the attached e-mail from a friend in the two way business.
 Does anyone know if his goal can be met as he describes below?
 Also could someone point me to  the tuning instructions for this beast.


 Thank you,
 Ted W3VG

  Original Message 
  Subject: DB4379UHF combiner  Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 11:16:13 -0400  From:
 Robert Harvey freedom...@windstream.net freedom...@windstream.net  To:
 Ted Leonard n2...@verizon.net n2...@verizon.net

 Ted, you're the filter guy.

 I have a DB products DB4379-4404B 4 channel UHF combiner.  You did a little
 bit of tuning on it once in the shop.

 Do you know, or can you find out, if it can be turned into two, 2 channel
 combiners?

 I want to combine 461.625, 461.650, 463.625  463.650 but the combiner is
 speced at 50KHz spacing.  There are two splits of only 25KHz on the
 frequencies I need to work with.

 Combining 461.625 and 463.625 on one combiner and antenna and combine
 461.650 and 463.650 on another combiner and antenna would save me antennas
 and feedline and lots of money if I can modify the combiner I own.

 Bob

 Robert D. Harvey
 Freedom Communications, Inc
 aka: RDH / TransCom
 voice (716) 664-2659
 fax (716) 483-5968
 email freedom...@windstream.net

  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Techniques for combining multiple audio sources

2010-05-16 Thread Jeff Ackerman
what are you using? are Arcom? or Scom?

If your using a arcom, take the jumper out of the delay board headers that
jump the audio for each port, bring the audio out line
(JP10-2,JP11-2,JP12-2) from each header into a mixer, run the output of the
mixer to the audio input pin on the delay board, then just split the output
of he delayboard however you want to, to the audio input pin on the delay
board header (JP10-3,JP11-3,JP12-3), then you can set each tx level via the
onboard pots.

Not sure on the scom, have to look at a schematic.


Thats the concept anyways.

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Jim (List) jim.l...@stuckinthemud.orgwrote:



 I'm in the process of building a repeater that will have multiple ports (3
 different radios).

 Only one radio be receiving at a time, the other two transmitting.

 Therefore I have 3 audio sources (from different types of radio, at
 different levels), each being fed to the other two radios and requiring
 individual settings.

 In the middle of this I want to put a delay board, but to keep the cost
 down only have one.

 What's the best arrangement for combining the incoming audio, and then
 setting the levels for each TX?

 Thinking along the lines of a FET audio mixer for each RX, setting all to
 the same level of input to the delay board, then something on the output
 from the delay (would I need another series of buffers, or would three 100k
 pots do?) to adjust the TX level for each radio type?


 Thanks for any advice!



 Jim

  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Web site issues???

2010-04-08 Thread Jeff Ackerman
same here, reported.

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:32 AM, James Delancy ctra...@gmail.com wrote:



 I just checked it in Firefox (3.6.3 beta). It is reported as an attack
 page.

 James WJ1D


 http://www.repeater-builder.com/maxtrac/maxtrac-index.html
  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Maxtrac Channel Control

2010-04-01 Thread Jeff Ackerman
All you have to do to make your multi channel or 2 ch maxtrac, gm300 and
such channel agile is find the 2 pins on the control head header on the
logic board that have to do with channel up and down, then just short it to
ground when you want to change channels up or down, iv done this many
times.  I have 2 outputs on the back of my RC210 that pulse ground, one for
channel up and one for channel down,  cant be any more difficult, only thing
that was a little tricky on the rc210 was the pulse timing, but i figured it
out and it works great. Now just try to keep track of what channel its on
and your good to go.

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Leroy A. M. Baptiste 
leroybapti...@spiceisle.com wrote:



 Hey Steve, what did you find out? I am also
 interested in a system like that.

 Leroy. J39AI


 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com]
 On
 Behalf Of kd8biw
 Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 3:01 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Maxtrac Channel
 Control

 Thanks for the informaiton everyone! I think I got
 what I needed to make this work. The site is
 pretty empty as far a repeaters go, 2 UHF, 1 VHF,
 and a 220. Will make sure I don't interfer with
 anything, but I only need 2 or 3 channels on the
 radio. Thanks everyone for the replies and
 information!

 Steve KD8BIW

 KD8BIW/R 224.580
 N8IHI/R 147.105
 W3YXS/R 146.745
 KD8JBF/R 444.325

 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%2540yahoogroups.com
 ,

 kd8biw kd8...@... wrote:
 
  Hello everyone,
 
  Wondering if anyone has been able to implement a
 Motorola Maxtrac as a frequency agile remote
 base on a repeater. What I would like to do is
 have a 16 channel VHF mobile hooked to our
 repeater, and be able to select a channel at will.
 I'm sure it can be done, i'm just overlooking
 something here. Our controller has a 4 pin hex
 output that I think could do the necessary stuff
 to make it work, just not sure about how it needs
 hooked to the radio. Has anyone done something
 similiar to this? I was looking at NO6B's RBI, and
 that would fit the bill, just wondering if I could
 make it work with our controller (MCC RC-100) or
 would I have to get a different controller (CAT or
 LinkCom)? Thanks all!
 
  Steve KD8BIW
 
  KD8BIW/R 224.580
  N8IHI/R 147.105
  W3YXS/R 146.745
  KD8JBF/R 444.325
 

  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola MC-Micro 200mhz PA schematic

2010-02-11 Thread Jeff Ackerman
Thanks for the info mike, unfortunitly it does not have that info in it.





On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Mike Morris wa6i...@verizon.net wrote:



 At 08:33 AM 02/11/10, you wrote:

 Im looking for a schematic of a PA for the 200 mhz spit version of a
 Motorola MC-Micro, all i have found so far is the 403-433 split verson.


 This might help:
 Go to www.repeater-builder.com, then click on Motorola, then on  The R100
 and MCR100 Repeater 
 stationshttp://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip//motorola/r100/r100-index.html,
 then the third link down mentions the MC-Micro repeater.  That manual
 might have what you need.

 Mike WA6ILQ