On Apr 14, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Nate Duehr wrote:
de W5DK wrote:
Nate,
Thanks for the info, I have 4 or 5 clean 4076s that won’t go below
444/449 and still look good separation wise. I had made a call
about 6
months ago and was told the cables were all the same but the loops
are
Nate,
Thanks for bringing that to my attention!
That is weird. The info I have in the document came from a Decibel
Products catalog. We now have three freq ranges for the DB4076, all
from manufacturer documents. Hm. Since official info
conflicts, I guess all I can (or should?) do is add a
Paul N1BUG wrote:
Nate,
Thanks for bringing that to my attention!
No problem, it's a head-scratcher.
That is weird. The info I have in the document came from a Decibel
Products catalog. We now have three freq ranges for the DB4076, all
from manufacturer documents. Hm. Since official
de W5DK wrote:
Nate,
Thanks for the info, I have 4 or 5 clean 4076s that won't go below
444/449 and still look good separation wise. I had made a call about 6
months ago and was told the cables were all the same but the loops are
slightly longer on ones spec'd in the ham band. (wonder
de W5DK wrote:
Nate,
Thanks for the info, I have 4 or 5 clean 4076s that won’t go below
444/449 and still look good separation wise. I had made a call about 6
months ago and was told the cables were all the same but the loops are
slightly longer on ones spec’d in the ham band. (wonder
Nate,
Thanks for the info, I have 4 or 5 clean 4076s that won't go below 444/449
and still look good separation wise. I had made a call about 6 months ago
and was told the cables were all the same but the loops are slightly longer
on ones spec'd in the ham band. (wonder were those notes are
At 4/12/2008 01:54, you wrote:
By experimenting we found cable lengths for the tee that gave the
right picture on the HP service monitor. They ended up being slightly
longer than the original cables.
The individual halves of the duplexer (two cans, each side, one high-
pass, one low-pass) looked
Thanks Ron,
I will include these specs in the next revision of the Guide to
Duplexer Specifications on the RB site.
http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/duplexerspecs.html
I'm always keeping an eye out for data that isn't in there yet. I've
added several since the current posted version so
I found tuning instructions for the DB4055 duplexer on
the R-B website, but I haven't been able to find any
specs on this unit.
Does anyone know what the insertion loss and maximum
power ratings are?
Is the low-split version suitable for use on 2 meters?
73 and aloha
Eric KH6CQ
-Builder] DB4055 Duplexer
I found tuning instructions for the DB4055 duplexer on
the R-B website, but I haven't been able to find any
specs on this unit.
Does anyone know what the insertion loss and maximum
power ratings are?
Is the low-split version suitable for use on 2 meters
To: Repeater-Builder
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] DB4055 Duplexer
I found tuning instructions for the DB4055 duplexer
on
the R-B website, but I haven't been able to find
any
specs on this unit.
Does anyone know what the insertion loss
11 matches
Mail list logo
