reception ends? By this definition
it would not constitute a simplex repeater, right?
Jeff Condit
- Original Message - From: Tom Azlin, N4ZPT To:
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:02
AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling
At 16:34 3/24/2009, Jeff Condit wrote:
What do you call it when messages are recorded and then
retransmission begins right after reception ends? By this
definition it would not constitute a simplex repeater, right?
That is exactly m y understanding of what simplex repeater means
Jeff
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw:[DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on
Repeater Definition mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Hi Kris,
A D-STAR repeater never decodes the voice, it just
, March 25, 2009 7:28:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on Repeater
Definition
If it transmits and receives on the SAME frequency (SIMPLEX).
David
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Jeff Condit wrote:
What do you call it when messages are recorded
: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on
Repeater Definition (mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com)
(mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com)
(mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com)
Hi Kris,
A D-STAR repeater never decodes the voice, it just bitregenerates the
signal back to the data
Jeff Condit wrote:
What do you call it when messages are recorded and then
retransmission begins right after reception ends? By this definition
it would not constitute a simplex repeater, right?
Jeff Condit
I don't remember ever seeing 'simplex repeater' defined. I would expect
that for
Just because you call something a repeater doesn't mean it is.
A simplex repeater is not a repeater due to two things: 1. It does not
simultaneously retransmit, and 2. It transmits on the same frequency.
Point #1 was just clarified by the FCC Monday, but point #2 has never
been misinterpreted
of the
operation.
Milt
- Original Message -
From: Dave Gomberg da...@wcf.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on Repeater
Definition
At 16:34 3/24/2009, Jeff Condit wrote:
What do you
Hi Kris,
A D-STAR repeater never decodes the voice, it just bit regenerates the
signal back to the data stream. Yet it is a repeater for sure per the
FCC. I would say a linear transponder or translator is a repeater also.
the transmit part is active while the receive part is picking up the
: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on Repeater
Definition
Hi Kris,
A D-STAR repeater never decodes the voice, it just bit regenerates the
signal back to the data stream. Yet it is a repeater for sure per the
FCC. I would say
know, I know... ;^)
73,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: Tom Azlin, N4ZPT
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] FCC Ruling on Repeater
Definition
Hi Kris,
A D-STAR repeater
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
March 23, 2009
DA 09-657
Mr. Gary R. Mitchell
President, Northern California Packet Association
P.O. Box K
Sunnyvale, CA 94087
Re: Petition for Declaratory Ruling filed December 5, 2007
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
This is in response to the
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Eric Lemmon wrote:
Perhaps it would serve the public interest better if the actual
document were presented, rather than a copy of the text. See the
attached.
5 The Commission revised the definition in order to clarify that
certain accommodations for message
13 matches
Mail list logo
