Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding

2010-06-29 Thread Mike Morris
At 08:40 AM 06/28/10, you wrote:

  Ian Wells kerin...@... wrote:
  Currently I have no filters between the link transmitter
  and its antenna.

The next question in our Top Twenty Radio Hits - Countdown List
is do you have any spare or available cavities to try a few
things we might suggest?

Selection B   Are any extra or available to test with Cavities
configured as band-pass, notch or some combination there of?

s.


Selection C  Would you know the next winning 6 numbers for the
Wednesday Evening California Supper Lotto?

 forget Selection C

One of my friends supports a number of client sites.  Once
a week or so he has to call a tech support line to get an
answer - anyone from Dell to HP to a software vendor.
Once the system is back up he occasionally plays with the
people on the telephone tech support lines... some
companies script require the tech support person close with
the line Is there anything else I can help you with?

He always says Yes, in fact, six winning numbers.   Most of the
time that line gets a good laugh, followed by anything from
Sorry, me first, on down.   Only once in the last six months
has he had a Huh?



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding

2010-06-28 Thread skipp025

 Ian Wells kerin...@... wrote:
 Currently I have no filters between the link transmitter 
 and its antenna.

The next question in our Top Twenty Radio Hits - Countdown List 
is do you have any spare or available cavities to try a few 
things we might suggest? 

Selection B   Are any extra or available to test with Cavities 
configured as band-pass, notch or some combination there of? 

s. 


Selection C  Would you know the next winning 6 numbers for the 
Wednesday Evening California Supper Lotto?  

 forget Selection C



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding

2010-06-28 Thread kerincom
 
I have a bandpass/band notch diplexer that I am currently tuning up to
replace the 6ld450s so we will see how it goes shortly .

 
 
 
  
Thank You,
Ian Wells,
Kerinvale Comaudio,
3A Murchison Street,Biloela.4715
Ph 0749922449 or 0409159932 or 0749922574
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
 
---Original Message---
 
From: skipp025
Date: 6/29/2010 1:44:33 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding
 
  

 Ian Wells kerin...@... wrote:
 Currently I have no filters between the link transmitter 
 and its antenna.

The next question in our Top Twenty Radio Hits - Countdown List 
is do you have any spare or available cavities to try a few 
things we might suggest? 

Selection B Are any extra or available to test with Cavities 
configured as band-pass, notch or some combination there of? 

s. 

Selection C Would you know the next winning 6 numbers for the 
Wednesday Evening California Supper Lotto? 

 forget Selection C



 

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding

2010-06-27 Thread skipp025

 kerincom  kerin...@... wrote:
 Hi guys .I am just wanted to confirm a question on 
 coax shielding .

Simple answer... It's there and never seems to behave exactly 
how you would expect it to. 

 With 2-10 watts transmitting through rg213u  could RF be 
 escaping that could cause desensitization to other radios. 

RF can escape through some types of hard line (believe it or 
not). There always will be local area RF around, just a question 
of how much is coming through/from the coax braid and what if 
any grief it may be causing.  If you're working at the 2 to 10 
watt (what many of us assume is a fairly low) power level and 
you've got desense gremlins, smart money says you probably (also) 
have other or additional issues to deal with. 

 The repeater I have setup uses 9 meters of heliax from the 
 main diplexer to ant and rg213u from the link radio to its 
 antenna.

Nothing wrong with RG-213u especially when compared to other 
possible choices like someone using RG-58au. Just a question of 
loss per length and your preference with the end result values 
when you use/install it. 

 I am finding I am getting problems with the link transmission 
 interfering with the  repeater rx. The link antenna is a yagi 
 3 meters above the ground and the main repeater antenna is 6 
 meters above it. 

So do some testing... put a termination (dummy load) on the end 
of the feed-line (regardless of the type you're using) at the 
Link-Yagi end. See if the problem goes away when you've got the 
Link Radio (transmitter) working at full power into the test 
termination (load). 

 I am currently trying band pass cavity on the receiver rx or 
 band pass/band reject diplexer with some success but I am 
 wondering if the rf escaping from the cable is causing
 problems inside the repeater shed even at a low wattage. 

The proper type and placement of cavities will help, but you 
should first consider the Link Tx Termination Test I mention 
above. You don't yet know where the problem really originates 
from and you don't mention what type of repeater receiver 
you're using. Should we assume it's something of decent 
quality and that you have it properly protected. 

And what's the repeater transmitter doing when the link is 
active? Do you make the classic mistake of tie-wrapping the 
feed lines into one big bunch? 

 I am definitely changing the rg213u to either rg223u or lmr400 
 as it is only on the link radio and shouldn't have any effect 
 on the repeater's operation. 

Please... 
If you feel you must change the feed line, don't use any LMR 
type of coaxial line or you'll be wasting your and our time with 
additional problems. LMR-400 is not good coax to use in and 
around duplex (repeater) radio or any high adjacent RF 
environments. 

 Has anyone else had the same sort of problem where the rf 
 energy leaks out of the cable in the shed and causes problems 
 to the repeater and they had to upgrade the link cable to 
 100% coverage cable

You're not yet sure that's the problem and I'll bet the coax 
shielding value is not the large problem contribution you think 
it is.  We'd need to know more about the radios, antennas, power 
levels, receiver and transmitter filtering (what we call 
Duplexer) or pre-selectors and notch cavities you might 
have around. Even though you're running RG-213u, it's not the 
best but when applied in modest length runs it's not the train 
wreck you might think it is. 

And you're on the bottom side of the earth in Auzzie Land so we 
have to flip the computer screen upside down to read your 
posts, but that's relatively easy.   

:-) 

 Thank You,
 Ian Wells,

your turn, 
s. 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding

2010-06-27 Thread kerincom
 
Hi skip .The repeater radios are maxon sm4450sc and the link is a tait t2010
The test I have tried in the past have been definitely point to the link
being the problem as when we turn the link off the repeater works to its
full range but with it on we get desence.
We used to have the link closer to the repeaters aprox 487mhz but we shifted
it to 517mhz to fix desense and we find we are still having problems.I think
the white noise could be the issue but I  tried a notch on the link cable
tuned to the  repeaters receive and that seem to cause more interference and
weaken the links Transmit range.I wondered about putting a BP cavity filter
inline with the link but since our link frequencies are 5.2mhz apart I feel
you can only tuned the filter for either TX or rx frequencies and not  both
Unless maybe you can install two in pararell ,one  tuned to TX and the other
rx .
 
 
  
Thank You,
Ian Wells,
Kerinvale Comaudio,
3A Murchison Street,Biloela.4715
Ph 0749922449 or 0409159932 or 0749922574
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
 
---Original Message---
 
From: skipp025
Date: 6/28/2010 2:50:00 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding
 
  

 kerincom  kerin...@... wrote:
 Hi guys .I am just wanted to confirm a question on 
 coax shielding .


 

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding

2010-06-27 Thread Mark HARRISON
Hi Ian,

I think I'd be taking a close look at both transmitters with a spectrum 
analyser and seeing if they are both suitable for repeater work.  I'm not 
familiar with either radio, but usually radios designed for duplex work go to a 
lot more trouble with internal shielding than your average mobile set.

The other issue to consider is the impedance matching between all the 
components in the system.  If the SWR is bad somewhere then there will be RF 
voltage on the outside of the coax linking mis-matched devices, regardless of 
how good the coax is.
For instance if the link transmitter is seeing a high SWR into it's bandpass 
cavity then the jumper cable could be radiating unfiltered noise straight into 
the repeater receiver cable.
It could also be that putting the bandpass filter in line has upset the SWR 
seen by the Link Tx and now radiates MORE noise in the shack.  I've also seen 
some cavities make PA stages become unstable, creating very broad band noise, 
requiring both the cavities and PA to be retuned to solve the problem.

73,Mark VK3BYY



From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of kerincom
Sent: Monday, 28 June 2010 08:19 AM
To: mail=repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding

Hi skip .The repeater radios are maxon sm4450sc and the link is a tait 
t2010.The test I have tried in the past have been definitely point to the link 
being the problem as when we turn the link off the repeater works to its full 
range but with it on we get desence.
We used to have the link closer to the repeaters aprox 487mhz but we shifted it 
to 517mhz to fix desense and we find we are still having problems.I think the 
white noise could be the issue but I  tried a notch on the link cable tuned to 
the  repeaters receive and that seem to cause more interference and weaken the 
links Transmit range.I wondered about putting a BP cavity filter inline with 
the link but since our link frequencies are 5.2mhz apart I feel you can only 
tuned the filter for either TX or rx frequencies and not  both
Unless maybe you can install two in pararell ,one  tuned to TX and the other rx 
.
 
Thank You,
Ian Wells,
Kerinvale Comaudio,
3A Murchison Street,Biloela.4715
Ph 0749922449 or 0409159932 or 0749922574
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.auhttp://www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au/









RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding

2010-06-27 Thread Ian Wells
Currently I have no filters between the link transmitter and its antenna.

Thank You ,Ian Wells
Kerinvale Comaudio,
3A Murchison Street, Biloela.4715
Ph 0749922449 Mb 0409159932 
Hm 0749922574 Fx 0749922767
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Mark HARRISON
Date: 06/28/10 11:10:52
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding
 
  
 
Hi Ian,
 
I think I'd be taking a close look at both transmitters with a spectrum
analyser and seeing if they are both suitable for repeater work.  I'm not
familiar with either radio, but usually radios designed for duplex work go
to a lot more trouble with internal shielding than your average mobile set. 
 
The other issue to consider is the impedance matching between all the
components in the system.  If the SWR is bad somewhere then there will be RF
voltage on the outside of the coax linking mis-matched devices, regardless
of how good the coax is.
For instance if the link transmitter is seeing a high SWR into it's bandpass
cavity then the jumper cable could be radiating unfiltered noise straight
into the repeater receiver cable.
It could also be that putting the bandpass filter in line has upset the SWR
seen by the Link Tx and now radiates MORE noise in the shack.  I've also
seen some cavities make PA stages become unstable, creating very broad band
noise, requiring both the cavities and PA to be retuned to solve the problem

 
73,Mark VK3BYY
 
 



From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups
com] On Behalf Of kerincom 
Sent: Monday, 28 June 2010 08:19 AM
To: mail=repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax shielding
 
Hi skip .The repeater radios are maxon sm4450sc and the link is a tait t2010
The test I have tried in the past have been definitely point to the link
being the problem as when we turn the link off the repeater works to its
full range but with it on we get desence.
We used to have the link closer to the repeaters aprox 487mhz but we shifted
it to 517mhz to fix desense and we find we are still having problems.I think
the white noise could be the issue but I  tried a notch on the link cable
tuned to the  repeaters receive and that seem to cause more interference and
weaken the links Transmit range.I wondered about putting a BP cavity filter
inline with the link but since our link frequencies are 5.2mhz apart I feel
you can only tuned the filter for either TX or rx frequencies and not  both
Unless maybe you can install two in pararell ,one  tuned to TX and the other
rx .
  
Thank You,
Ian Wells,
Kerinvale Comaudio,
3A Murchison Street,Biloela.4715
Ph 0749922449 or 0409159932 or 0749922574
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
 




 faint_grain.jpg