Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
Speaking of which, if I read it correctly, 2-meters is now available for
auxiliary stations. Anybody dared try it yet?
A couple of hundred EchoLink and IRLP simplex node owners, even prior to
the law change? Or anyone who was in-band linking VHF repeaters? FM 2m
,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: Nate Duehr
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Control Link
Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
Speaking of which, if I read it correctly, 2-meters is now available
Don't confuse auxiliary operaton with a Remotely controlled station.
The latter was quite legal in 2M even before the rules change.
Joe M.
Nate Duehr wrote:
Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
Speaking of which, if I read it correctly, 2-meters is now available for
auxiliary stations. Anybody dared
@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 3:04 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Control Link
Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
Speaking of which, if I read it correctly, 2-meters is now available for
auxiliary
] ups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 3:04 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Control Link
Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
Speaking of which, if I read it correctly, 2-meters is now available
for auxiliary stations. Anybody dared try
Of
Ron Wright
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 10:17 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Control Link
The rules did state what frequencies could be used for control. It was the
same as AUXILARY frequencies. Recent changes did add 2 meters and included
145.5
PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Control Link
It certainly makes sense. With all the randomness in the universe, I
guarantee that two of us in the same town would probably pick the same
control frequency and tone!
Mike
WM4B
From: Repeater-Builder
[mailto:Repeater-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com] On Behalf Of Ron Wright
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 10:17 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Control Link
The rules did state what frequencies could be used for control. It was
the same as AUXILARY frequencies
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Control Link
The rules did state what frequencies could be used for control. It was
the same as AUXILARY frequencies. Recent changes did add 2 meters and
included 145.5-145.8, out of the repeater band. Some started putting
Many repeater coordinators want to know control freqs so they can advise
if maybe a repeater input/output they want to protect. This way someone
not so familiar with the band plans does not put something on that will
lead to problems for both another repeater or to ones self. Also the
- Original Message -
From: Howard Klino
SERA does require that you co-ordinate your control frequency. It will be
an unpublished frequency. Also suggest that you use a sub tone. They will
probably request that anyway.
Missouri Repeater Council is thatway, too.
Ray
, 2008 7:46 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Control Link
- Original Message -
From: Howard Klino
SERA does require that you co-ordinate your control frequency. It will be
an unpublished frequency. Also suggest that you use a sub tone
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Control Link
It certainly makes sense. With all the randomness in the universe, I
guarantee that two of us in the same town would probably pick the same
control frequency and tone!
Mike
WM4B
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto
13 matches
Mail list logo
