Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers

2007-09-04 Thread allan crites
Ron Wright, C'mon Ron, I asked to get a feel for the references used in your explanation of how coax has a lower freq limit, not a compilation of your library collection. It appears that when you get a specific question you cannot provide an answer to, you go into a rambling dialog

Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers

2007-09-03 Thread Ron Wright
From: Gary Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007/09/02 Sun PM 09:07:18 CDT To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers Isn’t it interesting to note thatthe impedance goes UP at low frequencies

Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers

2007-09-03 Thread Ron Wright
This could be correct in that say a 50 Ohm coax at 10 MHz would be say 120 Ohms at 100 kHz or 90 Ohms at 50 kHz...freq dependent. There is still L and C. However, this would have to be for a specific design or application. It would affect wideband stuff like video and it does. I guess one

RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers

2007-09-03 Thread Jeff DePolo
One can see there becomes a point where the coax will not look like coax at low frequencies or atleast have a characteristic impedance of something other than it normal value. Most of this is true (although I don't know what you mean by coax will not look like coax), and I already

Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers

2007-09-03 Thread Jesse Lloyd
Hahaha a audiophiles... can sell them anything no need for real physics, just tell them that this device will make things sound better, back it up with a BS statment that doesn't apply, and charge them 100 bux. On 9/3/07, Jeff DePolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One can see there

Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers

2007-09-03 Thread Ron Wright
Allan, Well I think most on here do not quote their sources for many got info long time ago and from many sources. If you want a list of some of what I got...well ok: Reference Data for Radio Engineers, ITT (have had about 30 years so probably should update, but still the RF stuff is pretty

Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers

2007-09-02 Thread Ron Wright
Jesse, You got it, well said. If you take a simple 100 ft piece of 1/4 superflex a typical value for its C=2400pf, L=6 uH and R=570 Ohm. At 5 Hz the Ls and Cs mean little compared to the R. At 10 MHz Ls and Cs mean a lot compared to the R. One can see there becomes a point where the coax will

Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers

2007-09-02 Thread Ron Wright
Jeff, I have plenty of text books here, oh well. All refer to impedance as Z and Z=R+jX or Z = magnitude and phase angle. A 500 Ohm resistor has an impedance of 500 Ohms or 500+j0 or 500 0 deg phase. I think in Jesse's and my last posting you might see about the low and high freq

Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers

2007-09-02 Thread Jesse Lloyd
So to plug some numbers in: Say you have a cable with the following specs (50 ohm cable) Capacitance of 100.3 pF/m Inducatance of 251 nH/m Resistane of 0.164 ohms/m Shunt conductance of 12.8 mS/m Zo = sqrt [ (R + j 2 pi f L ) / (G + j 2 pi f C ) ] at 100 Hz= 113 ohms at 1 Khz= 111 ohms at

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers

2007-09-02 Thread Gary Schafer
. 73 Gary K4FMX _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jesse Lloyd Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 4:10 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers So