Hi!
On Fri, 2016-01-01 at 00:59:31 +, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Diederik de Haas
> wrote:
> > I'm adding my info to this bug report as I would have choosen the same
> > title, even though the steps/behavior aren't the same.
>
> they are actually different situati
Oeps, didn't sent it to the bug as I intended.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Bug#690537: reportbug: Package list does not specify arch
Date: Friday 01 January 2016, 16:05:06
From: Diederik de Haas
To: Sandro Tosi
On Friday 01 January 2016 00:59:31 you wrote:
> > I'm add
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> I'm adding my info to this bug report as I would have choosen the same
> title, even though the steps/behavior aren't the same.
they are actually different situations.
> Earlier today I have reported bug #805132
> (https://bugs.debian.or
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.6.5
Followup-For: Bug #690537
I'm adding my info to this bug report as I would have choosen the same
title, even though the steps/behavior aren't the same.
Earlier today I have reported bug #805132
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805132) with title
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.4.3
Severity: normal
_Steps to reproduce_
Invoke reportbug with a binary package name which fulfills the following
conditions:
- it is not a source package name at the same time
- you have this package installed for multiple architectures
Two packages which match