Sorry for the cross post but this seems relevant to both these groups.
I was thinking about the subject of mirroring and redirection for the
ASF Repository. Currently, there was some discussion on the Depot list
concerning this. I feel we could address this subject again for both
groups interest
- Original Message -
From: "Mark R. Diggory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 8:48 AM
Subject: ASF Repository, closer.cgi and Depot
> Sorry for the cross post but this seems relevant to both these groups.
>
> I was thinking about the subject o
On 14.07.2004, at 17:40, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Mark R. Diggory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 8:48 AM
Subject: ASF Repository, closer.cgi and Depot
...snipped a lot of good points...
Hmm, it seems to me that infra@
Erik Abele wrote:
I suspect their views would include what you suggest, that
distribution might
save some nomimal (c.f. artifact sizes) bandwidth savings & give some
CPU
saving, but it'd be at significant loss of 'control' (of well behaved
clients). Central control over this seems the most appeal
On 14.07.2004, at 19:57, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
But then this becomes a project spanning both the Repository group and
the various clients out there "Depot/Maven/etc". And agreement on the
GEO_IP request protocol and xml format etc becomes a touchy subject
don't they?
Maybe but as I understood i
