Re: Maven and repository@apache.org

2005-01-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 12:18, Russell Gold wrote: Is there currently a policy for how long files are kept in the repository? It seems to me that old versions are not kept very long at ibiblio, if there are newer versions available. I am not sure if you are talking about the Transit client

Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist (fwd)

2005-01-11 Thread Henk P. Penning
Hi, [ I cut this from another message ; I hope it is correct ] --On Wednesday, January 5, 2005 6:43 AM +1100 Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is for Maven users (and possible future tools, eg I believe Ant 1.7 has repository support) to be able to get your releases easily

Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist (fwd)

2005-01-11 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Mark R. Diggory wrote: Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:04:31 -0500 From: Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist (fwd) Mixed terminology again. if the SNAPSHOT refers to a fully

Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist (fwd)

2005-01-11 Thread Brett Porter
Henk, My bad. I copied it to the wrong location. I fixed the JARs, forgot the POMs and will remove them next time I have SSH access. - Brett On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:34:44 +0100 (MET), Henk P. Penning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Mark R. Diggory wrote: Date: Tue, 11 Jan

Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist (fwd)

2005-01-11 Thread Dion Gillard
I'd say it is a development snapshot. Brett has been working on the site plugin, and looks like he published it to the wrong place. On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:56:30 +0100 (MET), Henk P. Penning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, [ I cut this from another message ; I hope it is correct ] --On

Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist (fwd)

2005-01-11 Thread Dion Gillard
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:04:31 -0500, Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mixed terminology again. if the SNAPSHOT refers to a fully sanctioned release not an interim or daily build, then the usage is fine. Remember in this case SNAPSHOT is no different than LATEST or CURRENT. I wish we

Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist (fwd)

2005-01-11 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Brett Porter wrote: Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:39:54 +1100 From: Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist (fwd) Henk, My bad. I copied it to the wrong location. I fixed the JARs,

Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist (fwd)

2005-01-11 Thread Brett Porter
Mark is planning to do this. Timestamped builds aren't official releases either, though in some cases they have been used so care is needed. Most important is that the proper use of these repositories is properly documented and communicated to avoid it happening in the future. Robert from Jakarta