Is there currently a policy for how long files are kept in the
repository? It seems to me that old versions are not kept very long at
ibiblio, if there are newer versions available.
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 12:18, Russell Gold wrote:
> Is there currently a policy for how long files are kept in the
> repository? It seems to me that old versions are not kept very long at
> ibiblio, if there are newer versions available.
I am not sure if you are talking about the Transit clien
Hi,
[ I cut this from another message ; I hope it is correct ]
--On Wednesday, January 5, 2005 6:43 AM +1100 Brett Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is for Maven users (and possible future tools, eg I believe Ant 1.7
> has repository support) to be able to get your releases easily (re
Mixed terminology again. if the "SNAPSHOT" refers to a fully sanctioned
release not an interim or daily build, then the usage is fine. Remember
in this case SNAPSHOT is no different than "LATEST" or "CURRENT". I wish
we could have Maven folks explore usage of a more accurate terminology
for the
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:04:31 -0500
> From: Mark R. Diggory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist
> (fwd)
>
> Mixed terminology again. if the "SNAPSHOT" refers to a fu
Henk,
My bad. I copied it to the wrong location. I fixed the JARs, forgot
the POMs and will remove them next time I have SSH access.
- Brett
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:34:44 +0100 (MET), Henk P. Penning
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Ja
I'd say it is a development snapshot. Brett has been working on the
site plugin, and looks like he published it to the wrong place.
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:56:30 +0100 (MET), Henk P. Penning
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ I cut this from another message ; I hope it is correct ]
>
> --O
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:04:31 -0500, Mark R. Diggory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mixed terminology again. if the "SNAPSHOT" refers to a fully sanctioned
> release not an interim or daily build, then the usage is fine. Remember
> in this case SNAPSHOT is no different than "LATEST" or "CURRENT". I wi
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Brett Porter wrote:
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:39:54 +1100
> From: Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Where to publish Xalan code on http://www.apache.org/dist
> (fwd)
>
> Henk,
>
> My bad. I copied it to the wrong location. I fixed th
Mark is planning to do this. Timestamped builds aren't official
releases either, though in some cases they have been used so care is
needed.
Most important is that the proper use of these repositories is
properly documented and communicated to avoid it happening in the
future. Robert from Jakarta
10 matches
Mail list logo