Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 15:02, Alex Karasulu wrote:
So really, who cares about CJAN. The spec that goes defacto is the one
manifest in the mechanism used by the most people. Unless of course
SUN
steps in at some point
On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 15:02, Alex Karasulu wrote:
So really, who cares about CJAN. The spec that goes defacto is the
one
manifest in the mechanism used by the most people. Unless of course
SUN
steps in at some point and tries to propose a JSR w
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 14:41, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
...
We should seriously consider establishing a "standards" community
to establish supporting efforts such as this.
This list is our "standards" community.
While trying to maintain a tone of fairn
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 17:20, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 16:12, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
>
> > However, by following a similar line of reasoning you could take for an
> > analogy that IE is the predominate browser on the market, so what ever
> > it defines as a DOM model or CSS impl
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 16:12, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> However, by following a similar line of reasoning you could take for an
> analogy that IE is the predominate browser on the market, so what ever
> it defines as a DOM model or CSS implementation would be the standard,
> but yet, we all know thi
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 14:41, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> ...
> > We should seriously consider establishing a "standards" community
> > to establish supporting efforts such as this.
>
> This list is our "standards" community.
While trying to maintain a tone of fairness I
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 15:02, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > So really, who cares about CJAN. The spec that goes defacto is the one
> > manifest in the mechanism used by the most people. Unless of course SUN
> > steps in at some point and tries to propose a JSR which wouldn't
> > surprise me at all.
>
>
> So really, who cares about CJAN. The spec that goes defacto is the one
> manifest in the mechanism used by the most people. Unless of course SUN
> steps in at some point and tries to propose a JSR which wouldn't
> surprise me at all.
It's such an undertaking that it might be good to have a JSR a
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
...
We should seriously consider establishing a "standards" community
to establish supporting efforts such as this.
This list is our "standards" community.
CJAN been hard at work with alot of "documentation effort". What are
individuals thoughts on this project and its model?
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 13:20, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> I looked through the documentation and the proposals really are not
> much. They're one pager brain dumps of nice to haves and standards that
> are to be followed. There really is not much to cjan.org at this point
> besides the web façade and
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark R. Diggory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> When we talk about distributed Maven repositories, ASF repositories etc
> that are related to "Java". I think we should consider that CPAN/CRAN
> etc are models of distributing such content that have been successf
11 matches
Mail list logo
