As a general improvement (in terms of clarity) and as part of the
efforts of getting Chameleon working on GAE, I've begun reworking the
compilation stage.
If not explicitly disabled (using ``CHAMELEON_CACHE=0``), template
files (ending in .pt) will be compiled with the result written to a
2009/5/9 Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com:
We can't go straight to .pyc? Won't GAE execute .pyc files?
Who knows. By the way, can someone confirm if the GAE supports the
``execfile`` built-in? It doesn't seem to provide the ``imp`` module
which we currently use to load and compile template
Chris McDonough wrote:
On 5/9/09 9:12 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
It'd be nice if there was a way to name the files that meant people
won't accidentally commit a bunch of compiled .py files that may then
end up conflicting later.
Maybe there could be a mode to compile template files directly
Malthe Borch wrote:
As a general improvement (in terms of clarity) and as part of the
efforts of getting Chameleon working on GAE, I've begun reworking the
compilation stage.
Yeah!
3) If the ``CHAMELEON_STATIC`` flag is enabled, compile into
one-method-fits-all-arguments render methods for
2009/5/9 Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu:
Do we really need to be able to switch this mode via CHAMELEON_STATIC?
I'd be tempted to make the static mode the default and not have it
configurable. The whole compilation process is already quite complicated
and I wouldn't want to increase
2009/5/9 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com:
Excellent! Thanks very much for this contribution.
Thanks
Would you be open
to others registering build slaves (e.g., MacOX, Windows, FreeBSD, etc.)?
Of course. Don't forget to say the buildbot you want to serve (zope3,
bfg, grok, misc).
Nota:
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 18:14, Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com wrote:
http://bfg.buildbot.securactive.org/waterfall
new summary page:
http://buildbot.securactive.org/
--
Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
HI Chris
Sunday morning, forgot to reply-all
sorry
Will forward the other emails now
T
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On 5/9/09 9:10 PM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
The more I think/understand the way chameleon works the less likely I
think it is going to
The more I think/understand the way chameleon works the less likely I
think it is going to work.
As I sent out the app engine sdk know includes a modified _ast module
so maybe it will work
(but haven't tried it myself the inclusion was to get genshi working
in the main), but I think the only
