Hey Chris et. al, I'm seriously considering switching my main platform
for our inhouse framework to mostly repoze.bfg with auxillary pylons
bits from the other way around, but have a few concerns that mostly
relate to making sure that clients buy into our platform of choice and
feel like they aren'
Hey folks, just floating the idea of splitting the issue tracker
mailouts on to their own mailing list? In my experience on this and
other lists, it's a lot more pleasant to read the mailing list without
having to scroll through the issue tracking comments. Just a thought.
Iain
__
Hey folks, in the what's new for 1.1 I found this:
In repoze.bfg 1.0, the @bfg_view decorator could not be used on class
methods. In 1.1, the @bfg_view decorator can be used against a class
method:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
from webob import Response
from repoze.bfg.view import bfg_view
Wondering if it would be possible to add a paster starter template for
bgf_routes ( no sqlalchemy )? Seems to be a missing piece.
Thanks!
Iain
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Hey all, one thing I miss in Pylons is the out of the box integration
with the interactive debugger in your browser. I'll confess ignorance as
to how this is hooked up, but it's *really* helpful to people learning
pylons. Wondering if it would be a good plan to put this 'in the box'
for bfg or mayb
Iain Duncan wrote:
> Hey Chris et. al, I'm seriously considering switching my main platform
> for our inhouse framework to mostly repoze.bfg with auxillary pylons
> bits from the other way around, but have a few concerns that mostly
> relate to making sure that clients buy into our platform of choi
Iain Duncan wrote:
> Hey all, one thing I miss in Pylons is the out of the box integration
> with the interactive debugger in your browser. I'll confess ignorance as
> to how this is hooked up, but it's *really* helpful to people learning
> pylons. Wondering if it would be a good plan to put this '
Iain Duncan wrote:
> Am I missing something terribly obvious, or is that not just a regular
> instance method in the example? Or am I misunderstanding the point?
> Perhaps this part could be clearer, it's confused me at any rate.
I'm not really clear how to make changes to make it clearer. What a
Iain Duncan wrote:
> Wondering if it would be possible to add a paster starter template for
> bgf_routes ( no sqlalchemy )? Seems to be a missing piece.
Instead of adding another a paster template, we could just answer whatever
concrete questions you have about routing? Each paster template we a
2009/11/23 Iain Duncan :
> Hey folks, just floating the idea of splitting the issue tracker
> mailouts on to their own mailing list? In my experience on this and
> other lists, it's a lot more pleasant to read the mailing list without
> having to scroll through the issue tracking comments. Just a t
10 matches
Mail list logo
