Re: [Repoze-dev] chameleon zpt: structure or not?

2011-03-02 Thread Malthe Borch
On 2 March 2011 03:28, Shane Hathaway wrote: > I hope this isn't a XSS hole.  I can't think of a way to add a

Re: [Repoze-dev] chameleon zpt: structure or not?

2011-03-02 Thread Malthe Borch
On 2 March 2011 03:36, Shane Hathaway wrote: > Also, a quirky behavior of the reference TAL implementation is if you use > unknown attribute names in the "tal" namespace, those attributes get > stripped from the output.  It's a useful feature; it allows me to write > comments about a tag.  I alway

Re: [Repoze-dev] chameleon zpt: structure or not?

2011-03-02 Thread Malthe Borch
On 2 March 2011 08:18, Chris Withers wrote: > Interesting, I use this technique a lot, and I didn't experience this > problem with my brief test of 2.0-rc2. Mind you, Shane means tal:comment in *attributes*: ... I think this is a fairly quirky feature of ZPT. Actually, I'd be inclin

Re: [Repoze-dev] chameleon zpt: structure or not?

2011-03-02 Thread Shane Hathaway
On 03/02/2011 01:12 AM, Malthe Borch wrote: This could be changed, but it's true that in 2.x (and I realize now that I haven't written that down anywhere), the pipe character is not in play with Python-expressions. However, it is implemented and working for "path:" in ``z3c.pt``, e.g.: "path:

Re: [Repoze-dev] chameleon zpt: structure or not?

2011-03-02 Thread Malthe Borch
On 2 March 2011 19:27, Shane Hathaway wrote: > I think it's unwise to support this meaning of the pipe character in Python > expressions.  I say the new behavior is better. Great. \malthe ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://l