Re: [Repoze-dev] current repoze.who in PyPI and repoze.what

2010-04-06 Thread Gustavo Narea
Thank you, Tres!

I'll release repoze.what 1.0.9 now.

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Tres Seaver  wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chris McDonough wrote:
> > On 4/6/10 2:27 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
> >> Yep thats what found.
> >>
> >> But at the moment if you easy_install repoze.what you end up with
> >> repoze.who.2.0.x and you can't seem to get
> >> repoze.who 1.0.18 from PyPI
> >
> > Yeah.  I fear the only people that can help are people who have access to
> > update the PyPI record for repoze.what.  I don't have the appropriate
> level of
> > access.  Does anyone have that access?
>
> That would be Gustavo or Percious (CC'ed).  Note that I tagged
> repoze.what 1.0.9, pinning repoze.who <= 1.99  so that those folks could
> release a version which would force the older repoze.who.
>
>
> Tres.
> - --
> ===
> Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
> Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAku65PUACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7rBwCg1LxxCF8K2vFT7kfZNtN1s94L
> F9oAn0o6eeFfjRqk9ZKJO0+mFHQ1zSvd
> =iahR
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev


Re: [Repoze-dev] current repoze.who in PyPI and repoze.what

2010-04-06 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Chris McDonough wrote:
> On 4/6/10 2:27 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
>> Yep thats what found.
>>
>> But at the moment if you easy_install repoze.what you end up with
>> repoze.who.2.0.x and you can't seem to get
>> repoze.who 1.0.18 from PyPI
> 
> Yeah.  I fear the only people that can help are people who have access to 
> update the PyPI record for repoze.what.  I don't have the appropriate level 
> of 
> access.  Does anyone have that access?

That would be Gustavo or Percious (CC'ed).  Note that I tagged
repoze.what 1.0.9, pinning repoze.who <= 1.99  so that those folks could
release a version which would force the older repoze.who.


Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAku65PUACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7rBwCg1LxxCF8K2vFT7kfZNtN1s94L
F9oAn0o6eeFfjRqk9ZKJO0+mFHQ1zSvd
=iahR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev


Re: [Repoze-dev] current repoze.who in PyPI and repoze.what

2010-04-05 Thread Chris McDonough
On 4/6/10 2:27 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
> Yep thats what found.
>
> But at the moment if you easy_install repoze.what you end up with
> repoze.who.2.0.x and you can't seem to get
> repoze.who 1.0.18 from PyPI

Yeah.  I fear the only people that can help are people who have access to 
update the PyPI record for repoze.what.  I don't have the appropriate level of 
access.  Does anyone have that access?

- C
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev


Re: [Repoze-dev] current repoze.who in PyPI and repoze.what

2010-04-05 Thread Tim Hoffman
Yep thats what found.

But at the moment if you easy_install repoze.what you end up with
repoze.who.2.0.x and you can't seem to get
repoze.who 1.0.18 from PyPI

T

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Chris McDonough  wrote:
> On 4/6/10 1:12 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have been using repoze.what (1.0.8) and (due to dependancies)
>> repoze.who 1.0.18 for the last couple of months.
>> Today we where setting up a new instance and found that repoze.who
>> 2.0.a2 was coming down from PyPI as it is
>> the most recent version and repoze.who 1.0.18 was hidden.
>>
>> We found code that was working was now failing silently (changes with
>> aut_tkt I believe)  (ok maybe not an error but user auth that was
>> working stopped haven't found out yet
>> what exactly was going wrong).
>>
>> Is 2.0.xx of repoze.who supposed to be the correct version for
>> repoze.what 1.0.18 it looks like repoze.what dependancies on
>> repoze.who is just>  1.0 ?
>
> I'd use the 1.X version of r.who for best compatibility.
>
> - C
>
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev


Re: [Repoze-dev] current repoze.who in PyPI and repoze.what

2010-04-05 Thread Chris McDonough
On 4/6/10 1:12 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been using repoze.what (1.0.8) and (due to dependancies)
> repoze.who 1.0.18 for the last couple of months.
> Today we where setting up a new instance and found that repoze.who
> 2.0.a2 was coming down from PyPI as it is
> the most recent version and repoze.who 1.0.18 was hidden.
>
> We found code that was working was now failing silently (changes with
> aut_tkt I believe)  (ok maybe not an error but user auth that was
> working stopped haven't found out yet
> what exactly was going wrong).
>
> Is 2.0.xx of repoze.who supposed to be the correct version for
> repoze.what 1.0.18 it looks like repoze.what dependancies on
> repoze.who is just>  1.0 ?

I'd use the 1.X version of r.who for best compatibility.

- C
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev


[Repoze-dev] current repoze.who in PyPI and repoze.what

2010-04-05 Thread Tim Hoffman
Hi

I have been using repoze.what (1.0.8) and (due to dependancies)
repoze.who 1.0.18 for the last couple of months.
Today we where setting up a new instance and found that repoze.who
2.0.a2 was coming down from PyPI as it is
the most recent version and repoze.who 1.0.18 was hidden.

We found code that was working was now failing silently (changes with
aut_tkt I believe)  (ok maybe not an error but user auth that was
working stopped haven't found out yet
what exactly was going wrong).

Is 2.0.xx of repoze.who supposed to be the correct version for
repoze.what 1.0.18 it looks like repoze.what dependancies on
repoze.who is just > 1.0 ?

Thanks

T
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev