Chris Rossi wrote:
FWIW, I can imagine something spelled sort of like:
@bfg_view(name='something', overrides='baseapp.views.someview')
def my_view(request):
+lots
Yeah, I hadn't replied 'cos I couldn't think of how to spell what I was
after.
This is spot on, and would, in theory, allow an
Am 06.05.2010, 10:10 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk:
This is spot on, and would, in theory, allow an app to override a
library that overrides a framework.
Cue lots of Jim like wooah! comments and it's all Chris' fault in the
code! ;-)
Charlie
--
Charlie Clark
Managing
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 06.05.2010, 10:10 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk:
This is spot on, and would, in theory, allow an app to override a
library that overrides a framework.
Cue lots of Jim like wooah!
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 10:36 -0400, Chris Rossi wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 06.05.2010, 10:10 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk:
This is spot on, and would, in theory, allow an app to override a
library
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 10:36 -0400, Chris Rossi wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 06.05.2010, 10:10 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk:
On 05/06/2010 08:49 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'm also not sure that this can be advertised as an overrides strategy
100% comparable to ZCML unless all the various ZCML directives get
Python declarative equivalents.
So.. yeah, I think there's a cool idea lurking in here, but I'm not sure
we
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 19:19 +0200, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 05.05.2010, 02:18 Uhr, schrieb Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com:
Relying on scan ordering is like relying on import ordering to do
configuration in an
Chris McDonough wrote:
On 04/29/2010 07:32 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
No. You can always override an individual registration (obtained via
imperative configuration, a scan, or via ZCML) with a subsequent
imperative registration.
Okay, but how would I override a
On 04/28/2010 03:07 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
In the BFG book their are copious references to the fact that using
imperative configuration (or the decorators, my preferred choice) is
bad if you plan to write apps that might be extended by others.
Am I right in understanding that this
Chris McDonough wrote:
No. You can always override an individual registration (obtained via
imperative configuration, a scan, or via ZCML) with a subsequent
imperative registration.
Okay, but how would I override a decorator with another decorator?
What happens if a scan finds two
Am 29.04.2010, 13:32 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk:
So why the big warnings in the book?
They're not warnings but reasoned guidance and developer preference.
External configuration à la ZCML was not invented by Zope. XML is verbose
but good editor support makes things a
Charlie Clark wrote:
Decorators are a little harder 'cos you can't safely rely on the last
one wins philosophy so you end up needing some kind of ordering, or
raising an exception if something is defined more than once, which
precludes one package customising stuff from another if they both
On 04/29/2010 07:32 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
No. You can always override an individual registration (obtained via
imperative configuration, a scan, or via ZCML) with a subsequent
imperative registration.
Okay, but how would I override a decorator with another
On 04/28/2010 01:07 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
In the BFG book their are copious references to the fact that using
imperative configuration (or the decorators, my preferred choice) is
bad if you plan to write apps that might be extended by others.
Am I right in understanding that this is
14 matches
Mail list logo
