On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 01:08 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Tim Hoffman wrote:
> > Hi Chris
> >
> > You are correct, I just didn't want to see the "view" directive just
> > disappear and be left with a "page" implementation ;-).
>
> I just baked all this behavior into the "view" directive on the
On Sep 13, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Chris Rossi wrote:
> This looks reasonable. I think it would also be reasonable to just
> make this the standard 'view' functionality, since afaict the
> current functionality is a subset of this.
+1 for adding the attributes/functionality below as options to the
Tim Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
> You are correct, I just didn't want to see the "view" directive just
> disappear and be left with a "page" implementation ;-).
I just baked all this behavior into the "view" directive on the trunk. There
are no backwards incompatibilities.
- C
___
Hi Chris
You are correct, I just didn't want to see the "view" directive just
disappear and be left with a "page" implementation ;-).
T
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Chris Rossi wrote:
> I may be missing something that makes this impossible, but my point was that
> you could probably add it
I may be missing something that makes this impossible, but my point was that
you could probably add it to the existing implementation without changing
how any existing applications work. The existing functionality is all there
as a subset of the new stuff. But I haven't stared at it for too long
Hi
I am not too sure about making this the default 'view' implementation
or at least we need to retain the existing the simpler view directive.
I many cases I am/need to identify the template used much later in the
process, so for me baking the template
name in the view directive is certainly not
This looks reasonable. I think it would also be reasonable to just make
this the standard 'view' functionality, since afaict the current
functionality is a subset of this.
Chris
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Here's some sci fi I wrote up about a "page" ZCML direct
