Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#777753: gcc: LTO produces unreproducible debug information

2015-02-13 Thread conchur
The patches are now upstream [1, 2]. The last test [2] showed that these really seemed to be the culprit of the problem. In the meantime, Richard Biener proposed patches which can solve this problem. I've compiled my own version of gcc-4.9 using the attached patch and can confirm that the LTO

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Reproducible-commits] [notes] 01/01: add new issue, randomness_in_gnu_build_id and, so far, two packages affected by it: encfs and bacula

2015-02-13 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2015-02-13 11:10:31 -0500, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Samstag, 7. Februar 2015, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: I think it really is not helpful. It's like having a category “needs_more_work_to_understand_the_problem”. actually I think such a category, or even such categories, would be

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Fwd: reproducible builds

2015-02-13 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2015, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: * you could use --buildresult b1/b2 and avoid copying the buildresult around manually Holger, we are doing something similar in the jenkins script, but I don't get why. I guess because I wasn't aware of that option when I wrote the

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Reproducible-commits] [notes] 01/01: add new issue, randomness_in_gnu_build_id and, so far, two packages affected by it: encfs and bacula

2015-02-13 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Holger Levsen (2015-02-13 17:10:31) On Samstag, 7. Februar 2015, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: I think it really is not helpful. It's like having a category “needs_more_work_to_understand_the_problem”. actually I think such a category, or even such categories, would be helpful. I

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2_amd64.changes

2015-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2.dsc strip-nondeterminism_0.005.orig.tar.gz strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2.debian.tar.xz libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl_0.005-2_all.deb

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducible Builds — proof of concept successful for 83% of all sources in main

2015-02-13 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, I applaud this initiative. On 13-02-15 18:28, Reproducible builds folks wrote: If you want to help, a first step is to check the reproducibility of your packages [DDLIST]. Feel free to ask for help on the reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org mailing list or in #debian-reproducible

[Reproducible-builds] Processing of strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2_amd64.changes

2015-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2.dsc strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2.debian.tar.xz libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl_0.005-2_all.deb strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2_all.deb

[Reproducible-builds] strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2015-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
strip-nondeterminism_0.005-2.dsc: Refers to non-existing file 'strip-nondeterminism_0.005.orig.tar.gz' Perhaps you need to include the file in your upload? === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which