Re: [Reproducible-builds] [R-B WEBSITE PATCH] native en_US speaker website tweaks

Daniel Kahn Gillmor: > index.html | 8 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Thanks, it's now live! :) -- Lunar.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'`

[Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs

Hello reproducible build hackers! I am the maintainer of apt-listbugs and I have recently noticed that it was not built reproducibly [1]. The issue seemed to be due to the month and year inserted by rdtool into the man page. However, now it seems to be built reproducibly [2]. I am not sure the

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs

[ following the Reply-To I won't add Francesco to the To/Cc ] On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:16:39 +0100 Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > Is this something that should be

[Reproducible-builds] package uploaded to our repo

libxslt_1.1.28-2.1.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs

Hi Francesco, On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > I am the maintainer of apt-listbugs and I have recently noticed that it > was not built reproducibly [1]. The issue seemed to be due to the month > and year inserted by rdtool into the man page. We already have an

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility of apt-listbugs

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:16:39 +0100 Reiner Herrmann wrote: > Hi Francesco, Hi Reiner, thanks for your kind reply! > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Is this something that should be fixed in rdtool [3]? If this is the > > case, could you please file a