Source: cvm
Version: 0.96-1.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps fileordering umask
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that cvm coul
texlive-bin_2015.20150524.37493-7.0~reproducible3.dsc has just been uploaded to
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:07:41AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under
> Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the
> user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
> la
Source: sunpy
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
sunpy fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
Source: git
Version: 1:2.7.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps fileordering
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that git could not
Source: dietlibc
Version: 0.33~cvs20120325-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps fileordering
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that
Hello reproducible builds team!
I think you all are the bee's knees. However, some of the packages I
maintain aren't compatible with 32 bit architectures, like armhf, and are
explicitly marked as such. Yet the reproducible builds infrastructure still
tries to build on the incompatible architecture
