Satyam Zode:
> Yes! I'm looking at those issues but it seems those issues are more in
> number. Frankly speaking, I'm not completely aware about many of those.
> Hence, I'm requesting you all to give some suggestions (and may be list of
> issues) so that I can start working on it further.
> Or
Source: texlive-bin
Version: 2016.20160512.41045-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
Extended support of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in TL2016 does a great job
Ximin Luo:
> Concretely I have some suggestions:
>
> 1. instead of calling this "ignore" we call it "hide". and instead of
> "irrelevant" we say "common"/"minor"/"known"
Great suggestions! :)
> 2. diffoscope --ignore-* (or --hide-*) MUST NOT return 0 or otherwise
> give the impression that two
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:44:11PM +0200, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Concretely I have some suggestions:
>
> 1. instead of calling this "ignore" we call it "hide". and instead of
> "irrelevant" we say "common"/"minor"/"known"
strong ACK.
I really really like "--hide-timestamps" much better than
Jérémy Bobbio:
> Ximin Luo:
>> This is quite an open-ended problem and there is no single "correct"
>> answer. I don't even know myself what would be best, at this stage.
>
> I think what we need to come up with now is a list of use cases. Then we
> can decide which one we want to support and how
Source: astroquery
Version: 0.3.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
astroquery fails to build from source in
Ximin Luo:
> This is quite an open-ended problem and there is no single "correct"
> answer. I don't even know myself what would be best, at this stage.
I think what we need to come up with now is a list of use cases. Then we
can decide which one we want to support and how easy it should be.
Is