[Reproducible-builds] АКВА ВАКАНЦИЯ В ЛЪКИ БАНСКО***** ОТ 10.06.2016 Г.

2016-06-10 Thread Mariyana Petrova
Your email client cannot read this email. To view it online, please go here: http://marketer.luckybansko.bg/display.php?M=70388=0e3c5716d146ead1fba7524eb85a1da2=445=68=433 To stop receiving these

[Reproducible-builds] reproducible.debian.net status changes for strip-nondeterminism

2016-06-10 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2016-06-10 11:33 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/unstable/amd64/strip-nondeterminism changed from reproducible -> unreproducible ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [tex-k] SORCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES

2016-06-10 Thread Karl Berry
How does FORCE_SOURCE_DATE sound? Fine by me. Shall I change the pdftex source? I don't much want to make a new release just for this, but it would be fine (in fact preferable) to me if you made the change in Debian now. Since after all the whole thing is for your purposes, you might as

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#826982: hoichess: please make the build reproducible

2016-06-10 Thread Reiner Herrmann
Source: hoichess Version: 0.10.3-6.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that hoichess could

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#826981: cached-property: FTBFS:

2016-06-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: cached-property Version: 1.3.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, cached-property fails to build from source in

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#826980: astroml: FTBFS:

2016-06-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: astroml Version: 0.3-5 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, astroml fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#826979: android-platform-frameworks-base: FTBFS:

2016-06-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: android-platform-frameworks-base Version: 1:6.0.1+r16-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer,

[Reproducible-builds] strip-nondeterminism_0.018-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into jessie-backports, jessie-backports

2016-06-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 19:14:07 + Source: strip-nondeterminism Binary: libfile-stripnondeterminism-perl strip-nondeterminism dh-strip-nondeterminism Architecture: source all Version: 0.018-1~bpo8+1 Distribution:

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#826951: slicot: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-06-10 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Source: slicot Version: 5.0+20101122-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [PATCH] Reassign jobs for ff2b-armhf-rb to other nodes

2016-06-10 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 01:31:39PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Reassign jobs for ff2b-armhf-rb to other nodes, as it is down for the > forseeable future. thanks for the patch, before I apply something similar I have a question: does that mean ff2b is gone *forever*? if so, README and

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [tex-k] SORCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES

2016-06-10 Thread Ximin Luo
Karl Berry: > rename SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES to a more generic name like > USE_CLOCK_SOURCE_DATE. > > I'm fine with that, or any other reasonable name for the second envvar. > Just tell me the name you want. > OK, we've talked a bit more about it and gotten consensus. How does